Background. Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is debated. The aim of this study was to execute a comprehensive assessment of principal surgical treatments for resectable distal gastric cancer. Methods. Systematic review and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) network meta-analysis. Open (Op-DG), laparoscopic-assisted (LapAs-DG), totally laparoscopic (Lap-DG), and robotic distal gastrectomy (Rob-DG) were compared. Pooled effect-size measures were the risk ratio (RR), the weighted mean difference (WMD), and the 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results. Ten RCTs (3823 patients) were included. Overall, 1012 (26.5%) underwent Lap-DG, 902 (23.6%) LapAs-DG, 1768 (46.2%) Op-DG, and 141 (3.7%) Rob-DG. Anastomotic leak, severe complications (Clavien–Dindo > 3), and in-hospital mortality were comparable. No differences were observed for reoperation rate, pulmonary complications, postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion, surgical-site infection, cardiovascular complications, number of harvested lymph nodes, and tumor-free resection margins. Compared to Op-DG, Lap-DG and LapAs-DG showed a significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss with a trend toward shorter time to first flatus and reduced length of stay. Conclusions. LapAs-DG, Lap-DG, and Rob-DG performed in referral centers by dedicated surgeons have comparable short-term outcomes to Op-DG for locally AGC.

Background: Indocyanine green-guided (ICG-guided) lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy for cancer has been proposed to enhance the accuracy of lymphadenectomy. The impact of ICG-guided lymphadenectomy on patient survival remains debated. Methods: The findings of the systematic review were reconstructed into an individual patient data (IDP) meta-analysis with restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival were primary outcomes. RMSTD, standardized mead difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. Results: Three studies (6325 patients) were included; 42% of patients underwent ICG-guided lymphadenectomy. The patients’ age ranged from 47 to 72 years and 58% were males. Proximal, distal, and total gastrectomy were completed in 6.8%, 80.4%, and 12.8% of patients, respectively. The surgical approach was laparoscopic (62.3%) and robotic (37.7%). ICG-guided lymphadenectomy was associated with a higher number of harvested lymph nodes compared to non-ICG-guided lymphadenectomy (SMD 0.50; 95% CI 0.45–0.55). At the 42-month follow-up, OS and DFS estimates for ICG-guided vs. non-ICG-guided lymphadenectomy were 0.5 months (95% CI −0.01, 1.1) and 1.3 months (95% CI 0.39, 2.15), respectively. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that ICG-guided lymphadenectomy offers equivalent long-term OS and DFS compared to non-ICG-guided lymphadenectomy.

Background: Thoracic duct ligation (TDL) during esophagectomy has been proposed to reduce the risk of postoperative chylothorax. Because of its role in immunoregulation, some authors argued that it had an unfavorable TDL effect on survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of TDL on overall survival (OS). Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2023. The primary outcome was 5-year OS. The restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. The GRADE methodology was used to summarize the certainty of the evidence. Results: Five studies (3291 patients) were included. TDL was reported in 54% patients. The patients’ age ranged from 49 to 69, 76% were males, and BMI ranged from 18 to 26. At the 5-year follow-up, the combined effect from the multivariate meta-analysis is -3.5 months (95% CI −6.1, −0.8) indicating that patients undergoing TDL lived 3.5 months less compared to those without TDL. TDL was associated with a significantly higher hazard for mortality at 12 months (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38–1.73), 24 months (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12–1.35), and 28 months (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02–1.28). TDL and noTDL seem comparable in terms of the postoperative risk for chylothorax (RR = 0.66; p = 0.35). Conclusions: In this study, concurrent TDL was associated with reduced 5-year OS after esophagectomy. This may suggest the need of a rigorous follow-up within the first two years of follow-up.

Background: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication after gastrectomy. It is associated with prolonged hospital stay, greater expenses, and increased risk for 90-day mortality. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the effect of AL on OS in patients with GC undergoing gastrectomy. This study was designed to investigate the effect of AL on long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were queried during the search process. The literature search started in January 2025 and was updated in May 2025. The studies analyzed the impact of AL on long-term survival, with the primary outcome being long-term overall survival. Pooled effect size measures included restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Ten studies (11,862 patients) were included. Overall, 338 (2.9%) patients experienced AL. The RMSTD analysis indicates that at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, patients with AL tend to live 1.1, 3.1, 5.2, 8.1, and 10.6 months shorter, respectively, compared to those who did not develop AL. All results were statistically significant with p < 0.0001. The time-dependent HRs analysis for AL versus no AL shows a higher mortality hazard in patients with AL at 12 (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11–1.58), 24 (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.34–1.92), 36 (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27–1.91), 48 months (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02–1.53), and 60 months (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59–1.10). Conclusions: This research appears to indicate a clinical impact of AL on long-term OS after gastrectomy. Patients experiencing AL appear to have an increased risk of mortality within the initial four years of follow-up.

Background/Objectives: The optimal surgical management of perforated gastric cancer (PGC) in emergency settings remains controversial. Urgent upfront one-stage gastrectomy (1SG) and two-stage gastrectomy (2SG) with damage-control surgery followed by elective gastrectomy have been proposed. The aim of the present systematic review is to compare short- and long-term outcomes between 1SG and 2SG in the treatment of PGC. Methods: A systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of studies reporting data of patients undergoing 1SG vs. 2SG for PGC was conducted. The time-dependent effects of surgical interventions were assessed using a likelihood ratio test. Hazard function plots were generated via marginal prediction. Results: Ten retrospective series (579 patients) were included. Overall, 482 patients (83%) underwent 1SG, while 97 patients (17%) were treated with 2SG. A trend toward better short-term oncological outcomes and safety profiles for 2SG compared to 1SG was observed. Long-term outcomes were comparable between 1SG and 2SG, and the IPD meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two approaches in terms of OS or hazard for mortality at all time points. A trend towards a higher hazard for mortality was observed for 1SG in the first 20 months postoperatively. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that 1SG and 2SG yield comparable short-term outcomes, although 2SG may be associated with a lower medium-term mortality risk. Further research is needed to identify key factors to improve clinical judgments and decision-making in PGC.