Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is an accurate imaging modality for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor. Because detection of distant metastases has a major impact on treatment, early diagnosis of metastatic spread is of great importance. So far, no standard procedure has become established for the early diagnosis of bone metastases from neuroendocrine tumor. We compared the diagnostic value of CT with that of the novel somatostatin analog ⁶⁸Ga-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N′′′-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe¹-Tyr³-octreotide (⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC) in the detection of such metastases. Methods: Fifty-one patients (22 women and 29 men; age range, 32–87 y) with histologically verified neuroendocrine tumor were included in this study. PET scans were fused with CT scans using a vacuum fixation device. ¹⁸F-NaF or ^99mTc-dicarboxypropane diphosphonate bone scans or clinical follow-up served as the reference standard. Results: Twelve of the 51 patients had no evidence of bone metastases on any of the available imaging modalities, and 37 patients had ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET results true-positive for bone metastases. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET results were true-negative for 12 patients, false-positive for one, and false-negative for another, resulting in a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 92%. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET detected bone metastases at a significantly higher rate than did CT (P < 0.001). Furthermore, conventional bone scans confirmed the results of somatostatin receptor PET but did not reveal additional tumors in any patients. Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET is a reliable, novel method for the early detection of bone metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumor. Our results show that CT and conventional bone scintigraphy are less accurate than ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET in the primary staging or restaging of neuroendocrine tumor.

Breast cancer represents a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite the advances in systemic therapies, the prognosis for patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) remains poor. Especially in case of failure or cessation of systemic treatments, surgical resection for BCLMs has been considered as the treatment standard despite a lack of robust evidence of benefit. However, due to the extent and location of disease and physical condition, the number of patients with BCLM who are eligible for surgery is limited. Palliative locoregional treatments of liver metastases (LM) include transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Percutaneous thermal ablation methods, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), are considered potentially curative local treatment options. They are less invasive, less expensive and have fewer contraindications and complication rates than surgery. Because conventional ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided single-probe thermal ablation is limited by tumor size, multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) with intraoperative image fusion for immediate, reliable judgment has been developed in order to treat large and multiple tumors within one session. This review focuses on the different minimally invasive local and locoregional treatment options for BCLM and attempts to describe their current and future role in the multidisciplinary treatment setting.

Background: HCC is the leading cause of cancer in chronic liver disease. A growing body of experimental mouse models supports the notion that gut-resident and liver-resident microbes control hepatic immune responses and, thereby, crucially contribute to liver tumorigenesis. However, a comprehensive characterization of the intestinal microbiome in fueling the transition from chronic liver disease to HCC in humans is currently missing. Methods: Here, we profiled the fecal, blood, and liver tissue microbiome of patients with HCC by 16S rRNA sequencing and compared profiles to nonmalignant cirrhotic and noncirrhotic NAFLD patients. Results: We report a distinct bacterial profile, defined from 16S rRNA gene sequences, with reduced α-and β-diversity in the feces of patients with HCC and cirrhosis compared to NAFLD. Patients with HCC and cirrhosis exhibited an increased proportion of fecal bacterial gene signatures in the blood and liver compared to NAFLD. Differential analysis of the relative abundance of bacterial genera identified an increased abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Bacteroidaceae in blood and liver tissue from both HCC and cirrhosis patients compared to NAFLD. Fecal samples from cirrhosis and HCC patients both showed a reduced abundance for several taxa, including short-chain fatty acid–producing genera, such as Blautia and Agathobacter. Using paired 16S rRNA and transcriptome sequencing, we identified a direct association between gut bacterial genus abundance and host transcriptome response within the liver tissue. Conclusions: Our study indicates perturbations of the intestinal and liver-resident microbiome as a critical determinant of patients with cirrhosis and HCC.

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall clinical outcome of multiprobe SRFA as a treatment for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatic resection (HR). A retrospective, single center study carried out between 2006 and 2018. 64 consecutive patients with recurrent or new CRLM after previous HR were treated by SRFA for 217 lesions (median size 2.7 cm, 1-7.5) in 103 ablation sessions. Endpoints consisted of i) technical efficacy ii) complication and mortality rates iii) local and distant recurrence, iv) disease free survival (DFS), and v) overall survival (OS). 213/217 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA (97.7% primary technical efficacy rate). Four tumors required repeat ablation, resulting in a secondary technical efficacy rate of 99.5% (216/217). Local recurrence developed in 25/217 lesions (11.5%). Major complication rate was 5.8% (6/103 sessions) and mortality rate was 1.0% (1/103 ablation sessions), respectively.1-, 3-, and 5- year OS rates from date of first SRFA were 90.1%, 46.2%, and 34.8% (median 33.1 months). DFS rates were 54.2%, 17.2%, and 17.2%, at 1-, 3- and 5- years, respectively (median 13.3 months). SRFA is a safe, feasible and effective option for CRLM after HR with low morbidity levels and favorable clinical outcome.