Maha Alamodi alghamdi

Dr. Maha Alamodi alghamdi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 April 2025 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAmani Alharthy
Amani Alharthy
MSMamdouh M. Shubair
Mamdouh M. Shubair
BABadr Faleh Alkhateeb
Badr Faleh Alkhateeb
LALubna Alnaim
Lubna Alnaim
EAEmad Aljohani
Emad Aljohani
AEAshraf A. El-Metwally
Ashraf A. El-Metwally
(1) Background: This study aims to identify the sociodemographic, behavioural, and systemic predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among primary healthcare attendees in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to inform targeted interventions and policy strategies. (2) Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between March and July 2023 across 48 randomly selected primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The target population for this study was adults aged 18 and above attending primary healthcare centers in Riyadh. Multi-stage random sampling was used to recruit participants. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of CRC screening. (3) Results: CRC screening uptake was found to be only 4.2%. Age was a significant predictor, with individuals aged 50–75 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50–2.42) and those aged 75 years or older (AOR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.01–1.87) being more likely to undergo screening compared to younger individuals. Insurance coverage strongly influenced screening behaviour (AOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.37–1.96). Smokers were nearly four times more likely to participate in screening than non-smokers (AOR: 3.87, 95% CI: 3.21–4.69), and physical activity was positively associated with screening (AOR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.11–1.82). (4) Conclusions: CRC screening uptake in Riyadh is critically low, highlighting the need for targeted public health interventions. Key predictors such as age, insurance coverage, smoking, and physical activity underscore the importance of addressing sociodemographic disparities and promoting health awareness. The findings emphasize the need for culturally tailored educational campaigns, improved healthcare access, and enhanced screening programs to increase uptake.

25 November 2024 in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WMWalid Mohamed Abd El Maksoud
Walid Mohamed Abd El Maksoud
YAYasser S. Ahmed
Yasser S. Ahmed
AHAlaa Hamza
Alaa Hamza
MAMaha Alamodi alghamdi
Maha Alamodi alghamdi
MAMohamed Alhashash
Mohamed Alhashash
MSMohamed H. Sultan
Mohamed H. Sultan


Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WMWalid Mohamed Abd El Maksoud
Walid Mohamed Abd El Maksoud
KAKhaled S. Abbas
Khaled S. Abbas
FAFahad Alamri
Fahad Alamri
HAHassan A. Alzahrani
Hassan A. Alzahrani
ADAbdullah A Dalboh
Abdullah A Dalboh
MBMohammed Bawahab
Mohammed Bawahab
Background/Objectives: Rapid weight loss after bariatric surgery is linked to a higher risk of symptomatic gallstone disease, which could require a cholecystectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of conducting laparoscopic cholecystectomy concurrently with sleeve gastrectomy in morbid obese patients. Methods: Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for this review. Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and ROB2 for randomized clinical trials. Eight of thirteen studies were high-quality. Pooling for BMI difference and LOS was used to measure efficacy, and the pooled proportion was utilized to assess safety through bleeding, wound infection, and leakage. Heterogeneity was explained via leave-one-out analysis and meta-regression. Results: The pooled standardized mean difference in BMI peri-operation was 3.26 (95% CI: 2.51–4.01, p < 0.01), where the age and initial BMI explained 98% of the heterogeneity through meta-regression. The pooled mean of LOS was 3.18 days (95% CI: 2.23–4.14, I2 = 99%, p < 0.001), where age explained 33.22% of the heterogeneity through meta-regression. The pooled proportion of bleeding was 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02–0.04, I2 = 2%, p = 0.42). The pooled wound infection was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02–0.08, I2 = 80%, p < 0.001), where age accounted for 99% of the heterogeneity. The pooled biliary/gastric leakage was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01–0.05, I2 = 0, p = 0.52). Conclusions: These findings indicate that the combined procedures can be executed with an acceptable safety profile. The heterogeneity in outcomes underscores the necessity of personalized patient care, standardized perioperative practices, and continuous research to enhance results and mitigate dangers.

1 April 2024 in Journal of Surgical Case Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMohammed N. AlAli
Mohammed N. AlAli
AAAya K AlDayel
Aya K AlDayel
AAAfraj T Alshammari
Afraj T Alshammari
MEMohamed S Essa
Mohamed S Essa
MAMaha Alamodi alghamdi
Maha Alamodi alghamdi
KAKhalid S Ahmad
Khalid S Ahmad
Gastric schwannomas (GS) are rare mesenchymal tumors from Schwann cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, representing 2–6% of such tumors. We report a 52-year-old woman who experienced abdominal pain, hematemesis, and melena, initially suspected of having a GI stromal tumor through ultrasound and computed tomography abdomen. Despite no active bleeding found during an upper endoscopy, she underwent a successful open subtotal gastrectomy, with histopathology confirming GS. The diagnosis of GS, which may mimic other GI conditions, relies heavily on imaging and histopathological analysis due to its nonspecific symptomatology, including the potential for both upper and lower GI bleeding. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges of GS and highlights surgical resection as the preferred treatment, generally leading to a favorable prognosis.

6 March 2025 in Critical Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HAHassan A. Alzahrani
Hassan A. Alzahrani
MAMohammad Tauheed Ahmad
Mohammad Tauheed Ahmad
AAAmjd S. Algarni
Amjd S. Algarni
RARana K. Althumairi
Rana K. Althumairi
YAYazan A. Almaker
Yazan A. Almaker
FAFahad Alamri
Fahad Alamri