Coronary artery disease is one of the leading public health problems in the world in terms of mortality and economic burden from the disease. Traditionally, the focus of research and clinical pathways leading to the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease was on the more common variant of the disease resulting from atherosclerosis in the epicardial coronary arteries. However, coronary microvasculature, representing the vast majority of the total heart circulation, has the greatest influence on overall coronary resistance and, therefore, blood flow. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), characterized by structural or functional abnormalities in the microvasculature, significantly impacts myocardial perfusion. Endothelial dysfunction results in inadequate coronary dilation during exercise or spontaneous spasm in the microvasculature or epicardial arteries. A significant proportion of people presenting for coronary angiography in the context of angina have unobstructed epicardial coronary arteries yet are falsely reassured about the benign nature of their condition. Meanwhile, increasing evidence indicates that patients diagnosed with CMD as well as vasospastic angina (VSA) face an increased risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs), including death. The aim of this review is to outline the current practice with regard to invasive and non-invasive methods of CMD and VSA diagnosis and assess the evidence supporting the existing treatment strategies. These include endotype-specific pharmacological therapies, a holistic approach to lifestyle modifications and risk factor management and novel non-pharmacological therapies. Furthermore, the review highlights critical gaps in research and suggests potential areas for future investigation, to improve understanding and management of these conditions.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of cardiovascular death in octogenarians. This group of patients represents nearly a fifth of all patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in real-world practice. Octogenarians have multiple risk factors for CAD and often greater myocardial ischemia than younger counterparts, with a potential of an increased benefit from myocardial revascularization. Despite this, octogenarians are routinely under-treated and belittled in clinical trials. Age does make a difference to PCI outcomes in older people, but it is never the sole arbiter of any clinical decision, whether in relation to the heart or any other aspect of health. The decision when to perform revascularization in elderly patients and especially in octogenarians is complex and should consider the patient on an individual basis, with clarification of the goals of the therapy and the relative risks and benefits of performing the procedure. In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), there is no upper age limit regarding urgent reperfusion and primary PCI must be the standard of care. In non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, a strict conservative strategy must be avoided; whereas the use of a routine invasive strategy may reduce the occurrence of MI and need for revascularization at follow-up, with no established benefit in terms of mortality. In stable CAD patients, invasive therapy on top of the optimal medical therapy seems better in symptom relief and quality of life. This review summarizes the available data on percutaneous revascularization in the elderly patients and particularly in octogenarians, including practical considerations on PCI risk secondary to ageing physiology. We also analyse technical difficulties met when considering PCI in this cohort and the ongoing need for further studies to ameliorate risk stratification and eventually outcomes in these challenging patients.

Background: Invasive coronary function testing (CFT) is indicated in patients with refractory angina with non-obstructed coronary arteries (ANOCA). Despite this, questions remain regarding patient selection for testing, safety and integration of CFT within clinical pathways and the impact that endotyping has on long term management of these patients. This study aims to investigate the safety of CFT in patients presenting with anginal chest pain, the prevalence of ANOCA endotypes in the tested population, and the impact of CFT on prescribed medical therapy and secondary care resource utilisation. Methods: A retrospective analysis of electronic case records of 159 consecutive patients who underwent complete invasive CFT at two UK centres between June 2022 and December 2024 was performed. All patients were tested for endothelium-independent coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and coronary vasospasm (vasospastic angina (VSA)). 44 patients (27.6%) also underwent endothelial function assessment. The median length of follow-up was 9 months (IQR 4–16). Results: An ANOCA endotype was identified in 101 patients (63.5%) (CFT+ve). Of those, 24 (23.8%) were diagnosed with isolated CMD, 53 (52.4%) with isolated VSA and 24 (23.8%) with a mixed endotype. Five (3.1%) experienced intraprocedural adverse events. In 123 patients (77.3%), CFT led to a change in medical therapy. Re-hospitalisation for recurrent chest pain occurred in 21.7% of CFT+ve and 13.7% of CFT−ve patients, with the majority re-presenting within 6 months of CFT. VSA was linked to higher re-hospitalisation odds (OR 2.64 (1.10–6.33), p=0.03), and patients with VSA tended to re-present earlier than others (p=0.017). Higher antianginal therapy prescription and prior emergency presentations were also predictive of risk of re-presentation (OR 1.61, p=0.02 and OR 4.18, p=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: CFT testing had low intraprocedural risk and influenced onward management. Hospitalisation for chest pain post CFT testing was common. Further refinement of clinical pathways, including early follow-up for medical optimisation, is suggested.