Alba L'Astorina

Dr. Alba L'Astorina

Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, Naples, Campania, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2022 in Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLaura Criscuolo
Laura Criscuolo
ALAlba L'Astorina
Alba L'Astorina
RWRené van der Wal
René van der Wal
LGLaura Colucci Gray
Laura Colucci Gray

1 January 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
MCMaura Calliera
Maura Calliera
ALAlba L'Astorina
Alba L'Astorina

29 September 2015 in Journal of Science Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAlba L'Astorina
Alba L'Astorina
ITIrene Tomasoni
Irene Tomasoni
ABAnna Basoni
Anna Basoni
PCPaola Carrara
Paola Carrara
Modern technology and innovation research needs to analyse and collect users’ requirements from the outset of the project’s design, according to the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) approach. Bringing in new services without involving end-users in the whole research process does not make for optimal results in terms of scientific, technological and economic impact. This commentary reports on research experience of stakeholder involvement and co-production in Italy, implemented in Earth Observation downstream services at regional level. It reports the participative approach and method adopted and the impacts and benefits derived.

4 September 2024 in Frontiers in Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRita Giuffredi
Rita Giuffredi
VGValentina Grasso
Valentina Grasso
ALAlba L'Astorina
Alba L'Astorina
This study examines the online communication practices of research institutes affiliated with the Italian National Research Council. The analysis employs a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate whether these institutes leverage digital technologies to transition from a unidirectional, strategic approach to communication towards a more dialogic and engaging approach with the public. Specifically, the study analyses the institutes’ websites, assessing their use of communication tools, content, target audience, knowledge flows, and contextualization of communication activities, while also highlighting disciplinary-based differences. Although recent research identified Research Institutes’ level as a promising ground for research communication to flourish, our study suggests that, on average, they still employ digital technologies in the same way as traditional media, disseminating information about institutional advancements rather than fostering interactive dialogue. Communication styles remain grounded in Dissemination and Strategic models, which restricts the ability of research institutes to develop a dynamic and transformative relationship with society.


23 March 2023 in Frontiers in Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBCaterina Bergami
Caterina Bergami
Alessandro CampanaroAlessandro Campanaro
Alessandro Campanaro
CDCathlyn Davis
Cathlyn Davis
ALAlba L'Astorina
Alba L'Astorina
APAlessandra Pugnetti
Alessandra Pugnetti
AOAlessandro Oggioni
Alessandro Oggioni
In the last decades, citizen science (CS) has experienced an increasing interest as a practice in which scientists and citizens collaborate to produce new knowledge for science, society and policy. Environmental and ecological sciences are among the most active in proposing CS activities and new models for citizen participation in research. In addition to environmental dimensions, these fields necessarily include social and cultural dimensions to confront the complex local and global environmental challenges. This is particularly evident in the International Long-Term Ecological Research (ILTER) network, where the integration of social sciences has become a recognized priority. ILTER offers a valuable landscape to explore common CS features across a wide range of different cultural and socio-ecological contexts, as well as worldviews of science-society interactions. In 2020, we surveyed scientists working at ILTER sites across the globe to identify key features of CS initiatives in which they are/were involved and the levels of participation of the volunteers. We consider these features in the context of the internationally-developed “Ten Principles of Citizen Science” by examining scientific outcomes and societal/policy impact, type of volunteers’ involvement, and sharing of data/findings and feedbacks and acknowledging volunteers. Our results indicate that the ILTER community demonstrated a good predisposition toward environmentally-focused CS initiatives with diverse scientific questions including biodiversity, water quality, ecosystem services and climate change. Most of the respondents reported that the volunteers were involved mainly in collecting samples or recording data; some other activities, such as dissemination of the project conclusions and discussion and translation of the results into action, were also mentioned. Volunteers were usually trained for these initiatives and acknowledged in peer-reviewed publication, however data from the initiatives were only partially shared openly. We conclude with remarks and suggestions for expanding design and implementation of CS in the ILTER community.