Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are chronic, relapsing and remitting disorders of intestinal inflammation with potential systemic manifestations. Despite the availability of current biologics, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), anti-integrins, anti-interleukins and small molecules such as tofacitinib, the rates of primary and secondary treatment failure remain high in IBD. This highlights the importance of continued development of new therapeutic targets and modifications of existing ones to improve the treatment response rates and to also improve the safety profile and tolerability of these medications. In this review we will discuss novel treatment target agents including selective janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, anti-interleukin (IL) (IL-12/IL-23), leukocyte trafficking/migrating inhibitors (such as sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator) and other small molecules currently in development.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of advanced malignancies but are associated with diarrhea and colitis. The objective of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the incidence and outcomes of ICI-associated diarrhea and colitis. Bibliographic databases were searched through August 13, 2019, for observational studies of ICI therapy reporting the incidence and/or treatment of diarrhea or colitis. The primary outcome was ICI-associated diarrhea and colitis. Meta-analyses were performed with random-effects models. Twenty-five studies (N=12,661) were included. All studies had a high risk of bias in at least 1 domain. The overall incidence of diarrhea/colitis was 12.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.8–18.2, I ²=96.5]. The incidence was lower in patients treated with anti–programmed cell death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (4.1%, 95% CI, 2.6–6.5) than in those treated with anti–cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (20.1%, 95% CI, 15.9–25.1). The remission of diarrhea and/or colitis was higher in patients treated with corticosteroids plus biologics (88.4%, 95% CI, 79.4–93.8) than in those treated with corticosteroids alone (58.3%, 95% CI, 49.3–66.7, Q=18.7, P<0.001). ICI were permanently discontinued in 48.1% of patients (95% CI, 17.8–79.1). ICI were restarted after temporary interruption in 48.6% of patients (95% CI, 18.2–79.4) of whom 17.0% (95% CI, 6.4–30.0) experienced recurrence. Real-world incidence of ICI-associated diarrhea/colitis exceeds 10%. These events lead to permanent ICI discontinuation in just over 50% of patients, while <20% have recurrence of symptoms if ICI are resumed. Further studies are needed to identify patients who would benefit from early treatment with biologics as well as appropriate patients to resume ICI therapy.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic and progressive inflammatory disorder that affects the colon. The advent of advanced therapies such as biologic agents and small molecules has revolutionized the management of UC. Despite the expanding therapeutic armamentarium of advanced therapies to treat UC, the overall net remission rates and durability of currently available agents are relatively low. This highlights the need for further drug development and more innovative clinical trial design. There are currently multiple emerging agents in the pipeline for the management of UC. This includes agents with alternative routes of administration such as oral or subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or novel mechanisms of action such as toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist cobitolimod and phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast. In this review, we will highlight novel and emerging advanced therapies currently in the pipeline for the management of UC.

There are limited data on how vedolizumab (VDZ) impacts extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of EIMs after initiation of VDZ for patients with IBD. A multicenter retrospective study of patients with IBD who received at least 1 dose of VDZ between January 1, 2014 and August 1, 2019 was conducted. The primary outcome was the rate of worsening EIMs after VDZ. Secondary outcomes were factors associated with worsening EIMs and peripheral arthritis (PA) specifically after VDZ. A total of 201 patients with IBD (72.6% with Crohn disease; median age 38.4 years (interquartile range, 29-52.4 years); 62.2% female) with EIMs before VDZ treatment were included. The most common type of EIM before VDZ was peripheral arthritis (PA) (68.2%). Worsening of EIMs after VDZ occurred in 34.8% of patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the worsened EIM (n = 70) and the stable EIM (n = 131) groups in term of age, IBD subtype, or previous and current medical therapy. We found that PA was significantly more common in the worsening EIM group (84.3% vs 59.6%; P < 0.01). Worsening of EIMs was associated with a higher rate of discontinuation of VDZ during study follow-up when compared with the stable EIM group (61.4% vs 44%; P = 0.02). Treatment using VDZ was discontinued specifically because of EIMs in 9.5% of patients. Almost one-third of patients had worsening EIMs after VDZ, which resulted in VDZ discontinuation in approximately 10% of patients. Previous biologic use or concurrent immunosuppressant or corticosteroid therapy did not predict EIM course after VDZ.

Background and aims: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) will become increasingly important as primary endpoints in future clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the combination of patient-reported clinical symptoms (ClinPRO2) and Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of 90 consecutive UC patients who were scheduled for sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. All patients completed the following questionnaires: (1) self-rated rectal bleeding and stool frequency (ClinPRO2); (2) Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ); (3) European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Level (EQ5D3L); (4) Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI); (5) Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F); and (6) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The endoscopic images were graded according to the MES. “No symptoms” was defined as a symptom score of 0, and “mucosal healing” was defined as MES score of 0–1. Correlations between the combined ClinPRO2 and MES with HRQoL were assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results: The combination of the ClinPRO2 and MES was well correlated to SIBDQ (r = −0.70), EQ5D3L (r = −0.51), WPAI (r = 0.62), FACIT-F (r = −0.58), and HADS-depression (r = 0.45). SIBDQ scores had strong correlations with FACIT-F (r = 0.86), WPAI (r = −0.80), and HADS-depression (r = −0.75) (p < 0.05 for all correlations). Patients with no symptoms reported the greatest all HRQoL scores. Conclusions: In patients with ulcerative colitis, the combination of a ClinPRO2 and the MES had good correlation with the SIBDQ. In addition, SIBDQ was well correlated to the various HRQoL.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) occurs in up to 70%–80% of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Oral vancomycin therapy (OVT) has been reported to be effective in the treatment of IBD associated with PSC (IBD-PSC). Objectives: To examine the effectiveness and safety of OVT in the treatment of IBD-PSC by performing a systematic review and pooled analysis of the literature. Design: We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of studies reporting IBD clinical response to OVT in IBD-PSC. Data sources and methods: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to June 3, 2024. We included adult and pediatric studies that reported on clinical response (defined as any improvement in IBD-related clinical symptoms) of IBD-PSC patients treated with OVT (including pre- and post-liver transplantation cohorts). Pooled analyses of OVT response and safety were performed. Results: A total of 21 (open-label, non-controlled) studies including 290 patients with IBD-PSC treated with OVT were included. The median duration of OVT to treat IBD-PSC was 32.5 weeks (interquartile range (IQR): 19–83 weeks). The total daily dose of OVT ranged from 250 to 1500 mg. Concomitant treatment included the following: mesalamine in 14.5% ( n = 42), advanced therapies in 10.7% ( n = 31), and immunosuppressive agents in 14.1% ( n = 41). Clinical response was noted in 47.6% (138/290) and clinical remission in 43.5% (100/230). The biochemical remission rate post-OVT was 68.8% (55/80) and endoscopic remission was 39.4% (80/203). Three studies ( n = 11) reported no episodes of acute cholangitis while on OVT. Five studies ( n = 69) reported an incidence rate of 8.7% of vancomycin-resistant enterococci post-OVT to treat IBD-PSC. Conclusion: OVT was associated with clinical response/remission in almost half of patients with IBD-PSC with a favorable side effect profile. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the dosing, efficacy, treatment duration, and long-term safety of OVT for the treatment of IBD-PSC. Trial registration: The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO a priori (no. CRD42023438341).