With the advancement of tunnel construction, the load-bearing capacity of shield tunnel segments is diminishing, while issues of deformation and fissuring are becoming more conspicuous, posing direct threats to structural integrity and functionality. Steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) is considered a prevalent material, endowed with high strength, excellent crack control, fracture toughness, and remarkable economic advantages. This paper surveys the state-of-the-art research on SFRC, systematically encapsulating key aspects regarding its composition, attributes, methods of segment reinforcement, constitutive models for SFRC segments, and performance enhancements of SFRC segments. By optimizing steel fiber content, aggregate preparation, and selection of chemical admixtures, the mechanical performance of SFRC can be augmented, among which the aspect ratio (l/d) and volume fraction (V_f) of steel fibers exert the most significant influence. Compared with conventional reinforcing materials, SFRC possesses benefits of low cost, uncomplicated fabrication, and superior durability. As a heterogeneous multiphase composite, SFRC exhibits high strength, stiffness, and excellent crack resistance, which can amplify the load-bearing capacity and deformation resistance of the segments, defer damage inception, and thereby enhance the safety and durability of tunnel-lining segments. This study assists in redressing the deficiencies of current shield tunnel segment reinforcement technologies and further facilitates the extensive employment of SFRC in tunnel segment strengthening and restoration.

Super sulfate cement (SSC) serves as a sustainable alternative to ordinary Portland cement, offering lower carbon emissions and superior performance. Magnesium oxide (MgO) and building gypsum (BG) were utilized as activators for granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS), and together they formed SSC, which was employed to stabilize the waste soft clay (SC). The mechanical strength development characteristics of solidified clay and the types of its hydration products were investigated through mechanical experiments, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests as well as microscopic experiments, such as X-ray diffraction tests and scanning electron microscopy tests. The mass ratios of GBFS, MgO, and BG were 8:2:0 (A2) and 6:2:2 (B1), respectively; these ratios were employed to stabilize the clay, resulting in solidified clay samples designated as S-A2 and S-B1. The UCS of S-B1 increased by 36.5% to 49.3% compared to S-A2 at the curing time from 7 to 91 days. The strength residual coefficients were 34.5% and 39.1% for S-A2 and S-B1, respectively, after ten wet–dry cycles. After soaking in sodium sulfate solution, the UCS of S-A2 and S-B1 decreased by 49.1% and 29.8%, respectively, compared to the unsoaked condition. The results of microscopic tests showed that the hydration products of S-B1 mainly included needle-like calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel, flaky hydrothermal gel, and ettringite (AFt) crystals. BG promoted the formation of AFt, while MgO facilitated the generation of C-S-H gel. In this study, SSC was used to stabilize the waste clay, which provided a way for the application of waste SC and SSC.

In order to reuse granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and low-strength soft clay (SC), this study developed a curing material using magnesium oxide (MgO) as an alkali activator to excite the GBFS and basalt fiber (BF) as reinforcing material to prepare the SC. The mixing ranges of GBFS, MgO, and BF were established as 9.48%~14.52%, 0.48%~5.52%, and 0%~1.00454% of the dry clay mass, respectively, and the mixing ratios of the three were optimized using the central composite design (CCD) test. Through the analysis of variance, factor interaction analysis, and parameter optimization of the CCD test, the optimal mass ratio of GBFS, MgO, and BF was determined to be 13.35:4.47:0.26. The curing material of this ratio was named GMBF and mixed with SC to prepare GMBF solidified clay. An equal amount of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was taken and formed with SC to form OPC solidified clay. The mechanical properties, durability, and hydration products of GMBF solidified clay were clarified by the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test, freeze–thaw cycle test, X-ray diffraction (XRD) test, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) test. The UCS of the GMBF solidified clay was 1.08 MPa and 2.85 MPa at 7 and 91 days, respectively, which was 45.9% and 33.8% higher than that of the OPC solidified clay (0.74 MPa and 2.13 MPa) at the same curing time. After ten freeze–thaw cycles, the UCS of GMBF and OPC solidified clay decreased from the initial 2.85 MPa and 2.13 MPa to 1.59 MPa and 0.7 MPa, respectively, with decreases of 44.2% and 67.1%, respectively. By XRD and SEM, the hydration products of GMBF solidified clay were mainly calcium silicate hydrate gel and hydrotalcite. The interface bonding and bridging effect formed between BF and SC or hydration products, indicating that these interactions contributed to the solidified clay enhanced structural integrity. This study demonstrates that the CCD approach provides solution for recycling SC and GBFS. Laboratory tests confirm the potential of the optimized GMBF formulation for practical engineering applications.