Derived by endosymbiosis from ancestral cyanobacteria, chloroplasts integrated seamlessly into the biology of their host cell. That integration involved a massive transfer of genes to the cell's nucleus, with the modification of pre-existing processes, like plastid division and the operation of the plastid genetic machinery and the emergence of new ones, like the import of proteins translated in the cytoplasm. The uncovering in molecular detail of several of these processes reveals a merger of mechanisms of symbiont and host origin. Chloroplasts acquired roles as part of the biology of land plants by differentiating into a variety of interconvertible plastid forms according to the cell type. How these conversions take place, or how new problems, like the regulation of the plastid population size in cells, have been solved, is barely starting to be understood. Like the whole plant and as a result of the requirements and dangers associated with photosynthetic activity, chloroplasts in particular are under the control of environmental cues. Far from being passive targets of cellular processes, plastids are sources of signals of plastid-nuclear communication, which regulate activities for their own biogenesis. Plastids are also sources of developmental signals, in whose absence tissue architecture or cell differentiation are aberrant, in a cell-autonomous fashion. Over evolutionary time, plastids also contributed many genes for activities that are no longer directly associated with them (like light perception or hormone function). The overall picture is one in which plastids are at both the receiving and the acting ends in plant development, in both ontogenic and evolutionary terms.

Summary: Chloroplasts are best known for their role in photosynthesis, but they also allow nitrogen and sulphur assimilation, amino acid, fatty acid, nucleotide and hormone synthesis. How chloroplasts develop is therefore relevant to these diverse and fundamental biological processes, but also to attempts at their rational redesign. Light is strictly required for chloroplast formation in all angiosperms and directly regulates the expression of hundreds of chloroplast‐related genes. Light also modulates the levels of several hormones including brassinosteriods, cytokinins, auxins and gibberellins, which themselves control chloroplast development particularly during early stages of plant development. Transcription factors such as GOLDENLIKE1&2 (GLK1&2), GATA NITRATE‐INDUCIBLE CARBON METABOLISM‐INVOLVED (GNC) and CYTOKININ‐RESPONSIVE GATA FACTOR 1 (CGA1) act downstream of both light and phytohormone signalling to regulate chloroplast development. Thus, in green tissues transcription factors, light signalling and hormone signalling form a complex network regulating the transcription of chloroplast‐ and photosynthesis‐related genes to control the development and number of chloroplasts per cell. We use this conceptual framework to identify points of regulation that could be harnessed to modulate chloroplast abundance and increase photosynthetic efficiency of crops, and to highlight future avenues to overcome gaps in current knowledge.

Fruit-specific downregulation of the DE-ETIOLATED1 (DET1) gene product results in tomato fruits (Solanum lycopersicum) containing enhanced nutritional antioxidants, with no detrimental effects on yield. In an attempt to further our understanding of how modulation of this gene leads to improved quality traits, detailed targeted and multilevel omic characterization has been performed. Metabolite profiling revealed quantitative increases in carotenoid, tocopherol, phenylpropanoids, flavonoids, and anthocyanidins. Qualitative differences could also be identified within the phenolics, including unique formation in fruit pericarp tissues. These changes resulted in increased total antioxidant content both in the polar and nonpolar fractions. Increased transcription of key biosynthetic genes is a likely mechanism producing elevated phenolic-based metabolites. By contrast, high levels of isoprenoids do not appear to result from transcriptional regulation but are more likely related to plastid-based parameters, such as increased plastid volume per cell. Parallel metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the widespread effects of DET1 downregulation on diverse sectors of metabolism and sites of synthesis. Correlation analysis of transcripts and metabolites independently indicated strong coresponses within and between related pathways/processes. Interestingly, despite the fact that secondary metabolites were the most severely affected in ripe tomato fruit, our integrative analyses suggest that the coordinated activation of core metabolic processes in cell types amenable to plastid biogenesis is the main effect of DET1 loss of function.

It has been proposed that plants are capable of producing methane by a novel and unidentified biochemical pathway. Emission of methane with an apparently biological origin was recorded from both whole plants and detached leaves. This was the first report of methanogenesis in an aerobic setting, and was estimated to account for 10–45 per cent of the global methane source. Here, we show that plants do not contain a known biochemical pathway to synthesize methane. However, under high UV stress conditions, there may be spontaneous breakdown of plant material, which releases methane. In addition, plants take up and transpire water containing dissolved methane, leading to the observation that methane is released. Together with a new analysis of global methane levels from satellite retrievals, we conclude that plants are not a major source of the global methane production.