Background: The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease has been repeatedly addressed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), although outcomes from real-life clinical studies are still poorly investigated. Objectives: This retrospective study aimed to assess the complete 5-year outcomes for individuals with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) involving LMCA disease treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as recommended by a local HT. Methods: From 2016 to 2019, 176 Heart Team (HT) meetings were held. Primary and secondary endpoints of 267 patients with MVD involving LMCA disease qualified either for CABG or PCI (109 and 158 patients, respectively) with subsequent optimal medical therapy (OMT) were assessed. The primary endpoint of the study was as an overall mortality, while secondary endpoints contained major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)—specifically, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization (RR), and the individual components of MACCE. Results: At 5 years, we found no significant difference in overall mortality between the both cohorts (22.9%-CABG vs. 24.7%-PCI, p = 0.74). The rate of MI was higher in patients treated percutaneously (7.3% vs. 15.8% for PCI, p = 0.04), while the incidence of stroke was higher in patients who underwent CABG (3.8% vs. 11.0% for CABG, p = 0.02). A MACCE occurrence was higher in PCI cohort (77.2% vs. 55.0%, p < 0.001), mainly driven by higher rates of RR was higher in patients treated percutaneously (32.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: For patients with LMCA disease, neither CABG nor PCI following HT decisions showed overwhelming superiority in real-life clinical practice: occurrence of all-cause death was similar, rates of MACCE, MI, and repeat revascularization advocated CABG, while incidence of strokes favored PCI.
(1) Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is increasingly used as a treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). There is a need to provide patients with LVAD with long-term care, preferably at home. The implementation of home-based telerehabilitation (HTR) and telecare offers new opportunities in this field. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of HTR and telecare in HF patients with implanted LVAD and evaluate patients’ acceptance of and adherence to HTR. (2) The study enrolled 30 HF patients with recently implanted LVAD (21 Heart Mate III, 9 Heart Ware) (29 males, mean 59 years) who underwent a 12-week telecare and HTR program based on walking, respiratory, and resistance training, five times weekly. HTR was telemonitored with a device adjusted to register electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings and to transmit data via a mobile phone network to the monitoring center. The moments of automatic ECG registration were pre-set and coordinated with exercise. The influence on physical capacity was assessed by comparing changes in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2; [mL/kg/min]) and workload duration (t; [s]) during the cardiopulmonary exercise test. (3) HTR resulted in a significant physical capacity improvement in pVO2 12.5 ± 2.9 vs. 15.1 ± 3.0 (p < 0.001), and workload duration t 628 ± 204 vs. 728 ± 222 (p < 0.001) during the cardiopulmonary exercise test. There were neither deaths nor adverse events during HTR. Patients accepted HTR, including the need for interactive everyday collaboration with the medical team. All patients completed HTR. (4) HTR is a feasible and safe form of rehabilitation that is well-accepted by patients. The adherence to HTCR was high.
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common anatomical malformation occurring in live-born infants and an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality all over the world. Population-based observations have described associations between maternal cardiometabolic disorders and the risk of CHD in offspring. The present article is a narrative review. The aim of this study was to review the epidemiological evidence and clinical observations relating maternal obesity and diabetes mellitus to the risk of CHD in offspring, with particular attention paid to first trimester disturbances of fetal cardiac development and the influence of genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors. Studies have shown that maternal diabetes is a risk factor associated with nearly all subtypes of CHDs in offspring, while obesity and overweight are associated with increased risk for complex defects and outflow tract obstruction and decreased risk for ventricular septal defects. Diabetes and obesity share several phenotypes, which could be transmissible from mother to fetus via the placenta. This means that an increase in maternal glucose could be responsible for the prevalence of CHD in newborns of obese women. On the other hand, maternal diabetes may induce epigenetic modifications in the developing fetus. DNA methylation changes can impact gene expression patterns relevant to heart development. The abovementioned studies are heterogenous, express different opinions and are often difficult to compare. Therefore, the results from these meta-analyses must be interpreted with caution. Optimal diabetes control is responsible for the prevention of oxidative stress in diabetic pregnancies, and a deeper understanding of maternal risk factors holds the potential to improve both prenatal detection of CHDs by identifying at-risk pregnancies and primary prevention of diseases by improving preconception management.
In persistent HPS‐related hypoxemia after LT, prolonged VV‐ECMO can serve as a bridge to recovery when conventional oxygenation strategies fail. Serial contrast‐enhanced echocardiography and multidisciplinary management may support weaning decisions and the management of ECMO‐related complications.