Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is defined as urologic pain or discomfort in the pelvic region, associated with urinary symptoms and/or sexual dysfunction, lasting for at least 3 of the previous 6 months. The rate of symptoms related to prostatitis has a mean prevalence of 8–8.2%. CP/CPPS is most frequent in men younger than 50 years, among whom it is the most common urologic diagnosis. In the last decades, many studies have been published on CP/CPPS and its association with male infertility. The pathophysiologic relation between CP/CPPS and male infertility involves several aspects, which are not well studied yet. A reduction in semen parameters has been demonstrated in patients with CP/CPPS, and several mechanisms have been proposed to represent putative pathophysiological links between CP/CPPS and infertility, including male accessory gland inflammation, metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, HPV co-infection and autoimmunity. In light of this evidence, a multidisciplinary approach is advocated for patients with known CP/CPPS, and particular attention is needed for male patients of infertile couples in order to evaluate male accessory glands correctly. In addition, it is advisable that future studies dealing with the treatment of CP/CPPS take into consideration all the different pathophysiological aspects implicated.

In recent years, several studies have analyzed the composition of the male genital tract microbiota and its changes in infertility or in different situations associated with infertility. The aim of this narrative review is to obtain more insight on this topic; in particular, to describe actual evidence about changes in the semen microbiota in patients with infertility, male tract infections, or HPV infections. In semen, an increase in semen Prevotella spp. is associated with oligozoospermia and with obesity-associated asthenozoospermia; an increase in Pseudomonas is more frequently associated with asthenozoospermia and oligozoospermia; a reduction in Lactobacilli spp. (namely in Lactobacillus crispatus) may represent a marker of low semen quality. However, an increase in Lactobacillus iners is considered a risk factor for a reduced sperm concentration. In patients with prostatitis, there is a reduction in Lactobacillus spp. and an increase in Streptococcus spp., opening important perspectives about the role of probiotic treatments in these patients. Finally, an increase in Fusobacteria spp. was observed in patients with an HPV infection. In the conclusion, we underline the interactions between the seminal and vaginal microbiota, so that further studies should focus on the “couple genital microbiota”.

Pharmacotherapy involving hormones and hormone-derived molecules has various potential treatment targets. This includes addressing (partial) hormonal deficiencies, pursuing osteoanabolic effects, providing contraceptive options, or supporting gender-affirming transitions. In chronotherapy, the timing of the administration of active ingredients and different pharmaceutical forms is leveraged to maximize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects, based on the principle that it is optimal for drugs to be administered according to the body's circadian rhythms. Just as a drummer sets the pace and keeps the rhythm steady for the entire band, the physician, through the application of chronotherapy, ensures the treatment regimen is harmonized with the body's internal clock. However, while this is a consolidated aspect for several endocrine treatments, for others, it represents a novelty. The new advancements in the treatment of osteoporosis, with the latest parathyroid hormone–related protein analogue, abaloparatide, or in congenital adrenal hyperplasia with the new long-lasting hydrocortisone formulation, are notable examples. We herein summarized the state of the art regarding the hormonal circadian rhythm to discuss in depth the evidence available regarding the correct timing of commonly administered hormonal therapies in adult patients. By offering clear indications, this manuscript delves into the importance of harmonizing hormonal therapy with circadian rhythms through chronotherapy, exploring its potential to enhance therapeutic outcomes while minimizing adverse effects.

Pseudohyperaldosteronism (PHA) is characterized by hypertension, hypokalemia, and a decrease in plasma renin and aldosterone levels. It can be caused by several causes, but the most frequent is due to excess intake of licorice. The effect is mediated by the active metabolite of licorice, glycyrrhetinic acid (GA), which acts by blocking the 11-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 and binding to the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) as an agonist. The management of licorice-induced PHA depends on several individual factors, such as age, gender, comorbidities, duration and amount of licorice intake, and metabolism. The clinical picture usually reverts upon licorice withdrawal, but sometimes mineralocorticoid-like effects can be critical and persist for several weeks, requiring treatment with MR blockers and potassium supplements. Through this case series of licorice-induced PHA, we aim to increase awareness about exogenous PHA, and the possible risk associated with excess intake of licorice. An accurate history is mandatory in patients with hypertension and hypokalemia to avoid unnecessary testing. GA is a component of several products, such as candies, breath fresheners, beverages, tobacco, cosmetics, and laxatives. In recent years, the mechanisms of action of licorice and its active compounds have been better elucidated, suggesting its benefits in several clinical settings. Nevertheless, licorice should still be consumed with caution, considering that licorice-induced PHA is still an underestimated condition, and its intake should be avoided in patients with increased risk of licorice toxicity due to concomitant comorbidities or interfering drugs.

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) administration is applied in the management of subjects affected by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Whilst this application is widely recognized and established alone or in combination with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a similar strategy is empirically advocated in idiopathic male factor infertility (MFI). In this setting, FSH therapy has been used to increase sperm quantity, quality, and pregnancy rate when FSH plasma concentrations are below 8 IU/L and when the seminal tract is not obstructed. In the literature, several studies suggested that giving FSH to patients with idiopathic MFI increases sperm count and motility, raising the overall pregnancy rate. However, this efficacy seems to be limited, and about 10–18 men should be treated to achieve one pregnancy. Thus, several papers suggest the need to move from a replacement approach to an overstimulating approach in the management of FSH therapy in idiopathic MFI. To this aim, it is imperative to determine some pharmacologic markers of FSH efficacy. Furthermore, it should be useful in clinical practice to distinguish, before starting the treatment, among patients who might respond or not to FSH treatment. Indeed, previous studies suggest that infertile men who have normal levels of gonadotropins in plasma might not respond to FSH treatment and about 50% of patients might be defined as “non-responders”. For these reasons, identifying predictive markers of FSH action in spermatogenesis and clinical markers of response to FSH treatment is a fascinating area of study that might lead to new developments with the aim of achieving personalization of the treatment of male infertility. From this perspective, seminal parameters (i.e., spermatid count), testicular cytology, genetic assessment, and miRNA or protein markers in the future might be used to create a tailored FSH therapy plan. The personalization of FSH treatment is mandatory to minimize side effects, to avoid lost time with ineffective treatments, and to improve the efficacy, predicting the most efficient dose and the duration of the treatment. This narrative review’s objective is to discuss the role of the different putative factors which have been proposed to predict the response to FSH treatment in idiopathic infertile men.