James A. Brown

Dr. James A. Brown

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2009 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames A. Brown
James A. Brown
SOSean M. O'BRien
Sean M. O'BRien
CWChangfu Wu
Changfu Wu
JSJo Ann H. Sikora
Jo Ann H. Sikora
BGBartley P. Griffith
Bartley P. Griffith
JGJames S. Gammie
James S. Gammie

1 November 1994 in Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMichael L. Cher
Michael L. Cher
DMDonal MacGrogan
Donal MacGrogan
RBRobert Bookstein
Robert Bookstein
JBJames A. Brown
James A. Brown
RJRobert B. Jenkins
Robert B. Jenkins
RJRonald H. Jensen
Ronald H. Jensen

1 April 1999 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSteven P. Petrou
Steven P. Petrou
JBJames A. Brown
James A. Brown
JBJerry G. Blaivas
Jerry G. Blaivas
Conclusions The success rate of suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis to treat urinary obstruction associated with anti-incontinence procedures compares favorably to that of other described alternative approaches. The success rate in patients with definite urodynamic criteria for obstruction was not significantly better than in those who underwent suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis based on physical examination and clinical judgment. Preoperative maximal urinary flow rate was associated with operative success (p = 0.018), while preoperative post-void residual urine and maximum detrusor pressure failed to reveal a difference between operative success and failure.

1 August 1997 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames A. Brown
James A. Brown
KAKari L. Anderl
Kari L. Anderl
TBThomas J. Borell
Thomas J. Borell
JQJunqi Qian
Junqi Qian
DBDavid G. Bostwick
David G. Bostwick
RJRobert B. Jenkins
Robert B. Jenkins

1 October 1994 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames A. Brown
James A. Brown
AAAntonio Alcaraz
Antonio Alcaraz
STSatoru Takahashi
Satoru Takahashi
DPDiane L. Persons
Diane L. Persons
MLMichael M. Lieber
Michael M. Lieber
RJRobert B. Jenkins
Robert B. Jenkins
Fluorescent in situ hybridization using 12 chromosome enumeration probes (for chromosomes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, X and Y) was used to evaluate fresh tumor touch preparations from 40 randomly selected radical prostatectomy specimens. Of the tumors 16 (40%) contained chromosomal aneusomies. Chromosome 8 was aneusomic in 9 tumors (23%). Gain of chromosome 7 was observed in 8 tumors (20%). Chromosome 17 was aneusomic in 4 cases, and chromosomes 10, 11, 12, 18 and Y were each aneusomic twice. Loss of chromosome 9 was observed in 1 tumor. Chromosomes 4, 6, and X were never aneusomic. The percentage of monosomy 17 nuclei was 2 to 4 times the amount noted with the other autosomes for tumor and benign tissue. Computer analysis demonstrated that these signals contained twice the signal density and were significantly different (p < 0.0001) than the single diploid chromosome 17 signals. This result is consistent with homologous pairing of chromosome 17 in benign and neoplastic prostate tissue. Anomalies of chromosomes 8 and/or 7 were present in 14 of the 16 cases (88%) aneusomic by fluorescent in situ hybridization. High grade tumors were more likely to be aneuploid on fluorescent in situ hybridization (p < 0.001). Tumors with chromosome 8 aneusomies were of higher stage (p < 0.05). Fluorescent in situ hybridization is more sensitive than flow cytometry for the detection of aneusomy/aneuploidy. The prognostic relevance of these findings will require further investigation.

14 November 2016 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAfshin Varzavand
Afshin Varzavand
WHWill Hacker
Will Hacker
DMDeqin Ma
Deqin Ma
KGKatherine Gibson-Corley
Katherine Gibson-Corley
MHMaria Hawayek
Maria Hawayek
CSChristopher S. Stipp
Christopher S. Stipp
Existing anticancer strategies focused on disrupting integrin functions in tumor cells or tumor-involved endothelial cells have met limited success. An alternative strategy is to augment integrin-mediated pathways that suppress tumor progression, but how integrins can signal to restrain malignant behavior remains unclear. To address this issue, we generated an in vivo model of prostate cancer metastasis via depletion of α3β1 integrin, a correlation observed in a significant proportion of prostate cancers. Our data describe a mechanism whereby α3β1 signals through Abl family kinases to restrain Rho GTPase activity, support Hippo pathway suppressor functions, and restrain prostate cancer migration, invasion, and anchorage-independent growth. This α3β1-Abl kinase-Hippo suppressor pathway identified α3 integrin–deficient prostate cancers as potential candidates for Hippo-targeted therapies currently under development, suggesting new strategies for targeting metastatic prostate cancer based on integrin expression. Our data also revealed paradoxical tumor suppressor functions for Abl kinases in prostate cancer that may help to explain the failure of Abl kinase inhibitor imatinib in prostate cancer clinical trials. Cancer Res; 76(22); 6577–87. ©2016 AACR.