Deborah M. Hinton

Dr. Deborah M. Hinton

Gene Expression and Regulation Section, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 September 2013 in Annual Review of Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KDKimberly B. Decker
Kimberly B. Decker
DHDeborah M. Hinton
Deborah M. Hinton
Multisubunit RNA polymerases are complex protein machines that require a specificity factor for the recognition of a specific transcription start site. Although bacterial σ factors are thought to be quite different from the specificity factors employed in higher organisms, a comparison of the σ/RNA polymerase structures with recent structures of eukaryotic Pol II together with TFIIB highlights significant functional similarities. Other work reveals that both bacterial and eukaryotic promoters are composed of modular elements that are used in different combinations. Bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes also utilize similar strategies to alter core promoter specificity, from specificity factor exchange to the employment of activators that bind close to or overlap core promoter sequences, directing the transcriptional machinery to a new start site. Here we examine the details of core promoter recognition in bacteria that reveal the transcriptional similarities throughout biology.

28 October 2010 in Virology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DHDeborah M. Hinton
Deborah M. Hinton
Control of transcription is crucial for correct gene expression and orderly development. For many years, bacteriophage T4 has provided a simple model system to investigate mechanisms that regulate this process. Development of T4 requires the transcription of early, middle and late RNAs. Because T4 does not encode its own RNA polymerase, it must redirect the polymerase of its host, E. coli, to the correct class of genes at the correct time. T4 accomplishes this through the action of phage-encoded factors. Here I review recent studies investigating the transcription of T4 prereplicative genes, which are expressed as early and middle transcripts. Early RNAs are generated immediately after infection from T4 promoters that contain excellent recognition sequences for host polymerase. Consequently, the early promoters compete extremely well with host promoters for the available polymerase. T4 early promoter activity is further enhanced by the action of the T4 Alt protein, a component of the phage head that is injected into E. coli along with the phage DNA. Alt modifies Arg265 on one of the two α subunits of RNA polymerase. Although work with host promoters predicts that this modification should decrease promoter activity, transcription from some T4 early promoters increases when RNA polymerase is modified by Alt. Transcription of T4 middle genes begins about 1 minute after infection and proceeds by two pathways: 1) extension of early transcripts into downstream middle genes and 2) activation of T4 middle promoters through a process called sigma appropriation. In this activation, the T4 co-activator AsiA binds to Region 4 of σ70, the specificity subunit of RNA polymerase. This binding dramatically remodels this portion of σ70, which then allows the T4 activator MotA to also interact with σ70. In addition, AsiA restructuring of σ70 prevents Region 4 from forming its normal contacts with the -35 region of promoter DNA, which in turn allows MotA to interact with its DNA binding site, a MotA box, centered at the -30 region of middle promoter DNA. T4 sigma appropriation reveals how a specific domain within RNA polymerase can be remolded and then exploited to alter promoter specificity.

8 November 2017 in mBio
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKyung Moon
Kyung Moon
RBRichard P. Bonocora
Richard P. Bonocora
DKDavid D. Kim
David D. Kim
QCQing Chen
Qing Chen
JWJoseph Wade
Joseph Wade
DHDeborah M. Hinton
Deborah M. Hinton
Nearly all virulence factors in Bordetella pertussis are activated by a master two-component system, BvgAS, composed of the sensor kinase BvgS and the response regulator BvgA. When BvgS is active, BvgA is phosphorylated (BvgA~P), and virulence-activated genes ( vag s) are expressed [Bvg(+) mode]. When BvgS is inactive and BvgA is not phosphorylated, virulence-repressed genes ( vrg s) are induced [Bvg(−) mode]. Here, we have used transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to define the BvgAS-dependent regulon of B. pertussis Tohama I. Our analyses reveal more than 550 BvgA-regulated genes, of which 353 are newly identified. BvgA-activated genes include those encoding two-component systems (such as kdpED ), multiple other transcriptional regulators, and the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor brpL , which is needed for type 3 secretion system (T3SS) expression, further establishing the importance of BvgA~P as an apex regulator of transcriptional networks promoting virulence. Using in vitro transcription, we demonstrate that the promoter for brpL is directly activated by BvgA~P. BvgA-FeBABE cleavage reactions identify BvgA~P binding sites centered at positions −41.5 and −63.5 in bprL . Most importantly, we show for the first time that genes for multiple and varied metabolic pathways are significantly upregulated in the B. pertussis Bvg(−) mode. These include genes for fatty acid and lipid metabolism, sugar and amino acid transporters, pyruvate dehydrogenase, phenylacetic acid degradation, and the glycolate/glyoxylate utilization pathway. Our results suggest that metabolic changes in the Bvg(−) mode may be participating in bacterial survival, transmission, and/or persistence and identify over 200 new vrg s that can be tested for function. IMPORTANCE Within the past 20 years, outbreaks of whooping cough, caused by Bordetella pertussis , have led to respiratory disease and infant mortalities, despite good vaccination coverage. This is due, at least in part, to the introduction of a less effective acellular vaccine in the 1990s. It is crucial, then, to understand the molecular basis of B. pertussis growth and infection. The two-component system BvgA (response regulator)/BvgS (histidine kinase) is the master regulator of B. pertussis virulence genes. We report here the first RNA-seq analysis of the BvgAS regulon in B. pertussis , revealing that more than 550 genes are regulated by BvgAS. We show that genes for multiple and varied metabolic pathways are highly regulated in the Bvg(−) mode (absence of BvgA phosphorylation). Our results suggest that metabolic changes in the Bvg(−) mode may be participating in bacterial survival, transmission, and/or persistence.

1 June 2001 in Journal of Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVSrilatha Vuthoori
Srilatha Vuthoori
CBChristina Wilson Bowers
Christina Wilson Bowers
AMAndrea McCracken
Andrea McCracken
ADAlicia J. Dombroski
Alicia J. Dombroski
DHDeborah M. Hinton
Deborah M. Hinton

11 July 2018 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMeng-Lun Hsieh
Meng-Lun Hsieh
DHDeborah M. Hinton
Deborah M. Hinton
CWChristopher M Waters
Christopher M Waters
The small molecule cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) is known to affect bacterial gene expression in myriad ways. In Vibrio cholerae in vivo, the presence of c-di-GMP together with the response regulator VpsR results in transcription from PvpsL, a promoter of biofilm biosynthesis genes. VpsR shares homology with enhancer binding proteins that activate σ54-RNA polymerase (RNAP), but it lacks conserved residues needed to bind to σ54-RNAP and to hydrolyze adenosine triphosphate, and PvpsL transcription does not require σ54 in vivo. Consequently, the mechanism of this activation has not been clear. Using an in vitro transcription system, we demonstrate activation of PvspL in the presence of VpsR, c-di-GMP and σ70-RNAP. c-di-GMP does not significantly change the affinity of VpsR for PvpsL DNA or the DNase I footprint of VpsR on the DNA, and it is not required for VpsR to dimerize. However, DNase I and KMnO4 footprints reveal that the σ70-RNAP/VpsR/c-di-GMP complex on PvpsL adopts a different conformation from that formed by σ70-RNAP alone, with c-di-GMP or with VpsR. Our results suggest that c-di-GMP is required for VpsR to generate the specific protein–DNA architecture needed for activated transcription, a previously unrecognized role for c-di-GMP in gene expression.

20 January 2009 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IHIndia G. Hook-Barnard
India G. Hook-Barnard
DHDeborah M. Hinton
Deborah M. Hinton
Transcription initiation is a dynamic process in which RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter DNA act as partners, changing in response to one another, to produce a polymerase/promoter open complex (RPo) competent for transcription. In Escherichia coli RNAP, region 1.1, the N-terminal 100 residues of σ 70 , is thought to occupy the channel that will hold the DNA downstream of the transcription start site; thus, region 1.1 must move from this channel as RPo is formed. Previous work has also shown that region 1.1 can modulate RPo formation depending on the promoter. For some promoters region 1.1 stimulates the formation of open complexes; at the P minor promoter, region 1.1 inhibits this formation. We demonstrate here that the AT-rich P minor spacer sequence, rather than promoter recognition elements or downstream DNA, determines the effect of region 1.1 on promoter activity. Using a P minor derivative that contains good σ 70 -dependent DNA elements, we find that the presence of a more GC-rich spacer or a spacer with the complement of the P minor sequence results in a promoter that is no longer inhibited by region 1.1. Furthermore, the presence of the P minor spacer, the GC-rich spacer, or the complement spacer results in different mobilities of promoter DNA during gel electrophoresis, suggesting that the spacer regions impart differing conformations or curvatures to the DNA. We speculate that the spacer can influence the trajectory or flexibility of DNA as it enters the RNAP channel and that region 1.1 acts as a “gatekeeper” to monitor channel entry.