Thomas Pütz

Dr. Thomas Pütz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2014 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DVDavid Vonberg
David Vonberg
JVJan Vanderborght
Jan Vanderborght
NCNils Cremer
Nils Cremer
TPThomas Pütz
Thomas Pütz
MHMichael Herbst
Michael Herbst
HVHarry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken

5 May 2015 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SGS. Gebler
S. Gebler
HFHarrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
TPThomas Pütz
Thomas Pütz
HPH. Post
H. Post
MSM. Schmidt
M. Schmidt
HVHarry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken
This study compares actual evapotranspiration (ETa) measurements by a set of six weighable lysimeters, ETa estimates obtained with the eddy covariance (EC) method, and evapotranspiration calculated with the full-form Penman–Monteith equation (ETPM) for the Rollesbroich site in the Eifel (western Germany). The comparison of ETa measured by EC (including correction of the energy balance deficit) and by lysimeters is rarely reported in the literature and allows more insight into the performance of both methods. An evaluation of ETa for the two methods for the year 2012 shows a good agreement with a total difference of 3.8% (19 mm) between the ETa estimates. The highest agreement and smallest relative differences (< 8%) on a monthly basis between both methods are found in summer. ETa was close to ETPM, indicating that ET was energy limited and not limited by water availability. ETa differences between lysimeter and EC were mainly related to differences in grass height caused by harvest and the EC footprint. The lysimeter data were also used to estimate precipitation amounts in combination with a filter algorithm for the high-precision lysimeters recently introduced by Peters et al. (2014). The estimated precipitation amounts from the lysimeter data differ significantly from precipitation amounts recorded with a standard rain gauge at the Rollesbroich test site. For the complete year 2012 the lysimeter records show a 16 % higher precipitation amount than the tipping bucket. After a correction of the tipping bucket measurements by the method of Richter (1995) this amount was reduced to 3%. With the help of an on-site camera the precipitation measurements of the lysimeters were analyzed in more detail. It was found that the lysimeters record more precipitation than the tipping bucket, in part related to the detection of rime and dew, which contribute 17% to the yearly difference between both methods. In addition, fog and drizzle explain an additional 5.5% of the total difference. Larger differences are also recorded for snow and sleet situations. During snowfall, the tipping bucket device underestimated precipitation severely, and these situations contributed also 7.9% to the total difference. However, 36% of the total yearly difference was associated with snow cover without apparent snowfall, and under these conditions snow bridges and snow drift seem to explain the strong overestimation of precipitation by the lysimeter. The remaining precipitation difference (about 33%) could not be explained and did not show a clear relation to wind speed. The variation of the individual lysimeters devices compared to the lysimeter mean are small, showing variations up to 3% for precipitation and 8% for evapotranspiration.

3 December 2020 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJacques Roy
Jacques Roy
FRFrançois Rineau
François Rineau
HBHans De Boeck
Hans De Boeck
INIvan Nijs
Ivan Nijs
TPThomas Pütz
Thomas Pütz
AMAlexandru Milcu
Alexandru Milcu
Ecosystems integrity and services are threatened by anthropogenic global changes. Mitigating and adapting to these changes require knowledge of ecosystem functioning in the expected novel environments, informed in large part through experimentation and modelling. This paper describes 13 advanced controlled environment facilities for experimental ecosystem studies, herein termed ecotrons, open to the international community. Ecotrons enable simulation of a wide range of natural environmental conditions in replicated and independent experimental units while measuring various ecosystem processes. This capacity to realistically control ecosystem environments is used to emulate a variety of climatic scenarios and soil conditions, in natural sunlight or through broad‐spectrum lighting. The use of large ecosystem samples, intact or reconstructed, minimizes border effects and increases biological and physical complexity. Measurements of concentrations of greenhouse trace gases as well as their net exchange between the ecosystem and the atmosphere are performed in most ecotrons, often quasi continuously. The flow of matter is often tracked with the use of stable isotope tracers of carbon and other elements. Equipment is available for measurements of soil water status as well as root and canopy growth. The experiments ran so far emphasize the diversity of the hosted research. Half of them concern global changes, often with a manipulation of more than one driver. About a quarter deal with the impact of biodiversity loss on ecosystem functioning and one quarter with ecosystem or plant physiology. We discuss how the methodology for environmental simulation and process measurements, especially in soil, can be improved and stress the need to establish stronger links with modelling in future projects. These developments will enable further improvements in mechanistic understanding and predictive capacity of ecotron research which will play, in complementarity with field experimentation and monitoring, a crucial role in exploring the ecosystem consequences of environmental changes.

9 April 2019 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJannis Groh
Jannis Groh
TPThomas Pütz
Thomas Pütz
HGHorst Herbert Gerke
Horst Herbert Gerke
JVJ. Vanderborght
J. Vanderborght
HVHarry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken
Evapotranspiration (ET) is, after precipitation, the second largest flux at the land surface in the water cycle and occurs mainly during daytime. Less attention has been given to water fluxes from the land surface into the atmosphere during nighttime (i.e., between sunset and sunrise). The nighttime ET (ETN) may be estimated based on models that use meteorological data; however, due to missing experimental long‐term data, the verification of ETN estimates is limited. In this paper, the amount of ETN for two grassland ecosystems was determined from highly temporally resolved and precise weighing lysimeter data. We found that annual ETN ranged between 3.5% and 9.5% of daytime annual ET (ETD) and occurred mainly during wet soil and canopy surface conditions, which suggests that ETN is largely related to evaporation. ETN was positively correlated with wind speed. Dew formation, ranging from 4.8% to 6.4% of annual precipitation, was in absolute terms larger than ETN. The prediction of ETN with the Penman‐Monteith model improved if the aerodynamic and surface resistance parameters were based on vegetation height observations and the nighttime stomatal resistance parameter was assumed to be zero. The occurrence of hot days during the observation period showed to increase average ETN rates. Our results suggest that ETN can be observed with precision weighing lysimeters, was a not negligible component in the water balance of the grassland ecosystems, and thus needs more attention when simulating land surface hydrological processes.

13 March 2020 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJannis Groh
Jannis Groh
JVJan Vanderborght
Jan Vanderborght
TPThomas Pütz
Thomas Pütz
HVHans-Jörg Vogel
Hans-Jörg Vogel
RGRalf Gründling
Ralf Gründling
HGHorst Herbert Gerke
Horst Herbert Gerke
Future crop production will be affected by climatic changes. In several regions, the projected changes in total rainfall and seasonal rainfall patterns will lead to lower soil water storage (SWS), which in turn affects crop water uptake, crop yield, water use efficiency (WUE), grain quality and groundwater recharge. Effects of climate change on those variables depend on the soil properties and were often estimated based on model simulations. The objective of this study was to investigate the response of key variables in four different soils and for two different climates in Germany with a different aridity index (AI): 1.09 for the wetter (range: 0.82 to 1.29) and 1.57 for the drier (range: 1.19 to 1.77) climate. This is done by using high-precision weighable lysimeters. According to a “space-for-time” (SFT) concept, intact soil monoliths that were moved to sites with contrasting climatic conditions have been monitored from April 2011 until December 2017. Evapotranspiration (ET) was lower for the same soil under the relatively drier climate, whereas crop yield was significantly higher, without affecting grain quality. Especially “non-productive” water losses (evapotranspiration out of the main growing period) were lower, which led to a more efficient crop water use in the drier climate. A characteristic decrease of the SWS for soils with a finer texture was observed after a longer drought period under a drier climate. The reduced SWS after the drought remained until the end of the observation period which demonstrates carry-over of drought from one growing season to another and the overall long-term effects of single drought events. In the relatively drier climate, water flow at the soil profile bottom showed a small net upward flux over the entire monitoring period as compared to downward fluxes (groundwater recharge) or drainage in the relatively wetter climate and larger recharge rates in the coarser- as compared to finer-textured soils. The large variability of recharge from year to year and the long-lasting effects of drought periods on the SWS imply that long-term monitoring of soil water balance components is necessary to obtain representative estimates. Results confirmed a more efficient crop water use under less-plant-available soil moisture conditions. Long-term effects of changing climatic conditions on the SWS and ecosystem productivity should be considered when trying to develop adaptation strategies in the agricultural sector.

1 January 2018 in Vadose Zone Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPThomas Pütz
Thomas Pütz
JFJohann Fank
Johann Fank
MFMarkus Flury
Markus Flury
Core Ideas: Lysimeters bridge the gap between laboratory and field experiments. Lysimeters allow the measurement of a complete water balance. Lysimeters provide a complete mass balance for a representative ecosystem segment. Lysimeters are methodological experimental tools to study the water and matter fluxes in the vadose zone, as well as the environmental fate of chemicals. Lysimeters are available in various types. The most sophisticated lysimeters are filled monolithically, are equipped with a pressure‐controlled lower boundary, and are weighable, allowing the measurement of hydraulic fluxes, i.e., rainfall, drainage, evapotranspiration, dew, and hoar frost with high precision. This special section of Vadose Zone Journal reports on current lysimeter research.