Purpose: To increase awareness of the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and treatment options for endograft infections. Case Report: A 75-year-old male patient was admitted with suspected endograft infection 4 years after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Although preoperative diagnostics showed no definitive signs of endograft infection, eventual surgical exposure of the endograft revealed signs of advanced inflammation, including the unexpected finding of an aortoduodenal fistula. Conclusion: A detailed evaluation of patient history and clinical examination, performed as a part of routine follow-ups, may be beneficial in identifying possible severe complications after EVAR early on. Regarding options for aortic reconstruction in case of endograft infection, bovine pericardium deserves consideration as a promising, feasible, and easily available graft material.

Endoleaks are the most common complication after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Their correct identification is one of the main objectives of surveillance protocols after EVAR. So far, computed tomography angiography (CTA), contrast-enhanced (CEUS) and Duplex ultrasound (DUS), as well as magnetic resonance angiography, have been investigated for their ability to detect endoleaks. In general, all technologies have distinct benefits and disadvantages, with CTA and CEUS emerging as the reference standard for surveillance after EVAR. However, they are both contrast-enhancer-dependent, and CTA additionally exposes patients to ionizing radiation. In the present study, we investigated B-Flow, a type of coded-excitation ultrasound that was specifically designed to optimize the visualization of blood flow, for its ability to detect endoleaks, and compared its performance to CEUS, CTA, and DUS. In total, 34 patients were included in the analysis that accumulated in 43 distinct B-Flow investigations. They underwent a total of 132 imaging investigations. Agreement between B-Flow and other imaging modalities was high (>80.0%), while inter-method reliability can be interpreted as good. However, with B-Flow, six and one endoleaks would have been missed compared to CEUS and CTA, respectively. Regarding endoleak classification, all metrics were lower but retained an adequate level of comparison. In a subset of patients requiring intervention, B-Flow had 100% accuracy regarding both endoleak detection and classification. Ultrasonography enables endoleak detection and classification without the need for pharmaceutical contrast enhancement or radiation. Ultrasound coded-excitation imaging in the application of B-Flow could further simplify surveillance after EVAR by offering adequate accuracy without requiring intravenous contrast enhancement. Our findings may promote subsequent investigations of coded-excitation imaging for endoleak detection and classification in the surveillance after EVAR.

Objectives: Surveillance after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) is mainly directed by one-size-fits-all approaches instead of personalized decision making, even though treatment strategies and often endografts themselves are tailor-made to adjust for individual patients. We propose a modular imaging algorithm that escalates surveillance imaging based on invasiveness and need. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study of single-center data, results of a modular imaging algorithm were analyzed. The algorithm is characterized by initiating the examination with standard B-mode then transitioning to Duplex ultrasound, B-Flow, and CEUS. Additional CT(A) studies are conducted where required. The study population included both patients receiving EVAR or FEVAR. A comparative analysis was conducted regarding endoleak detection. Results: The study population included 28 patients receiving EVAR and 40 patients receiving FEVAR. They accounted for 101 follow-up visits, which led to 431 distinct imaging studies. CEUS has the highest endoleak detection rate, followed by CTA and B-Flow. Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow resulted in 0 and 1 false positive cases, respectively, considering CEUS the reference standard. In a select group of six patients, CEUS was omitted after endoleaks were displayed by Duplex ultrasound or B-Flow, leading to a successful type II coiling and no aneurysm-related adverse events. Conclusions: The proposed modular algorithm showed great potential to incorporate principles of personalized medicine in surveillance after endovascular aortic treatment. Since Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow rarely cause false positive endoleaks, more resource-intensive and invasive imaging studies such as CEUS and CTA can be omitted after positive identification.

Iliac branch devices (IBDs) are undergoing rapid popularization. They allow for treatment of an iliac aneurysm while preserving blood flow to the hypogastric artery. Certain anatomic criteria are necessary for the use of an iliac side branch device to be technically feasible. Custom-made fenestrated iliac stent grafts may provide an alternative when anatomic criteria for an IBD are not met.

Objective: This study offers a retrospective assessment of a single-center experience using cerebrospinal fluid catheters to reduce the risk of perioperative spinal cord injury in patients undergoing single-staged complex endovascular juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Results: A total of 97 patients were included. On average, 70.7%±14.4% of the aortic segment between the left subclavian artery and the aortic bifurcation was covered during the procedures. Of the 53 patients receiving cerebrospinal fluid drainage, 77.4% were prophylactic and 22.6% were in symptomatic patients. The overall spinal cord injury rate was 12.4%, with 8.3% experiencing transient spinal cord injury with immediate improvement after cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and 4.1% of patients suffering permanent spinal cord injury: 2 (2.1%) with minor deficits and 2 (2.1%) with paraplegia. The mean intraoperatively administered heparin dosage was 7500 international units, and an additional intravenous bolus of acetylsalicylic acid was given in 69 cases (71.1%), whereas the cerebrospinal fluid drain was in situ. Conclusions: The evaluation of the employed in-house protocol for single-staged complex endovascular juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, focusing on cerebrospinal fluid catheter management in conjunction with necessary anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication, indicated that the use of a cerebrospinal fluid catheter is a feasible approach for spinal cord injury risk reduction in selected high-risk patients. Clinical Impact: This study highlights the effectiveness of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) in reducing spinal cord injury (SCI) rates from 12.4% to 4.1% during single-staged complex endovascular repair of juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Implementing CSFD within a standardized protocol achieved a 99.7% target visceral and renal vessel patency without major CSFD-related bleeding complications. These findings emphasize CSFD as a feasible and effective tool for SCI prevention in selected high-risk patients. While supporting on-demand catheter placement, this study underscores the potential of selective prophylactic CSFD use, contributing to safer, evidence-based strategies in managing high-risk aortic repairs.

Background: Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS), Marfan syndrome (MFS), and Loeys–Dietz syndrome (LDS) are connective tissue disorders frequently associated with vascular aneurysm formation, dissections, and subsequent major complications. Regular imaging surveillance is recommended for these conditions. However, no guidelines currently exist regarding imaging modality or surveillance intervals. Methods: This retrospective single-center observational study analyzed clinical and imaging data of patients attending an outpatient clinic for vascular connective tissue disorders between August 2008 and January 2024. Imaging (1424 data points in total) and clinical data were extracted from electronic health records. Analysis primarily included a comparison of vessel diameter progression across imaging modalities, with an additional review of the clinical history of vascular events. Results: In total, 19 patients with vascular connective tissue disorders (vCTDs) underwent consultations at our outpatient clinic. Nine (47.4%) patients experienced vascular events, while two (10.5%) passed away during the study period. Multimodal imaging surveillance revealed a tendency towards arterial diameter increase. Consistent ultrasound monitoring provided more reliable diameter progression data for the same arterial segment than a combination of imaging modalities. Temporal analysis indicated a tendency for the continuous growth of the abdominal aorta, the common and internal carotid artery, and the common femoral and popliteal artery. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of standardized, modality-specific imaging protocols in monitoring patients with vCTDs. The variability in disease progression among these patients further complicates surveillance strategies, contemplating the need for individualized approaches. Further research and prospective multicenter studies are required to refine and improve monitoring protocols.