Eric Ferrage

Dr. Eric Ferrage

Institut de Chimie et Matériaux de Poitiers, UMR 7285, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, F-86073 Poitiers, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2005 in American Mineralogist: Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eric FerrageEric Ferrage
Eric Ferrage
BLBruno Lanson
Bruno Lanson
BSBoris A. Sakharov
Boris A. Sakharov
VDVictor A. Drits
Victor A. Drits
Hydration of the <1 μm size fraction of SWy-1 source clay (low-charge montmorillonite) was studied by modeling of X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns recorded under controlled relative humidity (RH) conditions on Li-, Na-, K-, Mg-, Ca-, and Sr-saturated specimens. The quantitative description of smectite hydration, based on the relative proportions of different layer types derived from the fitting of experimental XRD patterns, was consistent with previous reports of smectite hydration. However, the coexistence of smectite layer types exhibiting contrasting hydration states was systematically observed, and heterogeneity rather than homogeneity seems to be the rule for smectite hydration. This heterogeneity can be characterized qualitatively using the standard deviation of the departure from rationality of the 00l reflection series (ξ), which is systematically larger than 0.4 Å when the prevailing layer type accounts for ~70% or less of the total layers (~25% of XRD patterns examined). In addition, hydration heterogeneities are not distributed randomly within smectite crystallites, and models describing these complex structures involve two distinct contributions, each containing different layer types that are interstratifed randomly. As a result, the different layer types are partially segregated in the sample. However, these two contributions do not imply the actual presence of two populations of particles in the sample. XRD profile modeling also has allowed the refinement of structural parameters, such as the location of interlayer species and the layer thickness corresponding to the different layer types, for all interlayer cations and RH values. From the observed dependence of the latter parameter on the cation ionic potential (v/r; v = cation valency and r = ionic radius) and on RH, the following equations were derived: which allow the quantification of the increase of layer thickness with increasing RH for both 1W (one water) and 2W (two water) layers. In addition, for 2W layers, interlayer H2O molecules are probably distributed as a unique plane on each side of the central interlayer cation. This plane of H2O molecules is located at ~1.20 Å from the central interlayer cation along the c* axis.

19 February 2010 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Eric FerrageEric Ferrage
Eric Ferrage
BLBruno Lanson
Bruno Lanson
LMLaurent J. Michot
Laurent J. Michot
JRJean-Louis Robert
Jean-Louis Robert

1 October 2007 in American Mineralogist: Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eric FerrageEric Ferrage
Eric Ferrage
BLBruno Lanson
Bruno Lanson
BSBoris A. Sakharov
Boris A. Sakharov
NGNicolas Geoffroy
Nicolas Geoffroy
EJEmmanuel Jacquot
Emmanuel Jacquot
VDVictor A. Drits
Victor A. Drits
Hydration of the <1 μm size fraction of a high-charge montmorillonite (Clay Minerals Society Source Clay SAz-1), and of low- and high-charge beidellites (Source Clays SbId-1 and SbCa-1, respectively) was studied by modeling of X-ray diffraction patterns recorded under controlled relative humidity (RH) for Sr- and/or Ca-saturated specimens. The influence of layer charge and charge location on smectite hydration was studied. Distribution of layers with different hydration states (dehydrated–0W, monohydrated–1W, bihydrated–2W, or tri-hydrated–3W) within smectite crystals often leads to two distinct contributions to the X-ray diffraction pattern, each contribution having different layer types randomly interstratified. Structure models are more heterogeneous for beidellite than for montmorillonite. For beidellite, two distinct populations of particles with different coherent scattering domain sizes account for the heterogeneity. Increased hydration heterogeneity in beidellite originates also from the presence of 0W (non-expandable) and of 1W layers under high relative humidity (RH) conditions. Similarly, after ethylene-glycol (EG) solvation, some beidellite layers incorporate only one plane of EG molecules whereas homogeneous swelling was observed for montmorillonite with the systematic presence of two planes of EG molecules. For montmorillonite and beidellite, the increase of layer charge shifts the 2W-to-1W and the 1W-to-0W transitions toward lower RH values. For all samples, layer thickness of 0, 1, and 2W layer types was similar to that determined for low-charge SWy-1 montmorillonite (Source Clay SWy-1), and no change of layer thickness was observed as a function of the amount or of the location of layer charge. However, layer thickness increased with increasing RH conditions.

10 January 2011 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Eric FerrageEric Ferrage
Eric Ferrage
BSBoris A. Sakharov
Boris A. Sakharov
LMLaurent J. Michot
Laurent J. Michot
ADAlfred Delville
Alfred Delville
ABAllan Bauer
Allan Bauer
GCGabriel J CUELLO
Gabriel J CUELLO

1 June 2005 in Chemistry of Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Eric FerrageEric Ferrage
Eric Ferrage
BLBruno Lanson
Bruno Lanson
NMNatalie Malikova
Natalie Malikova
APAlain Plançon
Alain Plançon
BSBoris A. Sakharov
Boris A. Sakharov
VDVictor A. Drits
Victor A. Drits

1 May 2004 in Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTChristophe Tournassat
Christophe Tournassat
Eric FerrageEric Ferrage
Eric Ferrage
CPChristiane Poinsignon
Christiane Poinsignon
LCLaurent Charlet
Laurent Charlet