Background and Objective: Perianal pathologies are the most common cause of perianal infections in patients with hematological malignancies. Perianal infection diagnosis in this group of patients is difficult, thus careful anorectal examination is necessary, with imaging modalities. The literature revealed a knowledge gap on the approach of anal pathologies in patients with neutropenia during diagnosis or chemotherapy. This study aimed to examine our institutional data of perianal complications and investigate the relationship among the white blood cell-neutrophil count, perianal lesion, and the type of treatment in patients with hematologic malignancies during the neutropenic period. Methods: Patients with a hematologic malignancy, hospitalized for cytotoxic chemotherapy, complicated by perianal pathology, and documented by at least one imaging method were included in the study. Results: A total of 42 patients were included in the study. The comparison between the groups revealed no statistical significance between the anal abscess formation and the neutrophil count and previous perianal pathology. A statistical significance in favor of acute myeloid leukemia was found between patient diagnosis and anal abscess development. An inverse relationship was found between the number of white blood cells at hospitalization and having an anal pathology operation. It was observed that patients with high white blood cell count were less operated on due to anal pathology. Conclusions: In conclusion, this article has shown that white blood cell count at the time of hospitalization in patients with hematological malignancy, can affect the operation status of patients due to anal pathologies that may occur in the neutropenic period.

The impact of inflammatory markers such as systemic immune-inflammation (SII) index and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) on myelofibrosis (MF) prognosis was evaluated for the first time in this study. Data from 60 patients diagnosed with MF between March 2011 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to disease-related markers, the impact of SII and SIRI on prognosis was evaluated. In our study, the overall median survival (OS) was 64 months. OS was significantly shorter in patients older than 65 years, with high ferritin and lymphocyte levels, transfusion dependence at diagnosis, platelet count below 100 × 10⁹/L, Hb level below 8 g/dl, and high risk according to the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)-Plus score. When these variables were included in the multivariate Cox regression model, it was found that being older than 65 years, having a high ferritin value, being at high risk according to the DIPSS-plus score and Hb values below 8 increased the risk of death. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and SII index were lower in patients with a fatal outcome. No statistically significant relationship was found between SIRI and mortality. The findings of this study showed that low PLR and high ferritin were associated with poor prognosis in MF. Elevated SII and SIRI, evaluated for the first time in patients with myelofibrosis, did not predict prognosis. Since non-inflammatory variables play a role in the pathogenesis of MF, bone marrow indicators and systemic inflammation indicators derived from hematologic parameters may not be accurate.

Background: Although the cure rates of classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) are as high as 90% using the current treatment protocols, the prognosis is poor for primary refractory patients. Thus, a biomarker that can predict patients with early progression at the time of diagnosis is an unmet clinical need. Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and its variant modified EASIX (mEASIX) is a scoring system currently used for the prediction of prognosis in hematologic malignancies. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the mEASIX score in newly diagnosed cHL patients. Methods: Data from 206 patients who underwent positron emission tomography (PET)-guided doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) therapy for cHL between January 2007 and November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic value of the mEASIX score was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Cox regression analysis, and the Kaplan–Meier method, and then compared with standard risk assessment methods. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 33 years, and the rate of patients in the advanced stage was 67%. ROC analysis determined an optimal mEASIX score cut-off of 17.28, categorizing patients into mEASIX^high (47%) and mEASIX^low (53%) groups. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (60% vs. 84.3%) and overall survival (OS) (79.6% vs. 95.8%) were significantly lower in the mEASIX^high group (p < 0.001). Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that the independent variables affecting PFS included the nodular sclerosing subtype (HR: 0.4), bone marrow involvement (HR: 2.6), and elevated mEASIX (HR: 3.1). Independent variables, which had an effect on OS included elevated mEASIX (HR:3.8) and higher IPS-3 scores (HR:1.9). Furthermore, a higher mEASIX score (≥17.28) was identified as an independent variable indicating primary refractory disease (OR: 6.5). Conclusions: mEASIX is a powerful and easy-to-access marker for the detection of primary refractory disease and prognosis in newly diagnosed cHL cases.

Objective: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among neutropenic patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and stem cell transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life impact of posaconazole prophylaxis. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four adult patients were included with AML under remission induction chemotherapy and posaconazole prophylaxis. The 34 patients in the control group did not receive primary antifungal prophylaxis. The period between June 2006 and January 2009, when antifungal prophylaxis was not administered (control group), was retrospectively compared to the period between December 2010 and May 2012 when primary oral posaconazole prophylaxis was administered in similar conditions (posaconazole group) according to the use of antifungal agents for treatment, breakthrough infections, galactomannan performance, and the necessity for performing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedures. Results: The two groups were compared according to the use of antifungal agents; progression to a different antifungal agent was found in 34/34 patients (100%) in the control group and in 9/84 patients (11%) in the posaconazole group (p<0.001). There were four breakthrough IFIs (4/84, 4.8%) in the posaconazole group and 34 IFIs in the control group (p<0.001). In addition, 15/34 patients (44%) in the control group required BAL compared to 11/84 patients (13%) in the posaconazole group (p<0.001). Posaconazole treatment was discontinued within 7-14 days in 7/84 patients (8.3%) due to poor oral compliance related to mucositis after chemotherapy. Conclusion: Posaconazole appears to be effective and well-tolerated protection against IFIs for AML patients.

Background and Objectives: Bleeding is a major cause of mortality in cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The predictive power of the standard International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) score for bleeding in patients diagnosed with AML is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the standard ISTH score and modified versions in predicting bleeding among acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL, M3) and non-APL AML subgroups. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 190 AML patients (61 APL, 129 non-APL). The predictive power of the original ISTH score and eight different modified scores—incorporating parameters such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and genetic positivity—for DIC-related bleeding was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: In the APL group, the original ISTH score was statistically significant in predicting DIC-related bleeding (AUC = 0.727), but the modifications did not improve performance. In the non-APL AML group, the original score did not predict bleeding (AUC = 0.632, p = 0.079). However, a modified ISTH score excluding D-dimer and including LDH (≥800 mg/dL) and genetic positivity significantly improved prediction (AUC = 0.710, p = 0.005). This modification increased specificity from 48.2% to 60.7% and sensitivity from 76.5% to 82.4%. Conclusions: A subtype-specific approach is required to predict bleeding risk in AML-associated DIC. Modified ISTH scores remain suboptimal for APL; however, a modified score incorporating LDH and genetic status represents a promising tool to identify non-APL AML patients at risk of bleeding and warrants prospective validation.