Many countries are administering a third dose of COVID-19 vaccines, but the evaluation of vaccine-induced immunity is insufficient. In addition, there are few reports of long-term observation of anti-spike IgG antibody titers after the vaccination in the Japanese population. This study aimed to evaluate anti-spike IgG levels in the Japanese health care workers six months after the BNT162b2 vaccination. Dynamics of anti-spike IgG levels were assessed over a six-month period following the second vaccination in 49 participants (Analysis-1). A cross-sectional assessment of anti-spike IgG levels six months after the second vaccination was performed in 373 participants (Analysis-2). In Analysis-1, the geometric mean titer of anti-spike IgG was lower in the older age group and decreased consistently after the second vaccination regardless of age. In Analysis-2, the anti-spike IgG level was significantly negatively associated with age (r = −0.35, p < 0.01). This correlation remained statistically significant (r = −0.28, p < 0.01) after adjustment for sex, BMI, smoking habits, alcohol drinking habits, allergies, and fever or other adverse reactions at the time of vaccination. Additionally, participants who drank alcohol daily had significantly lower anti-spike IgG levels than participants who had never drunk alcohol. Sex, smoking habits, allergy, and fever and other side effects after vaccination did not show a significant association with anti-spike IgG levels. Six months post-vaccination, the anti-spike IgG level was substantially lower in older persons and daily alcohol drinkers. This may be an indication for an additional vaccine dose for these at-risk categories.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), remains uncontrolled, with the spread of emerging variants. According to accumulating evidence, diabetes is one of the leading risk factors for a severe COVID-19 clinical course, depending on the glycemic state before admission and during COVID-19 hospitalization. Multiple factors are thought to be responsible, including an altered immune response, coexisting comorbidity, and disruption of the renin-angiotensin system through the virus–host interaction. However, the precise underlying mechanisms remain under investigation. Alternatively, the focus is currently on the diabetogenic and ketosis-prone potential of SARS-CoV-2 itself, even for probable triggers of stress and steroid-induced hyperglycemia in COVID-19. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the recent literature on the clinical and experimental findings associated with diabetes and COVID-19, and we discuss their bidirectional relationship, i.e., the risk for an adverse prognosis and the deleterious effects on glycometabolism. Accurate assessments of the incidence of new-onset diabetes induced by COVID-19 and its pathogenicity are still unknown, especially in the context of the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 variants, such as Omicron (B.1.1.529), which is a major challenge for the future.

Background: Infection control during COVID‐19 outbreaks in nursing facilities is a critical public health issue. Antibody responses before and after the third (booster) dose of SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination in nursing home residents have not been fully characterized.Methods: This study included 117 individuals: 54 nursing home residents (mean age, 83.8 years; 39 SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive and 15 previously infected) and 63 healthcare workers (mean age, 45.8 years; 32 SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive and 31 previously infected). Anti‐spike (receptor‐binding domain [RBD]) and anti‐nucleocapsid antibody responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination and their related factors were evaluated using pre‐ (shortly and 6 months after the second dose) and post‐booster vaccination samples.Results: The median anti‐spike (RBD) IgG level in SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive residents 6 months after the second dose was the lowest among the four groups, with a decreasing rate of over 90%. The median rate of increase before and after the third dose in SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive residents was significantly higher than that in SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive healthcare workers (64.1‐ vs. 37.0‐fold, P = 0.003), with the highest level among the groups. The IgG ratio of SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive residents to healthcare workers after the second and third doses changed from one‐fifth (20%) to one‐half (50%). The rate of increase after the third dose in previously infected individuals was three‐ to fourfold, regardless of residents or healthcare workers.Conclusions: Advanced aged nursing home residents, poor responders in the initial SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine series, could obtain sufficient antibody responses with the additional booster dose, despite more than 6 months after the second.