Milton Ruiz Alves

Dr. Milton Ruiz Alves

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Immune Network
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RSRodrigo G. de Souza
Rodrigo G. de Souza
Cintia De PaivaCintia De Paiva
Cintia De Paiva
MAMilton Ruiz Alves
Milton Ruiz Alves
De Souza RG, et al. Immune Netw. 2019 Feb;19(1):e3. https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2019.19.e3

4 November 2020 in The American Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRodrigo G. de Souza
Rodrigo G. de Souza
ZYZhiyuan Yu
Zhiyuan Yu
HHHumberto Hernandez
Humberto Hernandez
CTClaudia M. Trujillo-Vargas
Claudia M. Trujillo-Vargas
ALAndrea Lee
Andrea Lee
Cintia De PaivaCintia De Paiva
Cintia De Paiva

9 May 2024 in Clinics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Dillan Cunha AmaralDillan Cunha Amaral
Dillan Cunha Amaral
SBSávio Batista
Sávio Batista
ESEdson dos Santos-Neto
Edson dos Santos-Neto
JMJosé Eduardo Ferreira Manso
José Eduardo Ferreira Manso
MRMárcio Penha Morterá Rodrigues
Márcio Penha Morterá Rodrigues
Ricardo Noguera LouzadaRicardo Noguera Louzada
Ricardo Noguera Louzada
Low-Level Red-Light (LLRL) Therapy is a safe and natural way to promote healing and reduce inflammation in the body. When it comes to treating myopia in children, LLRL therapy is recent, and its efficacy and safety still are not clear. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature for LLRL was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines on November 5, 2022. Databases, including PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were queried. A meta-analysis of random effects was conducted. Inclusion criteria included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) or observational studies where LLRL therapy was used in children (3‒15 years old) with myopia. Exclusion criteria were studies with other ocular abnormalities. Efficacy was evaluated through the mean change in Axial Length (AL) and cycloplegic Spherical Equivalent Error (SER), while safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse effects. A total of 5 final studies were included (4 RCTs, and 1 observational), in which 685 total patients were analyzed. The mean age was 9.7 ± 0.66 years, with 48,2% female patients. The number of eyes in the LRLL arm is 714 and, in the control, arm is 656. LLRL showed better results in SER and AL mean change (OR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.83; p < 0.00001, and MD -0.33; 95% CI -0.52 to -0.13; p = 0.001, respectively), in comparison to the control group. There was no significant difference in adverse effects between groups (MD = 5.76; 95% CI 0.66 to 50.14; p = 0.11). LLRL therapy is a non-invasive, effective, and safe short-term treatment option; however, long-term evaluation, particularly in comparison to other therapies, requires additional investigation.

1 June 2000 in British Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRoberto Caldato
Roberto Caldato
RLRoberto Lauande-Pimentel
Roberto Lauande-Pimentel
NSNelson A Sabrosa
Nelson A Sabrosa
RFRoberto A Fonseca
Roberto A Fonseca
RPRaquel S Paiva
Raquel S Paiva
NJNewton K José
Newton K José
AIMS To verify and evaluate the effect of reinsertion of the lower eyelid retractor aponeurosis to correct involutional entropion. METHODS The involutional entropion is one affection that occurs mainly in the lower eyelid of patients over 60 years old. The surgical techniques proposed to correct this condition are based on correction of horizontal laxity—the preseptal orbicularis muscle overrides the pretarsal muscle, and the reinsertion of the lower eyelid retractor aponeurosis. 30 patients clinically diagnosed with involutional entropion and randomly selected underwent reinsertion of the lower eyelid retractor aponeurosis to the tarsal plate, without horizontal shortening or resection of the skin or orbicularis muscle. RESULTS Good anatomical and functional correction was achieved in 96.6% of the patients and no recurrence was observed on 29 month follow up examination. The surgical result was very satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS It was concluded that this procedure is effective and has low recurrence rate, showing the important role of the reinsertion of the lower eyelid retractor aponeurosis in this surgical correction.

1 August 2010 in Journal of Refractive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJackson Barreto
Jackson Barreto
MBMirella T.S. Barboni
Mirella T.S. Barboni
CFClaudia Feitosa-Santana
Claudia Feitosa-Santana
JSJoao Ricardo Sato
Joao Ricardo Sato
SBSamir J. Bechara
Samir J. Bechara
MAMilton Ruiz Alves
Milton Ruiz Alves
Purpose: To compare intraocular straylight measurements and contrast sensitivity after wavefront-guided LASIK (WFG LASIK) in one eye and wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (WFG PRK) in the fellow eye for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction. Methods: A prospective, randomized study of 22 eyes of 11 patients who underwent simultaneous WFG LASIK and WFG PRK (contralateral eye). Both groups were treated with the NIDEK Advanced Vision Excimer Laser System, and a microkeratome was used for flap creation in the WFG LASIK group. High and low contrast visual acuity, wavefront analysis, contrast sensitivity, and retinal straylight measurements were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A third-generation straylight meter, C-Quant (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), was used for measuring intraocular straylight. Results: Twelve months postoperatively, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was −0.06±0.07 logMAR in the WFG LASIK group and −0.10±0.10 logMAR in the WFG PRK group. Mean preoperative intraocular straylight was 0.94±0.12 log s for the WFG LASIK group and 0.96±0.11 log s for the WFG PRK group. After 12 months, the mean straylight value was 1.01±0.1 log s for the WFG LASIK group and 0.97±0.12 log s for the WFG PRK group. No difference was found between techniques after 12 months ( P =.306). No significant difference in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity between groups was noted. Conclusions: Intraocular straylight showed no statistically significant increase 1 year after WFG LASIK and WFG PRK. Higher order aberrations increased significantly after surgery for both groups. Nevertheless, WFG LASIK and WFG PRK yielded excellent visual acuity and contrast sensitivity performance without significant differences between techniques.