Rodolfo Maduri

Dr. Rodolfo Maduri

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Martin N. StienenMartin N. Stienen
Martin N. Stienen
MGMenno Germans
Menno Germans
JBJan-Karl Burkhardt
Jan-Karl Burkhardt
MNMarian C. Neidert
Marian C. Neidert
CFChristian Fung
Christian Fung
MCMarco Corniola
Marco Corniola
Background and Purpose—: To identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and to estimate their impact. Methods—: Retrospective analysis of prospective data from a nationwide multicenter registry on all aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage cases admitted to a tertiary neurosurgical department in Switzerland (Swiss SOS [Swiss Study on Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage]; 2009–2015). Both clinical and radiological independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were identified, and their effect size was determined by calculating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariate logistic regression. Survival was displayed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results—: Data of n=1866 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients in the Swiss SOS database were available. In-hospital mortality was 20% (n=373). In n=197 patients (10.6%), active treatment was discontinued after hospital admission (no aneurysm occlusion attempted), and this cohort was excluded from analysis of the main statistical model. In the remaining n=1669 patients, the rate of in-hospital mortality was 13.9% (n=232). Strong independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were rebleeding (aOR, 7.69; 95% confidence interval, 3.00–19.71; P <0.001), cerebral infarction attributable to delayed cerebral ischemia (aOR, 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.94–6.89; P <0.001), intraventricular hemorrhage (aOR, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.38–5.09; P =0.003), and new infarction post-treatment (aOR, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.43–4.62; P =0.002). Conclusions—: Several—and among them modifiable—factors seem to be associated with in-hospital mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Our data suggest that strategies aiming to reduce the risk of rebleeding are most promising in patients where active treatment is initially pursued. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03245866.

17 January 2018 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MNMarian Christoph Neidert
Marian Christoph Neidert
NMNicolai Maldaner
Nicolai Maldaner
MSMartin Nikolaus Stienen
Martin Nikolaus Stienen
MRMichel Roethlisberger
Michel Roethlisberger
DZDaniel W Zumofen
Daniel W Zumofen
JBJan-Karl Burkhardt
Jan-Karl Burkhardt
The Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale is a novel quantitative scale measuring maximal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) thickness to predict delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). This scale could replace the Fisher score, which was traditionally used for DCI prediction. To validate the BNI scale. All patient data were obtained from the prospective aneurysmal SAH multicenter registry. In 1321 patients, demographic data, BNI scale, DCI, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score up to the 1-yr follow-up (1FU) were available for descriptive and univariate statistics. Outcome was dichotomized in favorable (mRS 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS 3-6). Odds ratios (OR) for DCI of Fisher 3 patients (n = 1115, 84%) compared to a control cohort of Fisher grade 1, 2, and 4 patients (n = 206, 16%) were calculated for each BNI grade separately. Overall, 409 patients (31%) developed DCI with a high DCI rate in the Fisher 3 cohort (34%). With regard to the BNI scale, DCI rates went up progressively from 26% (BNI 2) to 38% (BNI 5) and corresponding OR for DCI increased from 1.9 (1.0-3.5, 95% confidence interval) to 3.4 (2.1-5.3), respectively. BNI grade 5 patients had high rates of unfavorable outcome with 75% at discharge and 58% at 1FU. Likelihood for unfavorable outcome was high in BNI grade 5 patients with OR 5.9 (3.9-8.9) at discharge and OR 6.6 (4.1-10.5) at 1FU. This multicenter external validation analysis confirms that patients with a higher BNI grade show a significantly higher risk for DCI; high BNI grade was a predictor for unfavorable outcome at discharge and 1FU.

11 February 2019 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Frederic Michel LamothFrederic Michel Lamoth
Frederic Michel Lamoth
TMT Mercier
T Mercier
PAP André
P André
JPJ L Pagani
J L Pagani
OPO Pantet
O Pantet
LDLaurent Arthur Decosterd
Laurent Arthur Decosterd

1 August 2018 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLorenzo Giammattei
Lorenzo Giammattei
MMMahmoud Messerer
Mahmoud Messerer
ICIype Cherian
Iype Cherian
DSDaniele Starnoni
Daniele Starnoni
RMRodolfo Maduri
Rodolfo Maduri
RDRoy T. Daniel
Roy T. Daniel

1 October 2019 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDaniele Starnoni
Daniele Starnoni
RMRodolfo Maduri
Rodolfo Maduri
SHSteven David Hajdu
Steven David Hajdu
KPKatarzyna Pierzchala
Katarzyna Pierzchala
LGLorenzo Giammattei
Lorenzo Giammattei
RDRoy Thomas Daniel
Roy Thomas Daniel

1 July 2017 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNicolai Maldaner
Nicolai Maldaner
MSMartin N. Stienen
Martin N. Stienen
PBPhilippe Bijlenga
Philippe Bijlenga
DCDavide Croci
Davide Croci
DZDaniel W. Zumofen
Daniel W. Zumofen
JBJan-Karl Burkhardt
Jan-Karl Burkhardt