Malpei Francesca

Prof. Malpei Francesca

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2019 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tommaso LottiTommaso Lotti
Tommaso Lotti
emiliano carrettiemiliano carretti
emiliano carretti
DBDebora Berti
Debora Berti
MMMaria Raffaella Martina
Maria Raffaella Martina
CLClaudio Lubello
Claudio Lubello
MFMalpei Francesca
Malpei Francesca

15 February 2022 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BLBeatrice Dal Pio Luogo
Beatrice Dal Pio Luogo
TSToufic Salim
Toufic Salim
WZWenjing Zhang
Wenjing Zhang
Nanna B. HartmannNanna B. Hartmann
Nanna B. Hartmann
MFMalpei Francesca
Malpei Francesca
Victor Manuel Candelario LealVictor Manuel Candelario Leal
Victor Manuel Candelario Leal
This study compares the performance of a microfiltration membrane, made by silicon carbide (SiC) and an ultrafiltration membrane, made by zirconia (ZrO2), in the treatment of wastewater from a washing machine designed to clean industrial tents. The filtration of deionized water, containing model microplastics (i.e., nylon fiber), was performed. This was followed by the filtration of real wastewater from a single washing cycle of industrial tents, made from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) textile. The filtration parameters of the membranes and physical-chemical parameters of the wastewater, including the concentration of microplastics in the shape of tent fibers (PVC), were calculated before and after filtration. The microfiltration membrane manifested a greater decrease in permeability (95%) compared to the ultrafiltration membrane (37%). The resulting water quality in terms of Total Solids, turbidity, and microplastics concentration was better for the ultrafiltration. This is evident from 99.2% versus 98.55% removal efficiency of microplastics from the laundering wastewater, respectively.

1 March 2022 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGiovanni Dolci
Giovanni Dolci
VVValeria Venturelli
Valeria Venturelli
Arianna CatenacciArianna Catenacci
Arianna Catenacci
RCRiccardo Ciapponi
Riccardo Ciapponi
MFMalpei Francesca
Malpei Francesca
MGMario Grosso
Mario Grosso

1 March 2014 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCecilia Sambusiti
Cecilia Sambusiti
MRManuela Rollini
Manuela Rollini
EFElena Ficara
Elena Ficara
Alida MusattiAlida Musatti
Alida Musatti
MMM. Manzoni
M. Manzoni
MFMalpei Francesca
Malpei Francesca

4 November 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Arianna CatenacciArianna Catenacci
Arianna Catenacci
MGMatteo Grana
Matteo Grana
MFMalpei Francesca
Malpei Francesca
EFElena Ficara
Elena Ficara
Anaerobic co-digestion in wastewater treatment plants is looking increasingly like a straightforward solution to many issues arising from the operation of mono-digestion. Process modelling is relevant to predict plant behavior and its sensitivity to operational parameters, and to assess the feasibility of simultaneously feeding a digester with different organic wastes. Still, much work has to be completed to turn anaerobic digestion modelling into a reliable and practical tool. Indeed, the complex biochemical processes described in the ADM1 model require the identification of several parameters and many analytical determinations for substrate characterization. A combined protocol including batch Biochemical Methane Potential tests and analytical determinations is proposed and applied for substrate influent characterization to simulate a pilot-scale anaerobic digester where co-digestion of waste sludge and expired yogurt was operated. An iterative procedure was also developed to improve the fit of batch tests for kinetic parameter identification. The results are encouraging: the iterative procedure significantly reduced the Theil’s Inequality Coefficient (TIC), used to evaluate the goodness of fit of the model for alkalinity, total volatile fatty acids, pH, COD, volatile solids, and ammoniacal nitrogen. Improvements in the TIC values, compared to the first iteration, ranged between 30 and 58%.

1 May 2003 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MFMalpei Francesca
Malpei Francesca
LBL. Bonomo
L. Bonomo
ARA. Rozzi
A. Rozzi
A pilot plant membrane bioreactor has been tested in parallel with a full-scale activated sludge wastewater treatment plant fed on the wastewater from a textile factory. The possibility to upgrade the final effluent for internal reuse was investigated. The pilot and full-scale plants are located in a textile factory (Boselli & C., Olgiate Comasco, North Italy) which manufactures and finishes polyester fabric. The activated sludge wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is an extended aeration system. The MBR pilot plant is a ZW-10 bench hollow fibre module (membrane surface area: 0.93 m2) submerged in a 200 L tank. Performance and operation of the membrane bioreactor (MBR) were evaluated in terms of permeate characteristics and variability (COD, colour, total N and P, microbiological counts), of membrane specific flux (l m−2 h−1 bar−1) and other operational parameters (sludge growth and yield).