This research investigates the impact of augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) and AI-enabled chatbots, both individually and collectively, on consumer engagement of e-commerce platforms. Moreover, this research examines the mediating effects of perceived utility, ease of use, and enjoyment and the moderating effects of product type and technology readiness, respectively. By applying the theories of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R), this research proposed this theoretical framework and adopted a mixed-method research method. This research collected its empirical findings from 486 respondents who had utilized chatbots and AR/VR technology on three of China’s most popular e-commerce platforms, including Taobao, JD.com, and Pinduoduo. Structural equation modeling was utilized for hypothesis testing, and semi-structured interviews on 30 participants were used for validation of empirical findings. Results reveal that both AI chatbot features (β = 0.35, p < 0.001) and AR/VR technologies (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) significantly enhance consumer engagement, with AR/VR demonstrating stronger effects. Perceived enjoyment emerged as the strongest mediator (AI: β = 0.14; AR/VR: β = 0.18), surpassing traditional utilitarian factors. Technology readiness significantly moderated these relationships, with high-readiness consumers showing substantially stronger responses (AI: β = 0.45; AR/VR: β = 0.52). Experience goods amplified technology effects compared to search goods. Multi-group analysis revealed platform-specific variations, while robustness checks identified diminishing returns for AI chatbots but not AR/VR technologies. This research contributes to digital marketing and information systems literature by providing empirical evidence of differential technology impacts on engagement, highlighting the dominance of hedonic over utilitarian pathways in consumer technology adoption. The findings offer practical guidance for e-commerce platforms in optimizing technology investments and designing engagement strategies.

Anthropomorphism has shown inconsistent effects on human judgment, yet the underlying cognitive mechanisms remain underspecified. This research develops and tests a Dual-Pathway Calibration Model (DPCM) integrating dual-process theory, construal level theory, metacognition theory, and regulatory focus theory to explain how anthropomorphic cues influence cognitive processing in human–artificial intelligence (AI) interaction. Three experiments (N = 832) manipulated anthropomorphism and cue inconsistency, examining metacognitive calibration, regulatory focus, and perceived autonomy as boundary conditions. Results revealed that anthropomorphism activates two parallel pathways: (1) a Social Closeness Pathway engaging System 1 processing through reduced psychological distance and enhanced affective trust (indirect effect = 0.18, 95% CI [0.13, 0.24]) and (2) a Cognitive Evaluation Pathway triggering System 2 processing through perceived uncertainty when cue inconsistency is present (ηp² = 0.06). Metacognitive calibration moderated the AI-reliance–decision-quality relationship (β = 0.17, p = 0.007). Regulatory focus moderated pathway activation, with promotion focus strengthening Pathway A (ηp² = 0.15) and prevention focus strengthening Pathway B (ηp² = 0.05). Anthropomorphism exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship with decision outcomes (quadratic b = −0.05, p = 0.001). These findings extend dual-process theory by specifying conditions triggering intuitive versus analytical processing of anthropomorphic agents, contribute to metacognition theory by demonstrating calibration as a critical determinant of AI-assisted judgment quality, and advance regulatory focus theory by showing motivational orientation shapes social cue processing from artificial agents.

Virtual influencers are increasingly used in influencer marketing, yet it remains unclear whether trust generated by an artificial persona can be transferred to endorsed brands in the same way as trust generated by human influencers. This study examines artificial intelligence (AI)-mediated trust transfer among female consumers by comparing virtual and human influencers across four social media platforms. Drawing on source credibility, parasocial interaction, social presence, trust transfer, and brand attachment perspectives, we propose that influencer type is associated with brand outcomes through three observable social-cue pathways: perceived authenticity, parasocial interaction, and social presence. These cues are expected to be associated with influencer trust, which is then associated with brand trust, brand attachment, purchase intention, and recommendation intention. Using 78,432 female consumer comments from Xiaohongshu, Instagram, Weibo, and Douyin, matched across 12 virtual–human-influencer pairs, we construct text-derived linguistic indicators—proxies rather than validated psychometric constructs—through keyword dictionaries, sentiment classification, and standardized composite scoring. The results show that human influencers are associated with higher perceived authenticity, parasocial interaction, and social presence than virtual influencers. The strongest association in the model is the trust-transfer path from influencer trust to brand trust, and the indirect path is associated with a substantial share of the observed covariation between influencer type and brand attachment. Product type further qualifies these patterns: the human-influencer advantage is stronger for hedonic products than for utilitarian products. These findings suggest that virtual influencers should not be understood as universal substitutes for human influencers. Instead, their effectiveness depends on whether AI-mediated personas can generate the social and authenticity cues that the literature associates with trust transfer in a given product context.