Risto Rautiainen

Risto Rautiainen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2002 in Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRisto Rautiainen
Risto Rautiainen
SRS. J. Reynolds
S. J. Reynolds
This article summarizes the trends in agricultural injuries and illnesses in the past decade, as well as the needs for surveillance in the future. Agriculture is one of the most hazardous industries in the U.S. The fatality rate in agriculture remained high (about 22/100,000 workers) through the 1990s. and tractors remained the leading source of death, causing approximately 300 fatalities each year. Non-fatal injuries and illnesses decreased in the employed agricultural worker population. There are no adequate injury and illness data for self-employed farmers and family members to show trends over time. The reported injury rates have been 0.5 to 16.6/100 workers, based on the source of information. Many studies have shown high rates of respiratory and musculoskeletal symptoms, hearing loss, and skin disorders in agriculture. The overall cancer rate is lower; however, certain cancers are elevated in farmers. Surveillance information has not improved significantly in the past decade; however, many studies have provided more insight into the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for injury and illness. Further efforts are needed to better define the populations at risk, including farmers and ranchers, family members, workers, migrant and seasonal workers, and others exposed to farm hazards. Fatalities are well documented, and it is important to continue existing surveillance in the future. Surveillance systems should be developed to collect information on agriculture-related non-fatal injuries and illnesses.

23 January 2008 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRisto Rautiainen
Risto Rautiainen
MLMarika M Lehtola
Marika M Lehtola
LDLesley Margaret Day
Lesley Margaret Day
ESEva Schonstein
Eva Schonstein
JSJuha Suutarinen
Juha Suutarinen
JVJos H Verbeek
Jos H Verbeek

18 April 2016 in Journal of Agromedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RJRohan Jadhav
Rohan Jadhav
CAChandran Achutan
Chandran Achutan
GHGleb Haynatzki
Gleb Haynatzki
SRShireen Rajaram
Shireen Rajaram
RRRisto Rautiainen
Risto Rautiainen
Agricultural injury is a significant public health problem globally. Extensive research has addressed this problem, and a growing number of risk factors have been reported. The authors evaluated the evidence for frequently reported risk factors earlier. The objective in the current study was to identify emerging risk factors for agricultural injury and calculate pooled estimates for factors that were assessed in two or more studies. A total of 441 (PubMed) and 285 (Google Scholar) studies were identified focusing on occupational injuries in agriculture. From these, 39 studies reported point estimates of risk factors for injury; 38 of them passed the Newcastle-Ottawa criteria for quality and were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. Several risk factors were significantly associated with injury in the meta-analysis. These included older age (vs. younger), education up to high school or higher (vs. lower), non-Caucasian race (vs. Caucasian), Finnish language (vs. Swedish), residence on-farm (vs. off-farm), sleeping less than 7–7.5 hours (vs. more), high perceived injury risk (vs. low), challenging social conditions (vs. normal), greater farm sales, size, income, and number of employees on the farm (vs. smaller), animal production (vs. other production), unsafe practices conducted (vs. not), computer use (vs. not), dermal exposure to pesticides and/or chemicals (vs. not), high cooperation between farms (vs. not), and machinery condition fair/poor (vs. excellent/good). Eighteen of the 25 risk factors were significant in the meta-analysis. The identified risk factors should be considered when designing interventions and selecting populations at high risk of injury.

2 February 2009 in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRisto Rautiainen
Risto Rautiainen
JLJohannes Ledolter
Johannes Ledolter
KDKelley J. Donham
Kelley J. Donham
RORobert L. Ohsfeldt
Robert L. Ohsfeldt
CZCraig Zwerling
Craig Zwerling

2 January 2021 in Journal of Agromedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJAnthony Johnson
Anthony Johnson
LBLorena Baccaglini
Lorena Baccaglini
GHGleb R Haynatzki
Gleb R Haynatzki
CAChandran Achutan
Chandran Achutan
DLDana Loomis
Dana Loomis
RRRisto Rautiainen
Risto Rautiainen
The high risk of occupational fatalities in agriculture is well documented, but information on non-fatal injuries is lacking due to challenges in injury surveillance. This surveillance study explored the frequency, characteristics, and risk factors for non-fatal injuries among farmers and ranchers in the central United States. The Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Health (CS-CASH), in collaboration with the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), conducted annual surveys (n = 34,777 sent) during 2011–2015 covering a seven-state region (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, and South Dakota). The average response rate was 32% in the five consecutive annual surveys. The average injury incidence rate was 7.0 injuries/100 operators per year. Most injuries (89%) occurred during agricultural work. The most frequent sources of injury were livestock (22%), machinery (13%), and hand tools (12%). Risk factors for injury included: male gender, younger age (vs. 65+ years), farming as the primary occupation, greater work time, greater land area, ranch (vs. farm), organic farming, internet access, and production of several types of crops and animals. Most injuries (56%) required a doctor visit, and 12% required hospitalization. The average medical costs were $1,936 out of pocket and $8,043 paid by insurance. The combined average costs for most serious injuries were $7,858. Most injuries (66%) resulted in some lost time from agricultural work, and 13% were serious, resulting in more than 30 days of lost work time. The non-fatal injury rate for self-employed farmers and ranchers was higher than that of hired agricultural workers reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This result reaffirms farming/ranching as a dangerous occupation and emphasizes the need for efforts to prevent agricultural injuries, especially those associated with identified injury sources and risk factors.

1 November 2005 in Journal of Agromedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRisto Rautiainen
Risto Rautiainen
RORobert Ohsfeldt
Robert Ohsfeldt
NSNancy L. Sprince
Nancy L. Sprince
KDKelley J. Donham
Kelley J. Donham
LBLeon F. Burmeister
Leon F. Burmeister
CZCraig Zwerling
Craig Zwerling
Although agriculture is one of the most hazardous industries, the costs of agricultural injuries and illnesses are not well known. This study aimed to determine the cost burden from compensated inj...