Summary: One of the main targets of river–floodplain restoration is the reconnection of former side channels. While there is information about the overall impact of such measures, far less is known about specific species’ response patterns to hydrological connectivity. The present study examined the composition of aquatic mollusc communities based on the performance of individual species with respect to hydrological connectivity in the Donau‐Auen National Park, Austria. Species’ traits were used to make generalizations about community responses to hydrological changes. We introduced a connectivity parameter (Cd, expressed in days year⁻¹) that could easily be derived from the river hydrograph and altitude of the inflow areas. This parameter integrated several key features of floodplain waterbodies and reflected the cause–effect chain of restoration schemes, thus allowing the outcome of restoration measures to be quantitatively predicted. Endangered rheophilic mollusc species reached higher frequencies as connectivity increased; for most eurytopic molluscs, however, increased connectivity reduced abundance. With respect to species’ traits, the proportion of large gastropods declined continuously with increasing Cd, whereas the percentage of gastropods with globolose shells and the relative number of strongly calcified (thick‐shelled) individuals both increased. Species dominating in isolated sites were characterized by a higher resistance to desiccation, a food preference for higher plants and a preference for less shaded habitats. They matured later and typically had more offspring than rheophilic species. Species number peaked at connectivity (Cd) values of about 1 month year⁻¹. Isolated and lotic habitats hosted significantly fewer mollusc species. Species turnover was highest when Cd was between 0 days and 2 months. Synthesis and applications. Empirical models based on a connectivity parameter can be used to predict the consequences of restoration measures on the aquatic mollusc community in the Donau‐Auen National Park. The analysis of species’ traits also allows general prognoses for other river–floodplain systems. Furthermore, initial results based on other taxa indicate a broad applicability of the parameter. The methodology thus provides both an urgently needed and a practical tool for predicting the impact and success of restoration schemes.

Large river-floodplain systems are hotspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services but are also used for multiple human activities, making them one of the most threatened ecosystems worldwide. There is wide evidence that reconnecting river channels with their floodplains is an effective measure to increase their multi-functionality, i.e., ecological integrity, habitats for multiple species and the multiple functions and services of river-floodplain systems, although, the selection of promising sites for restoration projects can be a demanding task. In the case of the Danube River in Europe, planning and implementation of restoration projects is substantially hampered by the complexity and heterogeneity of the environmental problems, lack of data and strong differences in socio-economic conditions as well as inconsistencies in legislation related to river management. We take a quantitative approach based on best-available data to assess biodiversity using selected species and three ecosystem services (flood regulation, crop pollination, and recreation), focused on the navigable main stem of the Danube River and its floodplains. We spatially prioritize river-floodplain segments for conservation and restoration based on (1) multi-functionality related to biodiversity and ecosystem services, (2) availability of remaining semi-natural areas and (3) reversibility as it relates to multiple human activities (e.g. flood protection, hydropower and navigation). Our approach can thus serve as a strategic planning tool for the Danube and provide a method for similar analyses in other large river-floodplain systems.

Global initiatives have been increasingly focusing on mainstreaming the values of biodiversity and ecosystem services into decision-making at all levels. Due to the accelerated rate at which biodiversity is declining and its consequences for the functioning of ecosystems and subsequently, the services they provide, there is need to develop comprehensive assessments of the services and the benefits nature delivers to society. Based on expert evaluation, we identified relevant flow linkages in the supply-side of the socio-ecological system, i.e. from biodiversity to ecosystem services supply for eight case studies across European aquatic ecosystems covering freshwater, transitional, coastal and marine waters realms. Biological mediated services were considered, as well as those reliant on purely physical aspects of the ecosystem, i.e. abiotic outputs, since both have implications for spatial planning, management and decision-making. Due to the multidimensional nature of ecosystems and their biodiversity, our approach used ecosystem components such as habitats and biota as proxies for biodiversity and as the focal point for linkage identification. Statistical analysis revealed the importance of considering mobile biota in the spatial assessment of habitats. Contrary to literature evidences so far, our results showed significantly different and complementary ecosystem services supply patterns across the continuum of aquatic realms. The implemented score of ecosystem services supply has a high potential for integrated aquatic ecosystem service supply assessments in the context of ecosystem-based management.

The EU Nature Restoration Law represents an important opportunity for freshwater habitat restoration and, consequently, freshwater biodiversity protection. However, a number of challenges must be anticipated in its implementation, which may compromise its success. Some aspects, particularly those relating to freshwater ecosystems, require more clarification. We use riverine ecosystems to illustrate existing ambiguities in the proposed legislation and the potential consequences of leaving these aspects open to interpretation during the implementation process. We also discuss potential solutions to these problems which could help ensure that the law's objectives are met. We argue that river network structure and connectivity dimensions, which result into river meta‐ecosystems, must be explicitly considered. For that purpose, we ask for clear definitions of the critical terms “free‐flowing rivers,” “barriers,” and “reference areas.” In addition, we recommend developing methods for integrated assessment of connectivity across river networks. As a key property of river ecosystems, this must be used to prioritize actions to increase the length and number of free‐flowing rivers. Adequate restoration planning at larger spatial scales will benefit from a meta‐ecosystem perspective and accurate representation of aquatic‐terrestrial linkages, which will significantly improve the efficacy of restoration efforts. Furthermore, stakeholder and citizen engagement offer important opportunities at local, national, and European scales, and should be fostered to ensure inclusive decision‐making. The conservation challenges outlined here are particularly important for rivers, but they also have implications for other ecosystems. These considerations are useful for policymakers, conservationists, and other stakeholders involved in the Nature Restoration Law and related policy initiatives.This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Stresses and Pressures on Ecosystems Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Human Water > Water Governance