Sua Yoo

Dr. Sua Yoo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2006 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SYSua Yoo
Sua Yoo
FYFang-Fang Yin
Fang-Fang Yin

1 March 2010 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SYSua Yoo
Sua Yoo
QWQ. Jackie Wu
Q. Jackie Wu
WLW. Robert Lee
W. Robert Lee
FYFang-Fang Yin
Fang-Fang Yin

31 October 2006 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SYSua Yoo
Sua Yoo
GKGwe‐Ya Kim
Gwe‐Ya Kim
RHRabih Hammoud
Rabih Hammoud
EEEric Elder
Eric Elder
TPTodd Pawlicki
Todd Pawlicki
PMPeter Munro
Peter Munro

12 March 2025 in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ECEileen Cirino
Eileen Cirino
SBStanley H. Benedict
Stanley H. Benedict
PDPamela J. Dupre
Pamela J. Dupre
PHPer H. Halvorsen
Per H. Halvorsen
GKGrace Gwe‐Ya Kim
Grace Gwe‐Ya Kim
SYSua Yoo
Sua Yoo
The purpose of this Medical Physics Practice Guideline (MPPG) is to describe the minimum level of medical physics support deemed prudent for the practice of linear‐accelerator, photon‐based (linac) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) services. This report is an update of MPPG 9.a1 published in 2017. As SRS and SBRT services are rapidly adopted into the community‐practice setting, this guideline has been developed to build on the work presented in MPPG 9.a and provide current appropriate minimum practice guidelines for such services.

1 January 2009 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SYSua Yoo
Sua Yoo
QWQ. Jackie Wu
Q. Jackie Wu
DGDevon Godfrey
Devon Godfrey
HYHui Yan
Hui Yan
LRLei Ren
Lei Ren
FYFang-Fang Yin
Fang-Fang Yin

8 January 2015 in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYSua Yoo
Sua Yoo
RBRachel Blitzblau
Rachel Blitzblau
FYFang‐Fang Yin
Fang‐Fang Yin
JHJanet K. Horton
Janet K. Horton
The purpose of this study was to compare dosimetric parameters of treatment plans among four techniques for preoperative single‐fraction partial breast radiotherapy in order to select an optimal treatment technique. The techniques evaluated were noncoplanar 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT), noncoplanar intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (), coplanar IMRT (), and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The planning CT scans of 16 patients in the prone position were used in this study, with the single‐fraction prescription doses of 15 Gy for the first eight patients and 18 Gy for the remaining eight patients. Six (6) MV photon beams were designed to avoid the heart and contralateral breast. Optimization for IMRT and VMAT was performed to reduce the dose to the skin and normal breast. All plans were normalized such that 100% of the prescribed dose covered greater than 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV) consisting of gross tumor volume (GTV) plus 1.5 cm margin. Mean homogeneity index (HI) was the lowest () for 3D CRT and the highest () for VMAT. Mean conformity index (CI) was the lowest () for and the highest () for VMAT. Mean of the maximum point dose to skin was the lowest () for and the highest () for 3D CRT. showed very similar HI, CI, and maximum skin dose to (). The estimated mean treatment delivery time, excluding the time spent for patient positioning and imaging, was , and for and 3D CRT, respectively. In comparison of all four techniques for preoperative single‐fraction partial breast radiotherapy, we can conclude that noncoplanar or coplanar IMRT were optimal in this study as IMRT plans provided homogeneous and conformal target coverage, skin sparing, and relatively short treatment delivery time.PACS numbers: 81.40.Wx, 87.55.D‐