Claudia Kesch

Dr. Claudia Kesch

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 November 2016 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Frederik L. GieselFrederik L. Giesel
Frederik L. Giesel
BHB. Hadaschik
B. Hadaschik
JCJens Cardinale
Jens Cardinale
JRJ. Radtke
J. Radtke
MVM. Vinsensia
M. Vinsensia
CKC. Kratochwil
C. Kratochwil
Purpose The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted positron-emitting-tomography (PET) tracer 68Ga-PSMA-11 shows great promise in the detection of prostate cancer. However, 68Ga has several shortcomings as a radiolabel including short half-life and non-ideal energies, and this has motivated consideration of 18F-labelled analogs. 18F-PSMA-1007 was selected among several 18F-PSMA-ligand candidate compounds because it demonstrated high labelling yields, outstanding tumor uptake and fast, non-urinary background clearance. Here, we describe the properties of 18F-PSMA-1007 in human volunteers and patients. Methods Radiation dosimetry of 18F-PSMA-1007 was determined in three healthy volunteers who underwent whole-body PET-scans and concomitant blood and urine sampling. Following this, ten patients with high-risk prostate cancer underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT (1 h and 3 h p.i.) and normal organ biodistribution and tumor uptakes were examined. Eight patients underwent prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Uptake in intra-prostatic lesions and lymph node metastases were correlated with final histopathology, including PSMA immunostaining. Results With an effective dose of approximately 4.4–5.5 mSv per 200–250 MBq examination, 18F-PSMA-1007 behaves similar to other PSMA-PET agents as well as to other 18F-labelled PET-tracers. In comparison to other PSMA-targeting PET-tracers, 18F-PSMA-1007 has reduced urinary clearance enabling excellent assessment of the prostate. Similar to 18F-DCFPyL and with slightly slower clearance kinetics than PSMA-11, favorable tumor-to-background ratios are observed 2–3 h after injection. In eight patients, diagnostic findings were successfully validated by histopathology. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT detected 18 of 19 lymph node metastases in the pelvis, including nodes as small as 1 mm in diameter. Conclusion 18F-PSMA-1007 performs at least comparably to 68Ga-PSMA-11, but its longer half-life combined with its superior energy characteristics and non-urinary excretion overcomes some practical limitations of 68Ga-labelled PSMA-targeted tracers.

1 November 2016 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJan Philipp Radtke
Jan Philipp Radtke
CSConstantin Schwab
Constantin Schwab
MWMaya B. Wolf
Maya B. Wolf
MFMartin T. Freitag
Martin T. Freitag
CACeline D. Alt
Celine D. Alt
BHBoris A. Hadaschik
Boris A. Hadaschik

1 September 2017 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FDFlorian A. Distler
Florian A. Distler
JRJan P. Radtke
Jan P. Radtke
DBDavid Bonekamp
David Bonekamp
CKClaudia Kesch
Claudia Kesch
HSHeinz-Peter Schlemmer
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
BHBoris A. Hadaschik
Boris A. Hadaschik
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging has an emerging role in prostate cancer diagnostics. In addition, clinical information is a reliable predictor of significant prostate cancer. We analyzed whether the negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule out significant prostate cancer could be improved using clinical factors, especially prostate specific antigen density. A total of 1,040 consecutive men with suspicion of prostate cancer underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging first, followed by transperineal systematic and magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy. Logistic regression analyses were performed to test different clinical factors as predictors of significant prostate cancer and build nomograms. To simplify these nomograms for clinical use patients were stratified into 3 prostate specific antigen density groups, including group 1-less than 0.07, group 2-0.07 to 0.15 and group 3-greater than 0.15 ng/ml/ml. After stratification we calculated the negative predictive value of a PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) Likert score of less than 3. Significant prostate cancer was defined as a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or greater. High grade prostate cancer was defined as a Gleason score of 4 + 3 or greater. Overall 451 men were diagnosed with significant prostate cancer, including 187 with a Gleason score of 4 + 3 or greater. On ROC curve analyses the predictive power of the developed nomogram for significant prostate cancer showed a higher AUC than that of PI-RADS alone (0.79 vs 0.75, p <0.001). The negative predictive value of harboring significant prostate cancer increased in men with unsuspicious magnetic resonance imaging from 79% up to 89% when prostate specific antigen density was 0.15 ng/ml/ml or less. In the repeat biopsy setting the negative predictive value of significant prostate cancer increased from 83% to 93%. The negative predictive value to harbor high grade prostate cancer increased from 92% up to 98% in the entire cohort. Using prostate specific antigen density combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging improved the negative predictive value of PI-RADS scoring. By increasing the probability of ruling out significant prostate cancer approximately 20% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided safely.

1 December 2017 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJan Philipp Radtke
Jan Philipp Radtke
MWManuel Wiesenfarth
Manuel Wiesenfarth
CKClaudia Kesch
Claudia Kesch
MFMartin T. Freitag
Martin T. Freitag
CACeline D. Alt
Celine D. Alt
BHBoris A. Hadaschik
Boris A. Hadaschik

13 April 2017 in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKClaudia Kesch
Claudia Kesch
CKClemens Kratochwil
Clemens Kratochwil
WMWalter Mier
Walter Mier
Klaus KopkaKlaus Kopka
Klaus Kopka
FGFrederik L. Giesel
Frederik L. Giesel

11 October 2017 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NHNienke L. Hansen
Nienke L. Hansen
TBTristan Barrett
Tristan Barrett
CKClaudia Kesch
Claudia Kesch
LPLana Pepdjonovic
Lana Pepdjonovic
DBDavid Bonekamp
David Bonekamp
CKChristof Kastner
Christof Kastner