Background: The poor response to current PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in lung cancer patients requires development of novel immunotargets. Immunoglobulin-like transcript (ILT)4 is an immunosuppressive molecule mainly expressed in myeloid innate cells. Recent studies showed that ILT4 was highly expressed in multiple malignant cells and regulated tumor biologies including proliferation, invasion and metastasis. However, the immunomodulatory role of tumor cell-derived ILT4 is unclear. Here we aimed to analyze the correlation of tumor cell ILT4 expression with T cell infiltration and subset distribution, illustrate ILT4-regulated immunosuppressive microenvironment, and raise tumor cell-derived ILT4 as a novel immunotherapeutic target and prognostic biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. Methods: We collected the tissue samples and corresponding clinicopathological data from 216 primary LUAD patients. Using immunohistochemical staining and public database analyses we investigated the relationship between ILT4 expression and different T cell subset density as well as patient outcomes. Results: Enriched ILT4 expression in tumor cells of LUAD tissues indicated reduced T cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME), advanced diseases and poor patient overall survival (OS). Further T cell subset analyses revealed that ILT4 expression was correlated with decreased CD8⁺T cell and increased Treg frequency in both cancer nest and stroma, but not with altered CD4⁺T cell frequency. High ILT4 level combined with low CD8⁺T cell/high Treg density predicted markedly poorer clinical outcomes compared with any of these biomarkers alone. Conclusions: Tumor cell-derived ILT4 is correlated with immunosuppressive T cell subset infiltration and poor clinical outcomes, and might be a potential immunotherapeutic target and prognostic biomarker for LUAD patients. Combined ILT4 expression and CD8⁺ T cell/Treg frequency in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are stronger predictors for patient outcomes.

Background: Patients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors frequently encounter unusual side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the correlation of irAEs development with clinical response in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unknown. Method: This retrospective study enrolled 244 stage IV SCLC patients who receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors from 3 cancer centers. The correlation of irAEs with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: 140 in 244 (57%) patients experienced irAEs, with 122 (87.1%) experiencing one and 18 (12.9%) experiencing two or more. Compared to patient without irAEs, those developing irAEs had higher ORR (73.6% vs. 52.9%, P < 0.001) and DCR (97.9% vs. 79.8%, P < 0.001), as well as prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 4.5 months, P < 0.001) and OS (23.2 vs. 21.6 months, P < 0.05). Among the different spectra of irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, rash, and pneumonitis were the most powerful indicator for improved PFS. When analyzed as a time-dependent covariate, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with significant improvement in PFS rather than in OS. Furthermore, patients experiencing multisystem irAEs displayed a longer PFS and OS compared with single-system irAEs and the irAE-free ones. IrAEs grade and steroid use did not impact the predictive value of irAEs on PFS. Conclusion: The presence of irAEs predicts superior clinical benefit in SCLC. Patients who develop multi-system irAEs may have an improved survival than those developed single-system irAEs and no-irAEs. This association persists even when systemic corticosteroids were used for irAEs management.

Background: Chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (IC), bevacizumab (BC), or both (IBC) is the preferred first-line therapy for PD-L1-negative and oncogenic-driver wild-type metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. However, the optimal strategy is still undetermined. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled PD-L1-negative metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients from four cancer centers between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2022. All the patients received IC, BC, or IBC as the first-line therapies. The efficacy and safety were evaluated. Results: A total of 205 patients were included, with 60, 83, and 62 patients in IC, BC, and IBC groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics among three groups were well balanced. Patients treated with IBC had the highest objective response rate (ORR) (43.5%) and disease control rate (DCR) (100%) relative to those treated with IC (40.4%, 84.2%) or BC (40.5%, 96.2%) (ORR: P = 0.919, DCR: P < 0.01). Compared with the IC (6.74 m) or BC (8.28 m), IBC treatment significantly improved median progression-free survival (mPFS) (9.53 m, P = 0.005). However, no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed. When stratified by different clinical and molecular information, we found that male gender, ever smoking, wild-type genes mutations, and adrenal metastasis predict superior PFS benefit when treated with IBC. In patients with liver metastasis, IBC or BC treatment displayed better PFS compared with IC. No additional adverse reactions were observed in IBC group compared with other two groups. Conclusion: Combined IBC treatment achieved superior DCR and PFS compared with IC or BC in patients with PD-L1-negative metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, while did not increase the adverse events.

Infiltration of immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) induced colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and its resistance to immunotherapy. Identification of tumor‐specific factors to modulate inhibitory immunocyte infiltration would provide alternative and novel targets for CRC immunotherapy. Immunoglobulin‐like transcript (ILT) 5 is a negative regulator of myeloid cell activation. However, its expression and functional role in solid tumors is still unknown. Using human CRC tissues and cell lines, we found that ILT5 was highly expressed in CRC cells compared with normal colorectal epithelial cells. Enriched ILT5 in tumor cells was correlated with advanced tumor stages and poor patient survival. Our subsequent in vitro and in vivo studies revealed that tumor‐derived ILT5 inhibited the infiltration of T cells, especially that of CD8⁺ T cells in the TME, creating suppressive T‐cell contexture. Furthermore, ILT5 directed M2‐like polarization of tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs). Inhibition of tumor‐derived ILT5 restored the immunosuppressive T‐cell and TAM contexture, and restricted CRC progression. Our findings identified ILT5 expression in solid tumor cells for the first time and raised ILT5 as a potential immunotarget and prognostic predictor in CRC.