For a mobile agent with a time restriction to accomplish its mission, it is necessary for it to meet a deadline. However, in a distributed system there is the possibility of concurrency for the same resource. Treating such competition adequately is very important, especially in a real-time application scenario. In this article, we adopt an execution model in which mobile agents compete for the same resource in the same host. The goal of this paper is to propose a middleware extension that allows concurrent mobile agents to achieve their missions, providing a real-time scheduling mechanism in the JADE platform.

This study evaluates the accuracy of a low-cost wearable system for the continuous monitoring of vital signs, including heart rate, blood oxygen saturation (Sp${\mathrm{O}}_2$), blood pressure trend (BPT), and body temperature. The prototype was built using the nRF52840 microcontroller, which integrates photoplethysmography and infrared sensors. The heart rate and Sp${\mathrm{O}}_2$ data were collected under three body positions (Rest, Sitting, and Standing), while all measurements were performed using both anatomical configurations: BPT-Finger and BPT-Earlobe. Results were compared against validated commercial devices: UT-100 for heart rate and Sp${\mathrm{O}}_2$, G-TECH LA800 for blood pressure, and G-TECH THGTSC3 for body temperature. Ten participants were monitored over a ten-day period. Bland–Altman analysis revealed clinically acceptable agreement thresholds of ±5 mmHg for blood pressure, ±5–10 bpm for heart rate, ±4% for Sp${\mathrm{O}}_2$, and ±0.5 °C for temperature. Both wearable configurations demonstrated clinically acceptable agreement across all vital signs. The BPT-Earlobe configuration exhibited superior stability and lower variability in the Rest and Sitting positions, likely due to reduced motion artifacts. Conversely, the BPT-Finger configuration showed higher Sp${\mathrm{O}}_2$ accuracy in the Standing position, with narrower limits of agreement. These findings highlight the importance of sensor placement in maintaining measurement consistency across physiological conditions. With an estimated cost of only ~USD 130—compared to ~USD 590 for the commercial alternatives—the proposed system presents a cost-effective, scalable, and accessible solution for decentralized health monitoring, particularly in underserved or remote environments.