MicroRNAs (miRNAs) can regulate the expression of genes involved in the establishment of the window of implantation (WOI) in the endometrium. Recent studies indicated that cell-free miRNAs in uterine fluid and blood samples could act as alternative and non-invasive sample types for endometrial receptivity analysis. In this study, we attempt to systematically evaluate whether the expression levels of cell-free microRNAs in blood samples could be used as non-invasive biomarkers for assessing endometrial receptivity status. We profiled the miRNA expression levels of 111 blood samples using next-generation sequencing to establish a predictive model for the assessment of endometrial receptivity status. This model was validated with an independent dataset (n = 73). The overall accuracy is 95.9%. Specifically, we achieved accuracies of 95.9%, 95.9%, and 100.0% for the pre-receptive group, the receptive group, and the post-respective group, respectively. Additionally, we identified a set of differentially expressed miRNAs between different endometrial receptivity statuses using the following criteria: p-value < 0.05 and fold change greater than 1.5 or less than −1.5. In conclusion, the expression levels of cell-free miRNAs in blood samples can be utilized in a non-invasive manner to distinguish different endometrial receptivity statuses.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone tablet and continuous vaginal insert (Propess®) in low-risk nulliparous women at term with insufficient cervical ripening receiving elective induction. A retrospective study was conducted between March 2020 and February 2022 and included 230 women who underwent elective induction with dinoprostone tablet or vaginal insert. The primary endpoint was failure of induction. Secondary endpoints included time to vaginal delivery, vaginal delivery rate, as well as maternal and neonatal complications and adverse outcomes. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the main outcome measures; however, the high responders had a significant higher proportion of hyperstimulation and non-reassuring fetal status. The high responder in the Propess group was statistically significant younger (31.68 ± 4.73 vs. 33.82 ± 4.39, p = 0.027), while they had a significantly lower BMI at delivery time of the tablet group (24.49 ± 2.24 vs. 27.42 ± 4.32, p = 0.024). Factors associated with success of vaginal delivery within 24 h (p = 0.015, OR = 0.9, 95%CI = 0.82-0.98) and the Cesarean section (p < 0.001, OR = 1.17, 95%CI = 1.08-1.27) was BMI at delivery time. Slow-release vaginal insert and dinoprostone tablet had similar efficacy and safety for elective induction in low risk nulliparous women at term. Women with younger maternal age or lower BMI at delivery time may have a better response to dinoprostone and had a significantly higher proportion of hyperstimulation and non-reassuring fetal status.

Background/Objectives: This paper undertakes an investigation into the implications of premature progesterone rise (PPR) on pregnancy outcomes in freeze-all strategy cycles. Methods: A retrospective cohort study encompassing 675 IVF/ICSI cycles using a freeze-all strategy was enrolled. The cycles were categorized into two groups based on serum progesterone levels at the time of hCG administration: 526 cycles had levels below 1.5 ng/mL, while 149 cycles had levels equal to or above 1.5 ng/mL. Results: The findings revealed a significantly higher number of mature follicles and retrieved oocytes in patients with PPR across all AMH categories. Multiple analyses revealed factors influencing PPR, including the duration of induction and the number of retrieved oocytes. Within the same oocyte retrieval number group, patients with PPR demonstrated non-inferior pregnancy outcomes compared to non-PPR patients. Upon adjustment for age, AMH, and total follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dosage, PPR maintained a positive correlation with the cumulative live birth rate (LBR). Conclusions: The study showed that PPR correlates with an increase in retrieved oocytes while maintaining similar embryo quality and oocyte retrieval rates and results in a higher cumulative LBR.