In the knowledge economy, innovation is playing an increasingly important role in urban sustainable development. Thus, how to strengthen the construction of innovation spaces has become a significant issue. Based on data from high-tech enterprises in the central urban area of Harbin, this study analyzes the distribution, agglomeration characteristics, and influencing factors of urban innovation spaces. The influencing factor index system was constructed based on four aspects: innovation support, service facilities, the social environment, and the natural environment. After analyzing these influencing factors through comparing the results obtained with an ordinary least squares (OLS) model and a geographical weighted regression (GWR) model, the GWR model was determined to have a better fitting effect and was thus used for further analysis. The findings are as follows: (1) Five closely related clusters of innovation spaces are identified. Innovation space has a significant agglomerating distribution pattern. (2) Overall, factors supporting innovation and transportation station factors have a positive effect on the agglomeration of innovation spaces, while natural environment factors have a negative effect on small innovation areas. (3) By region, the aggregation of innovation spaces in downtown areas is slightly negatively affected by service facilities, whereas those in the Harbin New District are mainly supported by policies and those in the Pingfang District are positively affected by the quantity of the labor force. Finally, based on the research results, some suggestions are put forward to promote the development of urban innovation spaces. This paper has certain guiding significance for optimizing and improving the construction and development of urban innovation spaces.

Rural areas face increasing threats from water-related disasters yet often lack the infrastructure and resources available in urban areas for effective disaster response and recovery. Understanding and improving rural resilience—the ability to withstand and recover from disasters—is critical for sustainable rural development, especially under pressures from the climate. This study introduces a practical, indicator-based framework to evaluate rural resilience by analyzing five key aspects: stability, hazards, exposure, vulnerability, and adaptability. Using Zhejiang Province in China as a case study, we examined changes in rural resilience from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal that regions with a strong economic foundation, diversified livelihoods, and well-developed healthcare and education infrastructure exhibit higher resilience, while those with high exposure to hazards and economic dependency on agriculture remain vulnerable. The study highlights the crucial role of adaptive capacity in driving long-term resilience, emphasizing targeted investments in rural healthcare, education, infrastructure, and economic diversification. By providing data-driven insights, this research contributes to SDG 11 by offering practical strategies for policymakers and local communities to enhance disaster preparedness and rural sustainability. Moreover, the framework developed here can be adapted and applied to other rural regions facing similar hazards globally, enhancing disaster preparedness and promoting sustainable rural development.

Artificial ecological corridors (AECs) are internationally approved ecological restoration and climate mitigation strategies. The width and recovery time indices of AECs directly affect the restoration efficiency of degraded soil nutrients. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and quantitative evaluation research on the construction factors of AECs from the perspective of soil fertility improvement. This research aimed to examine the critical ecological corridor construction factors affecting Mollisols’ eco-chemometrics and give a scientific scope. We collected 55 Mollisol samples at different restoration years (0–35 years) and different distances (0–280 m) from the AEC of the Ashi River, a typical Mollisol restoration area in Harbin, and the cold regions of China. We measured the distances, restoration years, soil thickness, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil total organic carbon (SOC), soil total organic matter (SOM), dry matter content (DMC), and the proportion of nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (TP) and potassium (TK). The results are as follows: (1) Within the AEC, there were significant differences in soil stoichiometric characteristics in different restoration years and locations; after restoration for 10–35 years, the soil stoichiometric characteristics reach or exceed the reference value of Mollisols. (2) It is feasible to restore large-scale degraded Mollisols through ecological corridors. In this recovery process, the soil nutrients first decreased, then increased, and finally reached and exceeded the reference value of normal Mollisols. (3) Soil nutrient accumulation was related to ecological corridor width and recovery time. The recommended unilateral width of the ecological corridor based on Mollisols’ CEC and SOC indices for restoration is 175–225 m, and the restoration period is 22.7–35 years based on Mollisols’ EC and SOC indices for restoration. This study demonstrated the change mechanism of Mollisols in AECs based on recovery time and location, and provided the basis for the Chinese government to formulate policies for Mollisol remediation.

SCIEPublish is an international open-access journal publishing service provider run by SCIE Publishing Limited, dedicated to supporting and inspiring scientists or institutions/societies who aspire to publish high-quality journals.

Against the backdrop of accelerating globalization and the reconfiguration of ecological security patterns, border regions—serving as critical carriers of national spatial governance—exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity and stage-dependent characteristics in land use evolution that warrant systematic investigation. This study focuses on global border zones to reveal the trends and evolutionary pathways of land use change, thereby providing a scientific basis for border spatial governance. Using the period of 1992–2020, four phases of global land cover data from the European Space Agency (ESA) were employed. Buffer zones of 50 km, 100 km, and 150 km were established along global national boundaries, and the study period was divided into three decadal stages. Border types were classified into terrestrial borders, coastal borders, and island borders. An integrated indicator system was constructed, including the Single Land Use Dynamic Degree (SLUDD), Integrated Land Use Dynamic Degree (ILUDD), and Weighted Composite Transition Intensity. A multi-scale nested analytical framework coupled with transition matrices was applied to assess land use evolution across global, continental, and bilateral national scales. The results indicate the following: (1) Distinct evolutionary pathways exist among border types. Terrestrial borders exhibit a combination of development and ecological restoration, with staged peaks in urban expansion; coastal borders are dominated by a unidirectional conversion from cropland to built-up land; and island borders demonstrate concurrent agricultural decline, ecological recovery, and built-up expansion. (2) From 1992 to 2020, global border land use underwent a transition from high-intensity transformations to low-intensity steady adjustments. Major changes were centered on the expansion of production space, outward diffusion of built-up areas, and vegetation restructuring. High-intensity changes were concentrated near boundary zones and attenuated significantly with increasing buffer distance. (3) At the continental scale, stable hierarchical patterns emerge in terms of change intensity, spatial gradients, and transition structures. Borders in Eurasia and North America show higher activity, Africa exhibits widespread diffusion, and South America and Oceania are characterized by forest boundary reshaping and vegetation adjustments, respectively. (4) Typical border regions can be categorized into three evolutionary types: forest ecological frontiers, agricultural expansion zones, and land–sea composite corridors. Regional trajectories vary significantly, with Southeast Asia transitioning rapidly toward stabilization, West Africa retaining periodic high-intensity disturbances, and South America remaining in a low-intensity adjustment state. This study clarifies the evolutionary patterns and boundary effect ranges of global border land use, providing theoretical support and empirical references for resource allocation and ecological regulation in border regions. It also lays the groundwork for refining border typologies, quantifying driving mechanisms, and developing differentiated cross-border governance strategies.

In the era of urban stock development, the regeneration of historic districts must abandon the misguided approach of large-scale, sweeping transformations and shift toward a micro-regeneration model characterized by small-scale, precise, and incremental interventions. However, as urban renewal enters this stock-based phase, the issues of “physical dissonance” and “cultural discontinuity” in the heritage landscapes of historic districts are becoming increasingly pronounced. To solve this problem, this paper aims to identify the heritage landscape genes of historical districts, explore the characteristics of historical districts, provide operational targets for the micro-renewal of historical districts, guide the implementation of micro-regeneration policies of historical districts, and then improve the quality of historical district heritage landscapes. Taking the Chinese Baroque Block in Harbin as an example, this paper proposes a genetic recognition method for the heritage landscape of historical districts based on the spatial translation of historical information, spatial topology analysis, an improved U-Net deep learning model, and text mining theme analysis. The micro-regeneration path of historical blocks of “gene identification-feature mining-targeted operation-quality improvement” is proposed. The micro-regeneration countermeasures of “gene replacement and texture repair in open space, gene repair and targeted acupuncture in street and alley, gene embedding and catalyst adjustment in courtyard layout, gene recombination and embroidery treatment of architectural style, and retrospective and contextual narrative of intangible genes” are formulated. The heritage landscape gene of historical districts is conducive to the refined control of the characteristics and quality of historical districts and provides new ideas for the micro-regeneration of historical districts in the stock era.