Xiong Xiao

Dr. Xiong Xiao

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 February 2023 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QWQingzheng Wang
Qingzheng Wang
QGQingyu Guan
Qingyu Guan
YSYunfan Sun
Yunfan Sun
QDQinqin Du
Qinqin Du
XXXiong Xiao
Xiong Xiao
JMJimin Mi
Jimin Mi

17 October 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHaiping Luo
Haiping Luo
QGQingyu Guan
Qingyu Guan
WSWenyan Shao
Wenyan Shao
QDQinqin Du
Qinqin Du
XXXiong Xiao
Xiong Xiao
JZJun Zhang
Jun Zhang

22 January 2024 in CATENA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XXXiong Xiao
Xiong Xiao
QGQingyu Guan
Qingyu Guan
ZZZepeng Zhang
Zepeng Zhang
HLHanqi Liu
Hanqi Liu
QDQinqin Du
Qinqin Du
TYTingwei Yuan
Tingwei Yuan

10 September 2026 in Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XXXiong Xiao
Xiong Xiao
ZZZepeng Zhang
Zepeng Zhang
JNJingqin Nie
Jingqin Nie
SCShujun Chang
Shujun Chang
FYFujia Yang
Fujia Yang
Vegetation change is regarded as a key indicator of environmental change and ecosystem functional evolution. In mountainous regions, vegetation dynamics arise from complex and non-linear interactions among climate, topography, land use, and human activities, yet the mechanisms governing these interactions remain poorly understood. Clarifying long-term vegetation trajectories and their interacting controls is essential for understanding ecosystem structure and function. In this study, we integrated machine learning and causal modeling by combining random forest (RF) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to quantify both the relative importance and the direct and indirect pathways of natural and anthropogenic drivers of vegetation change in the Longnan region from 2000 to 2020. The RF results showed that the selected driving factors explained 82.62% and 72.39% of the spatial variation in vegetation cover in 2000 and 2020, respectively, with climatic and anthropogenic factors ranking as the most important drivers. Although ecological restoration activities contributed to an overall improvement in vegetation conditions, land-use heterogeneity and ecological constraints imposed by high elevation jointly produced contrasting local responses, resulting in vegetation degradation in surrounding areas. SEM revealed that the net influence of anthropogenic activities shifted from positive to negative over time, mainly due to land-use change, indicating a reorganization of human–vegetation interactions. Climate effects remained positive, with precipitation having a stronger influence than temperature. Topography moderated vegetation responses, as slopes below 40° favored vegetation growth. Soil effects shifted from positive to negative, likely associated with changes in soil organic matter. By jointly applying RF and SEM, this study captures both non-linear responses and causal pathways, providing a system-level perspective on the complex mechanisms underlying vegetation change.