Synnøve Heggedal Moltudal

Dr. Synnøve Heggedal Moltudal


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 July 2019 in Designs for Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSynnøve Heggedal Moltudal
Synnøve Heggedal Moltudal
RKRune Krumsvik
Rune Krumsvik
LJLise Øen Jones
Lise Øen Jones
OEOle Johan Eikeland
Ole Johan Eikeland
BJBurke Johnson
Burke Johnson

9 July 2025 in Educational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Siv Måseidvåg GamlemSiv Måseidvåg Gamlem
Siv Måseidvåg Gamlem
JMJoshua McGrane
Joshua McGrane
CBChristian Brandmo
Christian Brandmo
SMSynnøve Heggedal Moltudal
Synnøve Heggedal Moltudal
SSSundance Zhihong Sun
Sundance Zhihong Sun
THTherese N. Hopfenbeck
Therese N. Hopfenbeck

11 February 2022 in Frontiers in Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMSynnøve Heggedal Moltudal
Synnøve Heggedal Moltudal
RKRune Johan Krumsvik
Rune Johan Krumsvik
KHKjetil Laurits Høydal
Kjetil Laurits Høydal
The aim of this study is to explore the introduction of Adaptive Learning Technology (ALT) and inherent Learning Analytics (LA) in the classroom management and professionalism of teachers in a primary education real-life context. ALT is characterized by an inherent opportunity to personalize curriculum and learning experiences for each individual learner and to support teacher-facilitated learning. In this mixed methods study, we explore upper-primary teachers understanding of ALT application in real-life context, and we take a closer look at their experiences with ALT in their own context and practice through three different methodological lenses. The study offers insight into how teachers think and reason as they integrate ALT in their practice and addresses advantages and disadvantages of using ALT technology in primary education learning ecologies. The study also aims to discuss some more general implications of applying ALT and LA in primary and secondary level learning ecologies and concludes that automated system affordances and constraints can create new challenges for teachers, which exceeds teachers’ digital competence and ability to make use of certain real and perceived affordances.


31 March 2025 in Frontiers in Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSynnøve Heggedal Moltudal
Synnøve Heggedal Moltudal
SGSiv M. Gamlem
Siv M. Gamlem
MSMeerita Segaran
Meerita Segaran
IEIrina Engeness
Irina Engeness
\N\ R\ Nsynn
\ R\ Nsynn
This study explores students’ conceptions and experiences with feedback as integrated parts of a three draft writing process and group discussions in English as a foreign language (EFL) in three schools. The students (n = 106, six classes) were following the same draft writing process design during a full school day. The same assignment was given to all participating students, but different feedback contexts were assigned in each school. Half of the students received AI-generated feedback (context 1), while the remaining received peer feedback (context 2). Observations were conducted in all classes during the writing assignment. Individual interviews with students (n = 22) were used to investigate students’ experiences during the draft writing process, and the interviews were thematically analyzed. We find that while AI-generated feedback information supported students dialogic feedback interactions the peer feedback context allowed for students to rehearse their assessment and feedback strategies. The study also reveals that peer feedback for lower secondary school students is challenging, since the students function as both feedback givers, receivers and users during the draft writing process. Key aspects regarding how the students engaged with AI-generated feedback and peer feedback are discussed and we find that both feedback contexts have the potential to develop feedback literacy among lower secondary school students. Our study can contribute to the growing understanding of the relationship between feedback contexts, lower secondary students’ uptake of feedback, and how feedback literacy could be developed.

14 January 2026 in Teaching and Teacher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Siv Måseidvåg GamlemSiv Måseidvåg Gamlem
Siv Måseidvåg Gamlem
SJSamantha-Kaye Johnston
Samantha-Kaye Johnston
SMSynnøve Heggedal Moltudal
Synnøve Heggedal Moltudal
JMJoshua McGrane
Joshua McGrane
THTherese N. Hopfenbeck
Therese N. Hopfenbeck