Xiaohan Wang

Mr. Xiaohan Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 June 2025 in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLLi'e Liang
Li'e Liang
YCYan Chao
Yan Chao
XWXiaohan Wang
Xiaohan Wang
JLJiamin Li
Jiamin Li
PMPengfei Ma
Pengfei Ma

3 June 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLi'e Liang
Li'e Liang
留胡留龙 胡
留龙 胡
XWXiaohan Wang
Xiaohan Wang
YZYonghua Zhu
Yonghua Zhu
ZLZiyi Liu
Ziyi Liu
RYRui Yang
Rui Yang
Climate change remains among the most pressing environmental challenges confronting the world, exerting profound pressure on both ecological systems and socio-economic development. To advance understanding of the evolution patterns and driving mechanisms governing hydroclimatic systems in arid and semi-arid regions, this study employed an integrated framework encompassing trend testing, change-point detection, periodicity and persistence analysis, and machine learning-based attribution. Focusing on the Mu Us Sandy Land from 1982 to 2023, we systematically investigated the spatiotemporal evolution, periodic characteristics, and driving mechanisms of hydroclimatic factors. Furthermore, future climate risks were assessed using CMIP6 multi-model data. The results showed that: (1) All four variables exhibited positive slopes, but only soil moisture showed a statistically significant long-term wetting trend (β = 0.025 × 10−3, p = 0.0008) and a clear global abrupt change in 2011; the upward tendencies of precipitation (p = 0.3946), potential evapotranspiration (p = 0.4970), and surface runoff (p = 0.1097) did not reach the 0.05 significance level. (2) Meteorological elements showed weak periodicity and strong anti-persistence (mean Hurst index = 0.379 for precipitation and 0.222 for PET), whereas hydrological elements exhibited clear seasonal–interannual periods and more random future variability with greater spatial heterogeneity (mean Hurst index = 0.436 for runoff and 0.414 for soil moisture). (3) Monthly changes were mainly associated with local surface processes. Vegetation dynamics were key predictors of precipitation, runoff, and soil moisture, while potential evapotranspiration was dominated by atmospheric demand, with limited influence from large-scale climate indices. (4) Under high-emission scenarios, imbalanced water–heat increases may lead to a higher likelihood of drought conditions.

23 June 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLi'e Liang
Li'e Liang
留胡留龙 胡
留龙 胡
XWXiaohan Wang
Xiaohan Wang
YZYonghua Zhu
Yonghua Zhu
YCYan Chao
Yan Chao
ZLZiyi Liu
Ziyi Liu
Taking the Yellow River Basin (YRB) as an example, this study explores the non-stationary drought evolution features in large river basins under climate change. This study utilized precipitation and multiple climate factor data to establish the non-stationary standardized precipitation index (NSPI) through the GAMLSS model. Combined with the run theory, Copula function and a cascaded RF-LSTM machine learning model, the drought characteristics and retrospective predictive patterns were systematically assessed. The results show that: (1) The Arctic Oscillation, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, the Southern Oscillation and the North Pacific Index are the primary climate drivers of non-stationary precipitation variation in the YRB, with the former three being selected most frequently and NPI additionally influencing April–June and September, and their effects are both different and lagging. Compared with the traditional SPI, the NSPI assigned higher drought grades and greater severity to typical drought years (e.g., the 1974 event was rated D3 with a severity of 17.935 by NSPI versus D2 with 11.733 by SPI), and thus better captured non-stationary drought evolution. (2) The duration of droughts exhibited a decreasing trend that was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), whereas drought intensity and severity decreased significantly (p < 0.05); the peak severity showed a significant upward trend (p = 0.0078). Spatially, the northwest of the Loess Plateau was a compound core area with high severity, high frequency and long duration of droughts, while the upper reaches were mainly characterized by low severity, short duration and sudden droughts. (3) The drought risk in the YRB shows a higher frequency in the lower reaches and a lower frequency in the upper reaches. The middle and lower reaches were high-risk areas, with shorter AND-type joint exceedance return periods for moderate drought (2.46–5.83 years) and severe drought (3.77–9.15 years). The upper reaches were low-risk areas, with longer return periods reaching up to 5.83 years for moderate drought and 9.15 years for severe drought. The study shows that the NSPI, considering the driving of multiple climate factors, can more effectively identify and assess non-stationary drought risks, providing a scientific basis for drought prevention and control in river basins.