To evaluate the effectiveness of intensive rehabilitation to support recovery of neurological function after brain tumor surgery and assess long-term satisfaction. This retrospective study included patients with neurological impairment after brain tumor surgery who underwent intensive rehabilitation therapy between December 2013 and May 2017. To assess effectiveness of rehabilitation, functional outcomes (motor, cognition, and activities of daily living [ADL]) were compared between brain tumor group and a control group enrolling stroke patients who received equivalent rehabilitation during the study period. Long-term satisfaction with rehabilitation was evaluated by surveying family caregivers. This study included 21 patients with benign brain tumor, 14 with malignant brain tumor, and 108 with stroke. Significant and similar improvement in motor, cognition, and ADL function were noted in both the brain tumor group and the stroke group. Malignancy status did not influence the extent of functional improvement. According to medical records and surveys, 9 (69.2%) patients with malignant tumor and 2 (11.8%) with benign tumor had expired by the time of the survey. Most family caregivers confirmed that rehabilitation was effective for functional improvement (>60%), expressing overall satisfaction and stating they would recommend such therapy to patients with similar conditions (approximately 70%). Intensive rehabilitation may help promote functional improvement following brain tumor surgery regardless of malignancy compared with stroke patients. Family caregivers expressed overall satisfaction with rehabilitation at long-term follow-up. These findings support the provision of intensive rehabilitation therapy for neurologic function recovery following brain tumor surgery.
1 January 2017 in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Our previous clinical studies demonstrated the synergistic therapeutic effect induced by co-administering recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in human umbilical cord blood (hUCB) therapy for children with cerebral palsy. However, the cellular mechanism beyond the beneficial effects in this combination therapy still needs to be elucidated. A hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) model of neonates, representing cerebral palsy, was prepared and randomly divided into five groups (hUCB+rhEPO combination, hUCB, and rhEPO treatments over HIE, HIE control, and sham). Seven days after, hUCB was administered intraperitoneally and the rhEPO injections were started. Neurobehavioral tests showed the best outcome in the combination therapy group, while the hUCB and rhEPO alone treatments also showed better outcomes compared with the control (p < 0.05). Inflammatory cytokines were downregulated by the treatments and attenuated most by the combination therapy (p < 0.05). The hUCB+rhEPO treatment also showed remarkable increase in phosphorylation of Akt and potentiation of anti-apoptotic responses with decreased Bax and increased Bcl-2 (p < 0.05). Pre-treatment of MK-2206, an Akt inhibitor, for the combination therapy depressed the anti-apoptotic effects. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the therapeutic effect of hUCB therapy might be potentiated by co-administration of rhEPO via augmentation of anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic responses related to the phosphorylation of Akt.
31 December 2018 in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
To investigate and demonstrate persistent increase of peak cough flow after mechanical in-exsufflator application, in patients with neuromuscular diseases and pneumonia. A mechanical in-exsufflator was applied with patients in an upright or semi-upright sitting position (pressure setting, +40 and -40 cmH2O; in-exsufflation times, 2-3 and 1-2 seconds, respectively). Patients underwent five cycles, with 20-30 second intervals to prevent hyperventilation. Peak cough flow without and with assistive maneuvers, was evaluated before, and 15 and 45 minutes after mechanical in-exsufflator application. Peak cough flow was 92.6 L/min at baseline, and 100.4 and 100.7 L/min at 15 and 45 minutes after mechanical in-exsufflator application, respectively. Assisted peak cough flow at baseline, 15 minutes, and 45 minutes after mechanical in-exsufflator application was 170.7, 179.3, and 184.1 L/min, respectively. While peak cough flow and assisted peak cough flow increased significantly at 15 minutes after mechanical in-exsufflator application compared with baseline (p=0.030 and p=0.016), no statistical difference was observed between 15 and 45 minutes. Increased peak cough flow after mechanical in-exsufflator application persists for at least 45 minutes.
1 January 2017 in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine