Natividad Viguria

Dr. Natividad Viguria

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 April 2024 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GEGuillermo Ezpeleta
Guillermo Ezpeleta
ANAna Navascués
Ana Navascués
NVNatividad Viguria
Natividad Viguria
MHMercedes Herranz-Aguirre
Mercedes Herranz-Aguirre
SBSergio Enrique Juan Belloc
Sergio Enrique Juan Belloc
JCJesús Castilla
Jesús Castilla
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is a frequent cause of hospitalisation in the first few months of life; however, this risk rapidly decreases with age. Nirsevimab immunoprophylaxis was approved in the European Union for the prevention of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease in infants during their first RSV season. We evaluated the effectiveness of nirsevimab in preventing hospitalisations for confirmed RSV infection and the impact of a strategy of immunisation at birth. A population-based cohort study was performed in Navarre, Spain, where nirsevimab was offered at birth to all children born from October to December 2023. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio of hospitalisation for PCR-confirmed RSV infection between infants who received and did not receive nirsevimab. Of 1177 infants studied, 1083 (92.0%) received nirsevimab. The risk of hospitalisation for RSV was 8.5% (8/94) among non-immunised infants versus 0.7% (8/1083) in those that were immunised. The estimated effectiveness of nirsevimab was 88.7% (95% confidence interval, 69.6–95.8). Immunisation at birth of infants born between October and December 2023 prevented one hospitalisation for every 15.3 immunised infants. Immunisation of children born from September to January might prevent 77.5% of preventable hospitalisations for RSV in infants born in 2023–2024. These results support the recommendation of nirsevimab immunisation at birth to children born during the RSV epidemic or in the months immediately before to prevent severe RSV infections and alleviate the overload of paediatric hospital resources.

15 November 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NVNatividad Viguria
Natividad Viguria
IMIván Martínez-Baz
Iván Martínez-Baz
LMLAURA MORENO-GALARRAGA
LAURA MORENO-GALARRAGA
LSLuis Sierrasesúmaga
Luis Sierrasesúmaga
BSBlanca Salcedo
Blanca Salcedo
JCJesús Castilla
Jesús Castilla
Understanding respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) morbidity may help to plan health care and future vaccine recommendations. We aim to describe the characteristics and temporal distribution of children diagnosed with RSV admitted in a Spanish hospital. Descriptive study for which the hospital discharges of children < 5 years of age with RSV infection were analyzed. The information was extracted from the hospital discharge database of a reference pediatric hospital in northern Spain for the 2010–2011 to 2014–2015 RSV seasons. Six hundred and forty-seven hospitalizations of children with RSV infection were analyzed, 94% of which occurred between the second week of November and the last week of March. Most children (72%) were under one year of age and 95% were previously healthy infants. Infants born from October to December had the highest risk of hospitalization in the first year of life. The median length of hospital stay of children with and without comorbidities was six and three days, respectively. 6.5% of the hospitalized cases were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit; this percentage was higher among children < 2 months (adjusted odds ratio 4.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.37–12.61) or with comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio 4.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.53–11.28). The case lethality was 0.3%. The risk of hospitalizations for RSV is high during the first year of life and increases among infants born in the fall. Being under two months of age and presenting comorbidities are the main risk factors associated to pediatric intensive care unit admission.

27 January 2021 in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NVNatividad Viguria
Natividad Viguria
ANAna Navascués
Ana Navascués
RJRegina Juanbeltz
Regina Juanbeltz
AEAlberto Echeverría
Alberto Echeverría
CECarmen Ezpeleta
Carmen Ezpeleta
JCJesús Castilla
Jesús Castilla
To date, there is no consensus regarding palivizumab prophylaxis for respiratory syncytial virus infection. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of palivizumab prophylaxis to prevent respiratory syncytial virus-related infection consultations and hospitalizations in high-risk children <2 y. We studied children <2 y of age with risk factors who had indication of palivizumab prophylaxis over eight epidemic seasons (2011–2012 to 2018–2019) in Navarra, Spain. Children positives for respiratory syncytial virus by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction were compared to negative testers. Palivizumab was indicated in 1,214 children <2 y of age with risk factors during 2011–2012 to 2018–2019 seasons. A total of 142 high-risk children tested for respiratory syncytial virus were included in the study. From the 35 respiratory syncytial virus-positive confirmed cases, 20 (57%) had received palivizumab versus 82 (77%) from the 107 negative controls. The effectiveness of prophylactic palivizumab was 70% (95% CI, 19%-90%) in preventing confirmed clinical infection and 82% (95% CI, 29%-96%) in preventing hospitalized cases. Our results show that palivizumab is notably effective for preventing laboratory-confirmed cases of respiratory syncytial virus and hospitalization in high-risk children <2 y of age. For children who have received palivizumab, the risk of getting sick remains high; thus, other preventive measures are necessary.

15 July 2023 in European Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBeatriz Ramos La Cuey
Beatriz Ramos La Cuey
NSNeus Saloni-Gomez
Neus Saloni-Gomez
AMAndrea Ilundain López de Munain
Andrea Ilundain López de Munain
AFAlejandro Fernandez-Montero
Alejandro Fernandez-Montero
NVNatividad Viguria
Natividad Viguria
LMLAURA MORENO-GALARRAGA
LAURA MORENO-GALARRAGA

1 January 2021 in European Journal of Radiology Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAndrea Ilundain López de Munain
Andrea Ilundain López de Munain
CVCristina Jimenez Veintemilla
Cristina Jimenez Veintemilla
MAMercedes Herranz Aguirre
Mercedes Herranz Aguirre
NVNatividad Viguria
Natividad Viguria
BRBeatriz Ramos-Lacuey
Beatriz Ramos-Lacuey
LMLAURA MORENO-GALARRAGA
LAURA MORENO-GALARRAGA
Many articles have been published regarding chest-imaging in COVID-19, but fewer studies have been published in pediatric populations. COVID-19 symptoms in children are generally milder and radiological tests have fewer positive findings. Indications for chest imaging in pediatric COVID-19 patients remain unclear. This study aims to describe the chest radiographs performed in COVID-19 patients in a pediatric hospital, to review the current chest X-ray indications and to develop an specific age-adjusted protocol for chest-imaging in children with COVID-19. Retrospective study in hospitalized pediatric COVID-19 patients in Navarre, Spain. Between March and December 2020, 44 children were included (mean age 3.8-year-old, 50 % males). Demographic information, cause of admission, symptoms, and clinical evolution were described. Chest imaging technique performed, indications and findings were analyzed. A literature review was performed searching for current COVID-19 pediatric chest-imaging indications. Chest X-rays were performed in 35 patients (80 % of admissions) and most common indications were fever and respiratory symptoms. 53 % of the chest X-rays were considered “normal” and the classical bilateral diffuse interstitial pattern, described in adults, was only present in 22 %. All patients with pathological chest X-rays were symptomatic and reported fever (100 %) and fever tended to be longer (fever duration: 4.25 vs. 2.46 days p:0.048) in patients with pathological radiographs. We present a specific protocol for chest-imaging in pediatric COVID-19 cases. COVID-19 clinical manifestations and radiological findings are milder and less specific in children. Imaging should not be used as a screening tool or a routine complementary test in pediatric COVID-19 patients, not even in hospitalized cases.

27 January 2025 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRClaudia María Chaverri Repáraz
Claudia María Chaverri Repáraz
EFEsther Lacalle Fabo
Esther Lacalle Fabo
MFMaria Erroz Ferrer
Maria Erroz Ferrer
MGMaría Gimeno-Castillo
María Gimeno-Castillo
ICIsabel Castro-Garrido
Isabel Castro-Garrido
LMLAURA MORENO-GALARRAGA
LAURA MORENO-GALARRAGA
Introduction: Biologic therapies have revolutionized the management of severe asthma in pediatrics, offering targeted options for specific inflammatory pathways. This study aimed to review the current indications and availability of biologics approved for pediatric use as of January 2025 and to analyze the clinical experience of a tertiary center in managing this condition. Methods: A comprehensive review of the biologics available for treating severe asthma in children was conducted, highlighting their indications and key characteristics. Additionally, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the experience of the Pediatric Severe Asthma Unit at the University Hospital of Navarra in utilizing these therapies between 2015 and 2025, with a focus on treatment distribution and reasons for switching biologics. Results: As of January 2025, the biologics available for pediatric use include omalizumab, mepolizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, and benralizumab, each with specific indications and different administration profiles. At the analyzed center, the distribution of biologics was as follows: omalizumab (27%), mepolizumab (27%), dupilumab (37%), and tezepelumab (9%). At the same center, the biologic distribution 10 years earlier was 100% omalizumab. Therapy changes and switches were primarily related to clinical response, posology, and comorbidities. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of individualized management in pediatric severe asthma, based on continuous evaluation and appropriate biologic selection according to the clinical characteristics of each patient. It also highlights the need to develop specific guidelines for adjusting, switching, and discontinuing these therapies.