Toby Hall

Dr. Toby Hall

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 February 2018 in Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBenjamin Hidalgo
Benjamin Hidalgo
THToby Hall
Toby Hall
JBJean Bossert
Jean Bossert
ADAxel Dugeny
Axel Dugeny
BCBarbara Cagnie
Barbara Cagnie
LPLaurent Pitance
Laurent Pitance
OBJECTIVE: To review and update the evidence for different forms of manual therapy (MT) and exercise for patients with different stages of non-specific neck pain (NP). Data sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane-Register-of-Controlled-Trials, PEDro, EMBASE. METH

1 August 2007 in Manual Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MOMark Ogince
Mark Ogince
THToby Hall
Toby Hall
KRKim Robinson
Kim Robinson
ABA.M. Blackmore
A.M. Blackmore

1 November 2004 in Manual Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THToby Hall
Toby Hall
KRK. Robinson
K. Robinson

1 May 2008 in Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THToby Hall
Toby Hall
KRKim W. Robinson
Kim W. Robinson
OFOsamu Fujinawa
Osamu Fujinawa
KAKiyokazu Akasaka
Kiyokazu Akasaka
EPElizabeth A. Pyne
Elizabeth A. Pyne
This article evaluates reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test (FRT) to discriminate subjects with headache because of C1/2 dysfunction. In addition, this study evaluates agreement between experienced and inexperienced examiners. These were 2 single blind comparative measurement study designs. In study 1, 2 experienced blinded examiners evaluated the FRT in 10 asymptomatic controls, 20 subjects with cervicogenic headache (CeH) where C1/2 was the primary dysfunctional level, and 10 subjects with CeH but without C1/2 as the primary dysfunctional level. In study 2, 2 inexperienced and 1 experienced blinded examiners evaluated the FRT in 12 subjects with CeH and 12 asymptomatic controls. Examiners were required to state whether the FRT was positive and also to determine range of rotation using a goniometer. An analysis of variance with planned orthogonal comparison, single measure intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1), and Bland-Altman plot were used to analyze FRT range of rotation between the examiners. Sensitivity, specificity, and examiner agreement for test interpretation were analyzed using cross tabulation and kappa. In study 1, sensitivity and specificity of the FRT was 90% and 88% with 92% agreement for experienced examiners (P < .001). Overall diagnostic accuracy was 89% (P < .001) and kappa = 0.85. In study 2, for inexperienced examiners, FRT mobility was significantly greater than for experienced examiners, but sensitivity, specificity, agreement, and kappa values were all within clinically acceptable levels. The FRT can be used accurately and reliably by inexperienced examiners and may be a useful aid in CeH evaluation.

1 March 2007 in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THToby Hall
Toby Hall
HCHo Tak Chan
Ho Tak Chan
LCLene Christensen
Lene Christensen
BOBritta Odenthal
Britta Odenthal
CWCherie Wells
Cherie Wells
KRKim Robinson
Kim Robinson
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. To determine the effect of a C1-C2 self-sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAG) on cervicogenic headache. Cervicogenic headache is a common condition causing significant disability. Recent studies have shown a high incidence of C1-C2 dysfunction, evaluated by the flexion-rotation test (FRT), in subjects with cervicogenic headache. To manage this dysfunction, Mulligan has described a C1-C2 self-SNAG, though no studies have investigated the efficacy of this intervention approach. A sample of 32 subjects (mean _ SD age, 36 +/- 3 years) with cervicogenic headache and FRT limitation were randomized into a C1-C2 self-SNAG or placebo group. After an initial instruction and practice visit in the clinic, interventions consisted of exercises applied independently by the subject twice daily at home on a continual basis. FRT range was measured twice, before and immediately after the instruction and practice visit. Headache symptoms were determined by a headache index over time, assessed by questionnaire preintervention, at 4 weeks postintervention, and at 12 months postintervention. No differences were found in baseline measures between groups. Immediately after the initial instruction and practice visit performed with the supervision of the therapist, FRT range increased by 15 degrees (SD, 9) for the C1-C2 self-SNAG group (P < .001), which was significantly more than 5 degrees (SD, 5) for the placebo intervention (P < .001). There was also a significant interaction for the variable headache index between group and time (P < .001), indicating that group difference was dependent on time. There was no difference in headache index scores at baseline between groups. Headache index scores were substantially less in the C1-C2 self-SNAG group (mean +/- SD points at 4 weeks, 31 +/- 9; mean +/- SD points at 12 months, 24 +/- 9) compared to the placebo group (mean +/- SD points at 4 weeks, 51 +/- 15; mean +/- SD points at 12 months, 44 +/- 13) at 4 weeks (P < .001) and 12 months (P < .001), with an overall (+/-SD) reduction of 54% (+/-17%) for the individuals in the C1-C2 self-SNAG group. These results provide evidence for the efficacy of the C1-C2 self-SNAG technique in the management of individuals with cervicogenic headache.

1 May 1999 in Manual Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THToby Hall
Toby Hall
RER.L. Elvey
R.L. Elvey