The epidemiological evidence for a dose-response relationship between magnesium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is sparse. The aim of the study was to summarize the evidence for the association of dietary magnesium intake with risk of T2D and evaluate the dose-response relationship. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies that reported dietary magnesium intake and risk of incident T2D. We identified relevant studies by searching major scientific literature databases and grey literature resources from their inception to February 2016. We included cohort studies that provided risk ratios, i.e., relative risks (RRs), odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs), for T2D. Linear dose-response relationships were assessed using random-effects meta-regression. Potential nonlinear associations were evaluated using restricted cubic splines. A total of 25 studies met the eligibility criteria. These studies comprised 637,922 individuals including 26,828 with a T2D diagnosis. Compared with the lowest magnesium consumption group in the population, the risk of T2D was reduced by 17% across all the studies; 19% in women and 16% in men. A statistically significant linear dose-response relationship was found between incremental magnesium intake and T2D risk. After adjusting for age and body mass index, the risk of T2D incidence was reduced by 8%–13% for per 100 mg/day increment in dietary magnesium intake. There was no evidence to support a nonlinear dose-response relationship between dietary magnesium intake and T2D risk. The combined data supports a role for magnesium in reducing risk of T2D, with a statistically significant linear dose-response pattern within the reference dose range of dietary intake among Asian and US populations. The evidence from Europe and black people is limited and more prospective studies are needed for the two subgroups.

Background: Epidemiological evidence regarding the link between cancer and atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited and outcomes of metastatic cancer comorbid with AF need to be elucidated.Objective: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, temporal trends, and outcomes of AF in hospitalized metastatic cancer patients.Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify adult patients with metastatic tumors from 2003 to 2014. We analyzed the trends in AF prevalence, in‐hospital mortality, total cost, length of stay (LOS), and comorbidities pertaining to metastatic cancer. Multivariable‐adjusted models were used to evaluate the association of AF with clinical factors, in‐hospital mortality, total cost, and LOS.Results: Among 2,478,598 patients with metastatic cancer, 8.74% (216,737) were diagnosed with AF. The proportion of comorbid AF increased from 8.28% in 2003 to 10.06% in 2014 (p < 0.0001). Older age, white race, male, Medicare, higher income, larger hospital bed size, and urban teaching hospital were associated with higher AF occurrence. Among primary tumor sites, lung cancer experienced the highest odds of AF compared to other cancers. Patients with metastasis to lymph node and respiratory organ had higher odds of AF. In metastatic cancer, AF was associated with higher in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio: 1.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.43–1.54), 18% longer LOS, and 19% higher cost.Conclusions: AF prevalence in metastatic cancer continues to increase from 2003 to 2014. AF is linked to poorer prognosis and higher healthcare resource utilization. As the population ages, optimal preventive and treatment management strategies are needed for metastatic cancer comorbid with AF.

Background The benefits of continuing immunotherapy beyond disease progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remain uncertain, along with the specific patient subgroups that may gain the most from this approach. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy of this approach and identify target patient populations likely to benefit. Methods We collected data from patients with NSCLC and SCLC who experienced disease progression following initial immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment from January 2020 to December 2023. Patients were categorized based on second-line treatment: those receiving immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP) and those receiving non-immunotherapy beyond progression (NIBP). Survival outcomes and treatment safety were compared between these two groups. Results A total of 150 patients were included, with 111 NSCLC patients (IBP: n = 78, NIBP: n = 33) and 39 SCLC patients (IBP: n = 31, NIBP: n = 8). Significant differences in median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were found in patients with driver gene-negative NSCLC (mPFS: 4.7 vs 1.3 months, HR = 0.29, P < 0.01; mOS: 11.03 vs 2.63 months, HR = 0.13, P < 0.001) and SCLC (mPFS: 3.9 vs 2.1 months, HR = 0.38, P = 0.02; mOS: 9.28 vs 2.27 months, HR = 0.23, P < 0.01). Additionally, among driver gene-negative NSCLC patients, achieving a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) during initial immunotherapy was associated with improved effectiveness of continued immunotherapy beyond progression. Conclusions Continued immunotherapy as a second-line treatment may benefit patients with driver gene-negative NSCLC and SCLC who have progressed after initial immunotherapy.

Background: While developments in targeted therapy have marked a new epoch for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring actionable genomic alterations, the management of individuals resistant to epithelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) remains a formidable challenge. Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of available therapeutic regimens and to identify the optimal treatment strategy for patients with disease progression following EGFR-TKI therapy. Design: This is a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, along with conference proceedings from January 1, 2020, to June 1, 2025, were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing treatment options for advanced NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR-TKIs were eligible. We identified the optimal therapeutics through comparison of the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). Results: Overall, 19 RCTs involving 4,039 participants were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that sacituzumab tirumotecan (Sac-TMT) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.20, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.13–0.30) and overall survival (OS; HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20–0.66) compared to conventional chemotherapy as evidenced by its superior SUCRA values (0.997 for PFS and 0.946 for OS). Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) also demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy outcomes. Specifically, Sac-TMT showed statistically superior PFS benefits relative to nearly all comparator regimens, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based and bispecific antibody (bsAb)-based strategies (all p < 0.05). Amivantamab in combination with lazertinib and chemotherapy (SUCRA = 0.816) and ivonescimab combined with chemotherapy (SUCRA = 0.779) both exhibited capabilities in prolonging PFS. Notably, the triplet regimen was associated with the highest incidence of severe-grade AEs compared to all other treatment options. Conclusion: Sac-TMT, Dato-DXd, and bsAbs-based regimens were identified as the most efficacious options with manageable toxicity for advanced NSCLC patients who progressed after EGFR-TKIs. These findings underscore the pivotal role of innovative therapeutic agents, illuminating potential treatment avenues for this difficult-to-treat refractory population. Trial registration: This study was registered as INPLASY202510014.

Objectives: Differences in clinicopathological characteristics of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients may influence the immune response. This study aims to evaluate the heterogeneity of response to first-line chemoimmunotherapy between subgroups in ES-SCLC to screen out suitable populations.Materials and methods: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 3, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ES-SCLC chemoimmunotherapy. We also reviewed main conferences from January 1, 2021 to October 1, 2023. A trial-specific hazard ratio (HR) ratio for each subgroup was calculated, and these ratios were then pooled using the deft approach.Results: A total of 9 RCTs with 4099 patients were finally included. The pooled ratios were 0.92 (95% CI = 0.77 to 1.09) for OS-HRs and 0.79 (95% CI = 0.55 to 1.13) for PFS-HRs in women versus men. The pooled ratios of OS-HRs and PFS-HRs in patients with positive versus negative PD-L1 expression were 1.26 (95% CI = 0.91 to 1.73) and 1.08 (95% CI = 0.77 to 1.52), respectively. The pooled ratios of OS-HRs and PFS-HRs in patients without versus with brain metastasis were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.59 to 1.01) and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.44 to 1.12). No statistically significant differences were also found in terms of subgroups for age, liver metastasis, smoking status, ECOG PS, LDH level, type of platinum salt and race.Conclusion: Women or patients with negative PD-L1 expression or with LDH ≤ ULN or without brain metastasis tend to benefit more from first-line chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC. More trials are needed to prospectively validate the therapeutic heterogeneity among clinicopathological characteristics.Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-3-0064/ identifier, INPLASY202330064.