Timothée Poisot

Dr. Timothée Poisot

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 June 2018 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EDEva Delmas
Eva Delmas
MBMathilde Besson
Mathilde Besson
MBMarie‐Hélène Brice
Marie‐Hélène Brice
LBLaura A. Burkle
Laura A. Burkle
GRGiulio V. Dalla Riva
Giulio V. Dalla Riva
TPTimothée Poisot
Timothée Poisot

20 September 2012 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TPTimothée Poisot
Timothée Poisot
ECElsa Canard
Elsa Canard
DMDavid Mouillot
David Mouillot
NMNicolas Mouquet
Nicolas Mouquet
DGDominique Gravel
Dominique Gravel

4 November 2014 in Oikos
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TPTimothée Poisot
Timothée Poisot
DSDaniel B. Stouffer
Daniel B. Stouffer
DGDominique Gravel
Dominique Gravel

1 February 2013 in Trends in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJoshua Weitz
Joshua Weitz
TPTimothée Poisot
Timothée Poisot
JMJustin R. Meyer
Justin R. Meyer
CFCesar O. Flores
Cesar O. Flores
SVSergi Valverde
Sergi Valverde
MHMichael E. Hochberg
Michael E. Hochberg

23 June 2011 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPTimothée Poisot
Timothée Poisot
JBJames D. Bever
James D. Bever
ANAdnane Nemri
Adnane Nemri
PTPeter H. Thrall
Peter H. Thrall
MHMichael E. Hochberg
Michael E. Hochberg
Ecology Letters(2011)14: 841–851 Ecological specialisation concerns all species and underlies many major ecological and evolutionary patterns. Yet its status as a unifying concept is not always appreciated because of its similarity to concepts of the niche, the many levels of biological phenomena to which it applies, and the complexity of the mechanisms influencing it. The evolution of specialisation requires the coupling of constraints on adaptive evolution with covariation of genotype and environmental performance. This covariation itself depends upon organismal properties such as dispersal behaviour and life history and complexity in the environment stemming from factors such as species interactions and spatio‐temporal heterogeneity in resources. Here, we develop a view on specialisation that integrates across the range of biological phenomena with the goal of developing a more predictive conceptual framework that specifically accounts for the importance of biotic complexity and coevolutionary events.

30 September 2014 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCatherine Hobaiter
Catherine Hobaiter
TPTimothée Poisot
Timothée Poisot
KZKlaus Zuberbühler
Klaus Zuberbühler
WHWill J Hoppitt
Will J Hoppitt
TGThibaud Gruber
Thibaud Gruber
Social network analysis methods have made it possible to test whether novel behaviors in animals spread through individual or social learning. To date, however, social network analysis of wild populations has been limited to static models that cannot precisely reflect the dynamics of learning, for instance, the impact of multiple observations across time. Here, we present a novel dynamic version of network analysis that is capable of capturing temporal aspects of acquisition—that is, how successive observations by an individual influence its acquisition of the novel behavior. We apply this model to studying the spread of two novel tool-use variants, “moss-sponging” and “leaf-sponge re-use,” in the Sonso chimpanzee community of Budongo Forest, Uganda. Chimpanzees are widely considered the most “cultural” of all animal species, with 39 behaviors suspected as socially acquired, most of them in the domain of tool-use. The cultural hypothesis is supported by experimental data from captive chimpanzees and a range of observational data. However, for wild groups, there is still no direct experimental evidence for social learning, nor has there been any direct observation of social diffusion of behavioral innovations. Here, we tested both a static and a dynamic network model and found strong evidence that diffusion patterns of moss-sponging, but not leaf-sponge re-use, were significantly better explained by social than individual learning. The most conservative estimate of social transmission accounted for 85% of observed events, with an estimated 15-fold increase in learning rate for each time a novice observed an informed individual moss-sponging. We conclude that group-specific behavioral variants in wild chimpanzees can be socially learned, adding to the evidence that this prerequisite for culture originated in a common ancestor of great apes and humans, long before the advent of modern humans. Chimpanzees are widely considered as the most “cultural” of all animals, despite the lack of direct evidence for the spread of novel behaviors through social learning in the wild. Here, we present a novel, dynamic network-based diffusion analysis to describe the acquisition patterns of novel tool-use behavior in the Sonso chimpanzee community of Budongo Forest, Uganda. We find strong evidence for social transmission of “moss-sponging” (the production of a sponge consisting of moss) along the innovators' social network, demonstrating that wild chimpanzees learn novel tool-use behaviors from each other and supporting the more general claim that some of the observed behavioral diversity in wild chimpanzees should be interpreted as “cultural.” Our model also estimated that, for each new observation, naïve individuals enhanced their chances of developing moss-sponging by a factor of 15. We conclude that group-specific behavioral variants can be socially learned in wild chimpanzees, addressing an important critique of the claim of culture in our closest relatives.