Background and Objective: The mediastinum is a complex, heterogeneous area, which leads vertically across the thoracic cavity between the bilateral mediastinal pleurae, connecting the head and neck region with the thoracic cavity. Different classifications have been published to differentiate between the so-called mediastinal compartments while the most used classification surely is the 4-compartments Gray`s classification, dividing it into the superior, anterior, middle and posterior mediastinum. Mediastinal abnormalities include infections (mediastinitis) and solid or cystic mediastinal masses. These masses can be divided into benign and malignant lesions originating from mediastinal structures/organs or represent manifestations of metastatic disease, often metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review aims to explore the different mediastinal pathologies along with indications and surgical approaches. Methods: We performed literature research in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases. Only papers written in English were included. Key Content and Findings: Depending on the indication for surgical intervention and the localization of the pathology, surgical approach may differ immensely. Mediastinal staging of lung cancer, primary lesions of the mediastinum, mediastinitis and traumatic mediastinal injuries display the most frequent indications for mediastinal surgery. Surgical approaches trend towards minimally invasive, video- or robotic-assisted techniques and are becoming increasingly refined to adapt to the special characteristics of the mediastinum. However, certain indications still require open access for best possible mediastinal exposure or oncological reasons. Conclusions: To guide optimal surgical approach selection to the mediastinum, the following overview will present all published surgical approaches to the mediastinum and discuss their practical relevance and indications aiming to help surgeons in the management of patients with mediastinal pathologies who should undergo surgery.

Background: Pulmonary carcinoids are rare tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells in the lungs. Because of their potentially infiltrative nature, surgical resection remains the treatment of choice. However, not all patients with technically resectable disease will be able to undergo surgery, primarily because of poor lung function or medical co-morbidities. Centrally located, intraluminal tumors have been reported to be amenable to bronchoscopic treatment. We specifically examined the role of cryotherapy in the treatment of bronchial carcinoid tumors. Methods: Sixty-three patients (52.38% female) who underwent a combined total of 243 cryotherapy procedures for treatment of bronchial carcinoid between 1992 and 2020 in our institution were included in the study. Following discussion in multidisciplinary meetings, patients were considered for first-line cryotherapy when lung resection was deemed not possible or when they had rejected surgery. Results: Cryotherapy resulted in complete remission in 21 (33.33%) patients with maximum tumor diameter less than 20 mm (mean: 11.08 mm, 95% confidence interval: 8.76-13.40), and allowed 22 (34.92%) patients with larger lesions (mean: 24.04 mm, 95% confidence interval: 18.78-29.30) to proceed with parenchymal sparing resections. Marked symptomatic relief (P<0.001) was reported by 58 (92.06%) patients. The median follow-up was 33 months (range: 0 to 243 mo). One (1.59%) patient was diagnosed with recurrence in a contralateral lobe 3 years after surgery and was treated with radiofrequency ablation. Conclusions: In the absence of a definitive randomized controlled trial comparing bronchoscopic treatment with surgical resection, we provide evidence on the safety and efficacy of cryotherapy and encourage wider adoption of this inexpensive and minimally invasive technique for treatment of bronchial carcinoids.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare condition resulting from the compression of the brachial plexus and/or the subclavian vessels in the thoracic outlet (TO). Neurogenic TOS (NTOS) is the most common form in up to 95% of the cases, while venous TOS (VTOS) occurs in 3–5% and arterial TOS (ATOS) in 1–2% of the cases. Patients may suffer from the pathologic coexistence of arterio-venous compression in the TO called arterio-venous TOS (AVTOS) with an overlap of clinical symptoms. While imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT)-angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-angiography and duplex sonography are helpful to detect the underlying condition in vascular pathologies, electrodiagnostic testing is necessary to distinguish NTOS from other peripheral neuropathies. Subclavian vein (SV)-compression in the TO can result in venous thrombosis, called Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS), named after the discoverers of the disease. Besides oral anticoagulation in cases with venous upper extremity thrombosis and multimodal conservative treatment in the management of NTOS, surgical decompression is the current standard of care for TOS. Surgical decompression aims to remove structures compressing the brachial plexus or the subclavian vasculature in the TO. In NTOS, when conservative management has failed, surgical resection of the 1^st or a cervical rib is often combined with scalenectomy and brachial plexus neurolysis. Minimally invasive techniques have replaced traditionally open supra-, infraclavicular or transaxillary approaches with excellent results and minimal morbidity. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was described to offer better visualization, shorter length of stay (LOS) and less neurovascular injuries attributable to less traction applied. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) moreover, further improved magnification, angulation of the surgical instruments in narrow anatomical spaces and the comfort for the operating surgeon. Uniportal RATS (uRATS) has lately been applied for 1^st rib resection. The aim of this surgical technique manual is to describe and illustrate a RATS 1^st rib resection with its advantages over traditionally open approaches step by step.

OBJECTIVES: Digital transformation has drastically changed the surgical sector, but few is known about its impact on thoracic surgical practice. The aim of this paper is to report the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) survey results, assessing the impact of and the need for Digital Transformation in Thoracic Surgery. METHODS: A 23-item survey was designed by the ESTS Digital Transformation Working Group to assess the impact of and the need for Digital Transformation in Thoracic Surgery. All ESTS members (1668) were invited to complete the survey between 13 March and 21 May 2022 anonymously. Data analysis was descriptive calculating frequencies and percentages. Group comparison was done using chi-square test. RESULTS: The response rate was 6.3%. Surgeons from 26 European countries participated of which more than 80% were based in academic hospitals. The impact of digital transformation was rated very important (43.8%) and fundamental (22.7%) in more than two-thirds of the cases, regardless of surgeons’ age. None of the participants felt that digital transformation was of no importance and more than 85% had implemented digital platforms in their direct patient care. Almost 90% of the surgeons, currently not using digital platforms for training and education, would consider introducing them. About 70% were at least ‘somewhat satisfied’ with their current engagement in Digital Transformation in Thoracic Surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Digital transformation seems to play a major role across European Thoracic Surgery departments in direct patient care, professional networking and surgical training. However, overall satisfaction with the current status of Digital Transformation in Thoracic Surgery was rather reserved, implying the need to increase the implementation of digital solutions in the latter.

Nora Mayer, Peter Kestenholz, Fabrizio Minervini; Resecting less, breathing better?, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, , ezae233, https://doi.or