This two-study investigation aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS). In study 1 (N = 236 adults) confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the factorial structure of the scale. Study 2 (N = 177) assessed the concurrent and predictive validity of GAAIS. Concurrent validity was examined by correlating positive and negative attitude scores toward AI with another measure of attitude toward AI. Predictive validity was assessed by measuring the predictive ability of attitude on intention to use AI. The findings support the two-factor model, including for this Italian version of the scale consistent with the original one (Study 1). Moreover, positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence, as measured by the GAAIS positive factor, were positively correlated with general attitudes towards the use of AI, while the negative factor showed a significant negative correlation with the same general attitudes (Study 2). Then, the Italian version of the GAAIS can be considered as a valid tool for assessing people orientations towards artificial intelligence in the context analyzed, confirming the relevance of studying attitudes and its measurement towards artificial intelligence in different cultural contexts. This measure which relates to a strong psychosocial perspective, may support future research to deepen the understanding of the factors influencing attitudes towards AI as well as to develop more effective communication and training program interventions, being this a very crucial topic in actual society.

The study of the zoonotic parasites of the genus Anisakis and human anisakiasis is an increasingly hot topic in evolutionary biology and epidemiological studies carried out on natural and accidental (human) hosts, given the risk of this parasite to human health. However, the assessment of social-psychological factors relevant to Anisakis’ risky consumption of human behavior is still an understudied topic. Given the centrality of the topic, highlighted by its presence in Goals 2 (subgoal 2.1, achieve food security and improve safe nutrition) and 3 (health and well-being) of the 2030 Agenda, it appears necessary to deepen our social-psychological knowledge regarding this specific topic. There is plenty of psychological research focused on antecedents of fish and seafood consumption; however, parasite risk is not often specifically examined. This research is aimed at increasing the safety of consumers’ seafood products by examining their psychological aspects, such as knowledge, perception, awareness, and concern about Anisakis. Past and future behavior intentions were also investigated. Analyses were carried out on a sample of 251 subjects, and a path analysis model was used to explain possible relations assumed among the variables. The results of the study showed that habits related to raw fish consumption and self-perceived health were, respectively, positively, and negatively correlated with a higher perceived risk of contracting anisakiasis. This perceived risk in turn correlates positively with a greater willingness to pay for Anisakis-free fish. Similarly, prior knowledge of the disease was found to be associated with prior avoidance of fish consumption, which in turn was found to be positively correlated with a greater willingness to pay for Anisakis-free fish.

Job crafting—employees’ proactive modification of their work—has gained attention as a potential stress management strategy. This study examined how job crafting dimensions moderate relationships between work conditions and stress perceptions. Integrating Effort–Reward Imbalance and Job Demands–Resources models, we tested whether three job crafting dimensions (increasing structural resources, social resources, and challenging demands) moderate the translation of factual work conditions into stress perceptions. Survey data from 376 Italian employees revealed that factual effort and reward indicators positively predicted their perceived counterparts. Contrary to expectations, increasing structural resources amplified rather than buffered the effort perception relationship, suggesting that certain crafting strategies may heighten rather than reduce awareness of work demands. As hypothesized, increasing social resources buffered the effort relationship and strengthened the reward relationship. Increasing challenging demands showed no significant moderating effects. These findings reveal that job crafting dimensions have differential rather than uniformly positive effects on stress perception processes. While social crafting appears consistently beneficial, structural crafting may have unintended consequences under certain conditions. Organizations should recognize that job crafting interventions require nuanced implementation. The study advances theory by demonstrating boundary conditions for job crafting effectiveness and challenging assumptions about its uniformly positive effects.

The construction of a fulfilling career and the people management processes within organizations, like the selection of personnel, require a multidisciplinary approach that takes into account psychological, social, and cultural factors. Various concepts have been suggested to explain work motivations and organizational outcomes, including work values. Work values can encompass individual preferences, as well as moral standards and social norms. This broad definition has led to a variety of work value measurement instruments. One brief and cutting-edge measure that integrates different approaches is the New Work Values Scale (NWVS). The aim of this study was to validate the Italian form of this measure (NWVS-I). A sample of 397 Italian adults from 19 to 66 years of age (M = 30.78, SD = 13.38) participated in the study and completed both the New Work Values Scale—Italian form (NWVS-I) and the Portraits Value Questionnaire (PVQ). First, we evaluated the structure of the New Work Values Scale—Italian form (NWVS-I) through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), followed by a concurrent validity analysis correlating the dimensions of the New Work Values Scale—Italian form (NWVS-I) with those assessed by the Portraits Value Questionnaire (PVQ). We also tested gender invariance. The results confirmed the factor structure of the scale and its validity in the Italian context. The New Work Values Scale—Italian form (NWVS-I) is a useful measure in understanding the work values of individuals in the Italian context. This measure can be used for a wide range of applications, contributing to promoting greater awareness of one’s values and facilitating career choices, personnel selection, and people management aligned with a vision of sustainable organizational development.