The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) can be challenging in clinical practice because MS presentation can be atypical and mimicked by other diseases. We evaluated the diagnostic performance, alone or in combination, of the central vein sign (CVS), paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL), and cortical lesion (CL), as well as their association with clinical outcomes. In this multicenter observational study, we first conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the CVS (proportion of CVS-positive lesions or simplified determination of CVS in 3/6 lesions-Select3*/Select6*), PRL, and CL in MS and non-MS cases on 3T-MRI brain images, including 3D T2-FLAIR, T2*-echo-planar imaging magnitude and phase, double inversion recovery, and magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo image sequences. Then, we longitudinally analyzed the progression independent of relapse and MRI activity (PIRA) in MS cases over the 2 years after study entry. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to test diagnostic performance and regression models to predict diagnosis and clinical outcomes. The presence of ≥41% CVS-positive lesions/≥1 CL/≥1 PRL (optimal cutoffs) had 96%/90%/93% specificity, 97%/84%/60% sensitivity, and 0.99/0.90/0.77 area under the curve (AUC), respectively, to distinguish MS (n = 185) from non-MS (n = 100) cases. The Select3*/Select6* algorithms showed 93%/95% specificity, 97%/89% sensitivity, and 0.95/0.92 AUC. The combination of CVS, CL, and PRL improved the diagnostic performance, especially when Select3*/Select6* were used (93%/94% specificity, 98%/96% sensitivity, 0.99/0.98 AUC; p = 0.002/p < 0.001). In MS cases (n = 185), both CL and PRL were associated with higher MS disability and severity. Longitudinal analysis (n = 61) showed that MS cases with >4 PRL at baseline were more likely to experience PIRA at 2-year follow-up (odds ratio 17.0, 95% confidence interval: 2.1-138.5; p = 0.008), whereas no association was observed between other baseline MRI measures and PIRA, including the number of CL. The combination of CVS, CL, and PRL can improve MS differential diagnosis. CL and PRL also correlated with clinical measures of poor prognosis, with PRL being a predictor of disability accrual independent of clinical/MRI activity.

Reports of neurological involvement during Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection course are increasingly described. The aim of this review is to provide a clinical approach of SARS-CoV-2 neurological complications based on the direct or indirect (systemic/immune-mediated) role of the SARS-CoV-2 in their genesis. A review of the current literature has been carried out up to May 20th 2020 according to the PRISMA guidelines. All case series and reports of adult neurological manifestations associated to SARS-CoV-2 published in English were considered. Review and fundamental research studies on Coronaviruses neuroinvasive potential were analyzed to support pathogenic hypothesis and possible underlying mechanisms. Clinical patterns were subdivided into three groups according to putative underlying mechanisms: direct invasion of central or peripheral nervous system, systemic disorders leading to acute CNS injuries and post-infectious neurological syndromes (PINS). Sixteen case series and 26 case reports for a total of 903 patients were identified presenting with neurological involvement during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hypo/anosmia and dys/ageusia were found in 826 patients and mainly attributed to direct viral invasion. Cerebrovascular complications occurred in 51 patients and related to viral infection associated systemic inflammation. PINS were described in only 26 patients. A wide heterogeneity of these reports emerged concerning the extension of the clinical examination and ancillary exams performed. Neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 are mainly related to olfactory and gustatory sensory perception disorders through possible direct nervous system invasion while cerebrovascular disease and PINS are rare and due to distinct and indirect pathophysiological mechanisms.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology is characterized by acute and chronic inflammation, demyelination, axonal injury, and neurodegeneration. After decades of research into MS-related degeneration, recent efforts have shifted toward recovery and the prevention of further damage. A key area of focus is the remyelination process, where researchers are studying the effects of pharmacotherapy on myelin repair mechanisms. Multiple compounds are being tested for their potential to foster remyelination in different clinical settings through the application of less or more complex techniques to assess their efficacy. Objective: To review current methods and biomarkers to track myelin regeneration and recovery over time in people with MS (PwMS), with potential implications for promyelinating drug testing. Methods: Narrative review, based on a selection of PubMed articles discussing techniques to measure in vivo myelin repair and functional recovery in PwMS. Results: Non-invasive tools, such as structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET), are being implemented to track myelin repair, while other techniques like evoked potentials, functional MRI, and digital markers allow the assessment of functional recovery. These methods, alone or in combination, have been employed to obtain precise biomarkers of remyelination and recovery in various clinical trials on MS. Conclusions: Combining different techniques to identify myelin restoration in MS could yield novel biomarkers, enhancing the accuracy of clinical trial outcomes for remyelinating therapies in PwMS.

Background: Growing evidence links brain-MRI enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) and multiple sclerosis (MS), but their role remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the cross-sectional associations of EPVS with several neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative features in a large multicentric-MS cohort. Methods: In total, 207 patients underwent 3T axial-T2-weighted brain-MRI for EPVS assessment (EPVS dichotomized into high/low according to ⩾ 2/< 2 rating categories). MRI biomarkers included brain-predicted age and brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD), central vein sign (CVS)-positive lesion percentage (CVS%), paramagnetic rim and cortical lesions, T2-lesion load, and brain volumetry. The variable relative importance for EPVS-category prediction was explored using a classification random forest approach. Results: High EPVS patients were older (49 vs 44 years, p = 0.003), had ⩾ 1 vascular risk factors (VRFs; p = 0.005), lower CVS% (67% vs 78%, p < 0.001), reduced brain volumes (whole brain: 0.63 vs 0.73, p = 0.01; gray matter: 0.36 vs 0.40; p = 0.002), and older brain-predicted age (58 vs 50 years, p < 0.001). No differences were found for neuroinflammatory markers. After adjusting for age and VFRs (multivariate analyses), the high EPVS category correlated with lower CVS% (odds ratio (OR) = 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96–0.99; p = 0.02), lower whole brain (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.0003–0.5; p = 0.02), gray matter (OR = 0.0004, 95% CI = 0.0000004–0.4; p = 0.03) volumes, and higher brain-PAD (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01–1.09; p = 0.02). Random forest identified brain-PAD as the most important predictor of high EPVS. Conclusion: EPVS in MS likely reflect microangiopathic disease rather than neuroinflammation, potentially contributing to accelerated neurodegeneration.