CAR-T cell therapy has significantly improved outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but challenges such as limited resources, manufacturing timelines, and notable toxicities persist. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), including glofitamab and epcoritamab, have demonstrated promising efficacy and represent a new treatment option in patients who are unsuitable for or have relapsed following CAR-T therapy. Bispecific antibodies have a manageable safety profile and are generally more widely accessible than CAR-T cell therapy. Case discussions in this paper illustrate the potential real-world application of BsAbs, highlighting their role in treating patients who have relapsed after or are unable to undergo CAR-T cell therapy. Overall, glofitamab and epcoritamab represent valuable treatment options in the evolving landscape of R/R DLBCL.
One challenge of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is achieving disease control during manufacturing. We report real-word outcomes of 100 patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, n = 50) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel, n = 50) at our center. Most patients received bridging therapy (BT) with 48 undergoing radiation BT (RBT) and 32 receiving systemic BT (SBT). The best overall response rate (ORR) was 84% (78% complete response (CR)) for axi-cel and 60% (42% CR) for tisa-cel. At a median follow-up of 16 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 72% and 82% for axi-cel, compared to 35% and 57% for tisa-cel. By the bridging approach, 12-month PFS was 60% with RBT, 59% without BT and 35% with SBT (p = 0.06). Notably, axi-cel patients without lymphoma progression during manufacturing (n = 24) achieved 12-month PFS and OS rates of 91% and 96%, respectively. Axi-cel was associated with more cytokine release syndrome (92% vs. 66%, p = 0.003) and neurotoxicity (all-grade 56% vs. 10%, p < 0.001, grade ≥ 328% vs. 4%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified RBT as independently associated with improved PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22–0.96). Pending prospective validation, RBT shows promise for improving CAR-T outcomes in LBCL.
Individuals diagnosed with hematological cancer often face an emotionally demanding journey, frequently reporting high levels of distress and unmet needs, including a lack of personalized and emotional support. Our research team co-developed structured support provided by trained Accompanying patients (APs) during key stages of the care pathway for individuals with hematological cancers treated with cellular therapies. This paper presents findings on the anticipated needs that APs can address, their role within the care team, and the key facilitators, challenges, and strategies needed to implement structured peer support. Using a participatory action research approach, three working sessions were conducted with 16 key stakeholders to co-develop the structured support pathways. Data from group discussions (n = 3) underwent thematic analysis to identify essential components for adapting the support offered by APs, as well as the barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Findings show that APs can help address a wide range of practical, emotional, social, and psychological needs while enhancing patient understanding and continuity of care. Participants emphasized the importance of clear role definitions, adequate training, and supportive tools to ensure the safe and effective involvement of APs. Organizational and communication challenges were also identified, along with strategies to promote long-term sustainability. This initiative represents the first structured peer support program tailored to cellular therapies in Canada and offers a promising model to improve patient experience, foster relational continuity, and support cancer survivors across the care continuum.
CAR-T cell therapy has significantly improved outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but challenges such as limited resources, manufacturing timelines, and notable toxicities persist. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), including glofitamab and epcoritamab have demonstrated promising efficacy and represent a new treatment option in patients who are unsuitable for or have relapsed following CAR-T therapy. Bispecific antibodies have a manageable safety profile and are generally more widely accessible than CAR T-cell therapy. Case discussions in this paper illustrate the potential real-world application of BsAbs, highlighting their role in treating patients who have relapsed after or are unable to undergo CAR T-cell therapy. Overall, glofitamab and epcoritamab represent valuable treatment options in the evolving landscape of R/R DLBCL.
(1) Background: Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) can be delivered in ambulatory healthcare settings; however, the safe and effective management of potential side effects, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), requires protocolized monitoring and management. (2) Methods: An Expert Working Group (EWG) of nine hematologists from across Canada, with experience in leading BsAb program implementation, combined a review of published literature, a comparison of national/provincial/regional guidance documents and protocols, and their professional experiences to produce an informed framework for BsAb program implementation in various healthcare settings. (3) Results: The EWG supports and recommends the progression of BsAb provision from predominantly inpatient hospital settings to community/ambulatory care settings closer to the patient’s home. A seven-step implementation process is outlined to support the safe and effective establishment of such programs, from establishing leadership, through customization of protocols, to education and execution. Strategies and considerations are offered to overcome potential barriers and empower healthcare professionals who are working to establish or improve BsAb programs across Canada. (4) Conclusions: For patients with R/R DLBCL, the safe and effective provision of BsAbs closer to home is both feasible and preferred. This guidance is intended to support the efficient and effective setup or enhancement of BsAb programs in lymphoma.
Background: Richter transformation (RT) is defined as the histologic transformation of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) to either diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or Hodgkin lymphoma. Transformation into lymphoproliferative neoplasms with plasmablastic differentiation is exceptionally rare and poorly characterized. Case Presentation: We present the first case of a patient with CLL evolving into plasmablastic myeloma (PBM). A 62-year-old man with previously treated CLL developed thrombocytopenia and rapidly progressive acute kidney injury. Serum electrophoresis showed new IgA-λ protein (2.2 g/L) with λ and κ light chains at 3445.4 and 7.3 mg/L. Bone marrow examination showed extensive infiltration (>95%) by plasmablasts and mature plasma cells, with a consistent immunophenotype (CD38+, CD138+, MUM1+, CD19−, CD20−). In situ hybridization with EBER was negative. Mutation assessment by NGS demonstrated a TP53 mutation and FISH prob panel revealed a new del17p. Clonal relatedness was confirmed by shared IGHV somatic hypermutation using NGS. The patient was primary refractory to frontline myeloma therapy with Dara-VRd and succumbed rapidly to his disease. Discussion: This case illustrates an exceptionally rare form of RT. Recognition and incorporation in new classifications of plasmablastic RT as a distinct entity is critical, as its biology and resistance profile differ from classical RT.