Background Patients' experience with health care is becoming a key component for the provision of a patient-centered health care model. The aim of this study was to assess the experience with health care of patients with inflammatory arthritis and patient- and health care–related factors. Methods Patients responded to an anonymous survey provided by their treating clinical teams. The survey comprised the validated 12-item IEXPAC (Instrument to Evaluate the EXperience of PAtients with Chronic diseases) tool and demographic variables and health care–related characteristics that may affect patients' experience. Results A total of 359 of 625 surveys were returned (response rate, 57.4%). Overall, patient responses were positive (>60% gave “always/mostly” answers) for statements assessing the interaction between patients and health care professionals or patient self-management following health care professional guidance. However, positive patient responses for items regarding patient interaction with the health care system via the internet or with other patients were less than 13%. Only 25.6% of patients who had been hospitalized reported receiving a follow-up call or visit following discharge. In the bivariate analysis, experience scores were higher (better experience) in men, those seen by fewer specialists or by the same physician, and in patients treated with a fewer number of drugs or with subcutaneous/intravenous drugs. Multivariate analyses identified regular follow-up by the same physician and treatment with subcutaneous/intravenous drugs as variables associated with a better patient experience. Conclusions This study identifies areas of care for patients with inflammatory arthritis with the potential to improve patients' experience and highlights the importance of patient-physician relationships and comprehensive patient care.

Upadacitinib has demonstrated efficacy in psoriatic arthritis in clinical trials, but its real-world performance in difficult-to-treat PsA remains underexplored. This observational, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in 134 patients with psoriatic arthritis (97 women, mean age 51.8 ± 11.2 years, mean disease duration 9.94 ± 7.72 years) who showed inadequate response to advanced therapies. Most patients (74.6%) had received at least two biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs with different mechanisms of action. Upadacitinib was initiated at 15 mg daily, and within one month, significant improvements were observed: DAS28-ESR decreased from 4.7 to 3.77 (p < 0.001), DAPSA from 25 to 17 (p < 0.001), and CRP from 2.90 to 1.50 mg/L (p = 0.001). These reductions persisted throughout the study. Prednisone dosage decreased significantly (p = 0.049). Adverse events led to upadacitinib discontinuation in 8.2% of patients, but no serious adverse events were reported. Compared to the SELECT-PsA 2 trial, our cohort had a higher proportion of females and greater prior exposure to biologic agents but showed comparable efficacy and safety outcomes. These findings suggest that upadacitinib is a rapid, effective, and relatively safe therapeutic option for difficult-to-treat psoriatic arthritis under real-world conditions, supporting its use despite differing patient characteristics from clinical trial populations.