Introduction: Severe Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients may not show improvement after a single course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Current treatment options include either a second course of IVIg or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). This systematic review aims to evaluate the current literature on the use of a second course of IVIg or TPE in patients who fail to show clinical improvement after the first IVIg course. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline databases up until 26 October 2023. Studies that evaluated adult patients with confirmed GBS who have failed one full course of IVIg and subsequently received either repeat IVIg or TPE were included. Risk of bias was performed using study-specific checklists. A narrative synthesis of results is presented. Results: A total of 37 articles were identified (1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 3 observational and 33 case reports/series), consisting of 422 patients in total. 12 studies evaluated repeat IVIg and 24 studies evaluated TPE after IVIg. There was no superiority of a repeat course of IVIg or TPE in all clinical outcome measures. Conclusions: The evidence suggests with a low degree of certainty that there is no beneficial effect of further IVIg in unresponsive GBS. The quality of evidence regarding TPE after IVIg is insufficient to suggest any efficacy due to a lack of RCTs. We recommend standardised case reporting with consideration for a multinational case registry and RCTs to determine the efficacy of TPE after initial IVIg unresponsiveness.

Background/Objectives: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) are common, with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) achieved in approximately 25% of patients. However, it remains unknown whether post-ROSC care delivered by a pre-hospital critical care team (CCT) improves patient outcomes. We therefore aimed to investigate this in OHCA patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, consecutive adults with ROSC after non-traumatic OHCA admitted to our ICU between 1 September 2019 and 31 August 2022 were included. We compared patients who received post-ROSC care from a CCT to those who received standard care. The primary outcome was a good neurological outcome on hospital discharge (defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1–2). Descriptive statistics, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) values, and adjusted Odds Ratios (ORs) are reported. We constructed multivariable logistic regression models that adjusted for the component variables of the MIRACLE2 score. Results: We included 126 OHCAs (median age 63 years, 69% male), which were largely witnessed (82%), involved bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (87%), and had an initial shockable rhythm (61%). The prevalence of good neurological outcomes was higher in patients who received post-ROSC care from a pre-hospital CCT (37% vs. 17%, p = 0.012). The MIRACLE2 score was a strong predictor of good neurological outcomes (AUC 0.932), and in our multivariable analysis, good neurological outcome was associated with both CCT presence post-ROSC (aOR 3.77, 95% CI 1.02–13.89) and the delivery of PHEA (aOR 4.10, 95% CI 1.10–15.27, p = 0.035). Furthermore, in patients meeting the Utstein criteria (n = 69), good neurological outcomes were also more prevalent with CCT presence post-ROSC (62% vs. 29%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found that post-ROSC care delivered by a pre-hospital CCT was associated with good neurological outcomes on hospital discharge.

Background: Mechanical ventilation is a common and often lifesaving intervention that is utilised in intensive care. However, the practices can vary between centres. Through this national survey we aim to gain more information about different strategies adopted across the UK. Methods: All adult intensive care units in the UK were approached to participate. The questionnaire was developed with an electronic survey engine and conducted between 09/11/2023 and 01/04/2024 (Survey Monkey ^® ). The survey included questions on ventilator modes, settings, protocols/pathways, rescue strategies, immediate post-extubation period and follow-up. Results: There were 196 responses from 104 hospitals. The most widely adopted start-up ventilation mode was pressure-regulated volume-controlled mode. For acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), most of respondents reported full (39.8%) or partial compliance (58.1%) with the ARDSnet protocol, with PEEP settings being the commonest deviation. Prone positioning (99.0%), followed by recruitment manoeuvres (91.3%) were commonly used rescue measures during AHRF. APRV (55.7%), inhaled (51.3%) and systemic pulmonary vasodilators (44.1%) were also commonly used. Conservative oxygen targets (SaO ₂ of 88%–92%) were commonly adopted (70.6%). As a care bundle, intermittent ETT cuff pressure monitoring was more common (65.5%) than continuous cuff pressure monitoring (20.0%). Propofol and alfentanil were the most common initial sedative and analgesia (99.5% and 56.9%) respectively. Routine volatile anaesthetic use was rare. Conclusions: Our survey has shown significant variation of practice in common but crucial elements of management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. We hope the results in our survey highlight potential future areas of research. Collaborators: South-coast Peri-operative Audit and Research Collaborative (SPARC) Severn Trainee Anaesthetic and Critical Care Research group (STAR) Collaborative research in Anaesthesia in the Northeast (CRANE)

We report a case using a novel ultrasound technique to diagnose suspected bowel perforation in the presence of peritoneal fluid. Our technique removed the need for radiological confirmation and expedited surgical intervention. This highlights the potential for using this bedside ultrasonographic technique to detect free peritoneal gas in the presence of peritoneal fluid secondary to viscus perforation.