Treating opioid use disorder has reached a new level of challenge. Synthetic opioids and xylazine have joined the non-medical opioid supply, multiplying the complexities of caring for individuals in emergency departments (ED). This combination, known as 'tranq dope,' is poorly described in literature. Inadequate withdrawal treatment results in a disproportionately high rate of patient-directed discharges (also known as against medical advice dispositions, or AMA). This study aimed to describe a cohort of individuals who received a novel order set for suspected fentanyl and xylazine withdrawal in the ED. This is a descriptive study evaluating a cohort of ED patients who received withdrawal medications from a novel protocol and electronic health record order set. Individuals being assessed in the ED while suffering from withdrawal were eligible. Individuals under age 18, on stable outpatient MOUD or who were pregnant were excluded. Treatment strategies included micro-induction buprenorphine, short acting opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and other adjunctive medications. Data collected included: demographics including zip code, urine toxicology screening, order set utilization and disposition data. Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores were recorded, where available, before and following exposure to the medications. There were 270 patient encounters that occurred between September 14, 2022, and March 9, 2023 included in the total study cohort. Of those, 66 % were male, mean age 37 with 71 % residing within Philadelphia zip codes. 100 % of urine toxicology screenings were positive for fentanyl. Of the 177 patients with both pre- and post-exposure COWS scores documented, constituting the final cohort, patients receiving medications had their COWS score decrease from a median of 12 to a median of 4 (p < 0.001). The AMA rate for this cohort was 3.9 %, whereas the baseline for the population with OUD was 10.7 %. Recorded adverse effects were few and resolved without complication. Fentanyl and xylazine withdrawal are challenging for patients and providers. A novel tranq dope withdrawal order set may reduce both COWS scores and rate of patient-directed discharge in this cohort of patients, though further investigation is needed to confirm findings.

Background As patients become increasingly involved in their medical care, physician-patient communication gains importance. A previous study showed that physician self-disclosure (SD) of personal information by primary care providers decreased patient rating of the provider communication skills. Objective The objective of this study is to explore the incidence and impact of Emergency Department (ED) provider self-disclosure on patients’ rating of provider communication skills. Methods A survey was administered to 520 adult patients or parents of pediatric patients in a large tertiary care ED during the summer of 2014. The instrument asked patients whether the provider self-disclosed and subsequently asked patients to rate providers’ communication skills. We compared patients’ ratings of communication measurements between encounters where self-disclosure occurred to those where it did not. Results Patients reported provider SD in 18.9% of interactions. Provider SD was associated with more positive patient perception of provider communication skills (p<0.005), more positive ratings of provider rapport (p<0.05) and higher satisfaction with provider communication (p<0.05). Patients who noted SD scored their providers’ communication skills as “excellent” (63.4%) compared to patients without self-disclosure (47.1%). Patients reported that they would like to hear about their providers’ experiences with a similar chief complaint (64.4% of patients), their providers’ education (49%), family (33%), personal life (21%) or an injury/ailment unlike their own (18%). Patients responded that providers self-disclose to make patients comfortable/at ease and to build rapport. Conclusion Provider self-disclosure in the ED is common and is associated with higher ratings of provider communication, rapport, and patient satisfaction. Keywords Patient, resident, provider communication, education

Objectives: Medetomidine, a potent veterinary α2-adrenergic agonist, has emerged as an adulterant in the illicit fentanyl supply in Philadelphia, PA. Accompanying this change, a severe withdrawal syndrome, distinct from opioid and more comparable to dexmedetomidine withdrawal, emerged. We describe it. Methods: A multicenter case series is described across 3 hospital systems in Philadelphia between September 2024 and April 2025. The cohort included patients who reported opioids as the primary drug of choice, who presented with opioid withdrawal complicated by severe sympathetic activation and required hospitalization. Data extraction from the electronic health record included demographics, clinical outcomes, and confirmatory toxicology in a subset. Results: Two hundred nine patients met the inclusion criteria; the median age was 38 years and 29% were female. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission occurred in 77.5%, with 20.1% requiring intubation. Symptoms were often refractory to traditional opioid withdrawal management, and 73.7% received dexmedetomidine infusion. In the cohort subset with toxicology testing (n=43), 100% had fentanyl and medetomidine metabolites, while xylazine metabolites were not always present (24, 55.8%). Severe complications included encephalopathy (35.4%), myocardial injury (28.7%), and rarely seizures (5%). Patients suffered from severe withdrawal, with a median maximum recorded Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Score (COWS) score of 23. Conclusions: This study describes individuals experiencing severe withdrawal, temporally associated with medetomidine-adulterated fentanyl exposure. Clinicians should be alert to the limitations of standard withdrawal protocols for fentanyl or opioids and the need for aggressive α2-agonist therapies, such as dexmedetomidine. As medetomidine continues to spread in the illicit drug supply, adapting clinical and public health responses will be critical.

Medetomidine, a veterinary α2-adrenergic agonist, has recently emerged as an adulterant in the non-medical opioid supply, yet human exposure has remained poorly characterized. We conducted a pragmatic retrospective cohort analysis utilizing chart review and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) toxicology testing on available urine samples from patients presenting to two hospitals in Philadelphia, PA, who fit two clinical phenotypes, intoxication or withdrawal. Samples also underwent glucuronidase pre-treatment to assess impact on the yield of medetomidine and xylazine metabolite detection. Testing identified universal exposure to medetomidine (58/58 samples) via the 3-hydroxy-medetomidine (3-OH-M) metabolite, post glucuronidase treatment and variable xylazine exposure (40/58 samples). Importantly, 32% of medetomidine exposures would have been missed without enzymatic pre-treatment. Patients exhibited two distinct clinical phenotypes: intoxication, characterized primarily by sedation; bradycardia; and often hypotension, and withdrawal, presenting with life-threatening tachycardia; hypertension and often encephalopathy. Notably, clinical phenotype correlated with urinary concentrations of 3-OH-M but not xylazine. These findings underscore the critical need for heightened clinical awareness and need for contemporaneous toxicologic screening mechanisms for medetomidine exposure, emphasizing its distinct clinical presentations and the potential public health implications posed by its widespread adulteration in illicit opioids.

Introduction: Clinician educators are often asked to perform consultations for colleagues. Invitations to consult and advise others on local problems can help foster great collaborations between centres, and allows for an exchange of ideas between programs. In this article, the authors identify and summarize several key papers to assist emerging clinician educators with the consultation process. Methods: A consensus building process was used to generate a list of key papers that describe the importance and significance of educational consulting, informed by social media sources. A three-round voting methodology, akin to a Delphi study, determinedthe most impactful papers from the larger list. Results: Summaries of the five most highly rated papers on education consultation are presented in this paper. These papers were determined by a mixed group of junior and senior faculty members, who have summarized these papers with respect to their relevance for their peer groups. Conclusion: Five key papers on the educational consultation process are presented in this paper. These papers offer background and perspective to help junior faculty gain a grasp of consultation processes.

Background/Objectives: Philadelphia has experienced a surge in illicit fentanyl adulterated with alpha-2 agonist sedatives. Initially, xylazine (“tranq”) was the predominant adulterant, and a novel multimodal withdrawal protocol was effective at mitigating symptoms. However, since mid-2024, medetomidine—a more potent sedative—has largely supplanted xylazine. Clinicians have reported more severe, treatment-resistant opioid withdrawal during this transition. To assess whether a previously effective withdrawal management protocol retained efficacy after the emergence of medetomidine as the primary fentanyl adulterant in a community. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving protocol-based opioid withdrawal treatment at two emergency departments in Philadelphia between September 2022 and April 2025. Patients were divided into the xylazine era (September 2022–July 2024) and medetomidine era (August 2024–April 2025). The primary outcome was a change in Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score from pre- to post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included rates of discharge against medical advice (AMA) and ICU admission, as well as the impact of a revised treatment protocol. Results: Among 1269 encounters with full data, 616 occurred during the xylazine era and 770 during the medetomidine era. Median COWS reduction was greater in the xylazine group (−9.0 vs. −4.0 points, p < 0.001), with more patients achieving symptom relief (COWS ≤ 4: 65.6% vs. 14.2%, p < 0.001). ICU admission occurred in 8.5% of xylazine era patients and 16.8% of medetomidine era patients (p < 0.001). Rates of AMA were higher during the medetomidine era as well (6.5% vs. 3.6%) (p = 0.038). Revision of treatment protocols showed promise. Conclusions: The protocol was significantly less effective during the medetomidine era, though a protocol change may be helping. Findings highlight the need to adapt withdrawal treatment protocols in response to changes in the illicit drug supply.