Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent genetically inherited cardiomyopathy that follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. The majority of HCM cases can be attributed to mutation of the MYBPC3 gene, which encodes cMyBP-C, a crucial structural protein of the cardiac muscle. The manifestation of HCM’s morphological, histological, and clinical symptoms is subject to the complex interplay of various determinants, including genetic mutation and environmental factors. Approximately half of MYBPC3 mutations give rise to truncated protein products, while the remaining mutations cause insertion/deletion, frameshift, or missense mutations of single amino acids. In addition, the onset of HCM may be attributed to disturbances in the protein and transcript quality control systems, namely, the ubiquitin–proteasome system and nonsense-mediated RNA dysfunctions. The aforementioned genetic modifications, which appear to be associated with unfavorable lifelong outcomes and are largely influenced by the type of mutation, exhibit a unique array of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to arrhythmic syncope and even sudden cardiac death. Although the current understanding of the MYBPC3 mutation does not comprehensively explain the varied phenotypic manifestations witnessed in patients with HCM, patients with pathogenic MYBPC3 mutations can exhibit an array of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to advanced heart failure and sudden cardiac death, leading to a higher rate of adverse clinical outcomes. This review focuses on MYBPC3 mutation and its characteristics as a prognostic determinant for disease onset and related clinical consequences in HCM.

The presence of a myocardial infarction at a younger age is of special interest, considering the psychological and socioeconomic impact, as well as long-term morbidity and mortality. However, this group has a unique risk profile, with less traditional cardiovascular risk factors that are not well studied. This systematic review aims to evaluate traditional risk factors of myocardial infarction in the “young”, highlighting the clinical implications of lipoprotein (a). We performed a comprehensive search using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards; we systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Science Direct Scopus databases, using the terms: “myocardial infarction”, “young”, “lipoprotein (a)”, “low-density lipoprotein”, “risk factors”. The search identified 334 articles which were screened, and, at the end, 9 original research articles regarding the implications of lipoprotein (a) in myocardial infarction in the “young” were included in the qualitative synthesis. Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels were independently associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease, especially in young patients, where this risk increased by threefold. Thus, it is recommended to measure the lipoprotein (a) levels in individuals with suspected familial hypercholesterolaemia or with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and no other identifiable risk factors, in order to identify patients who might benefit from a more intensive therapeutic approach and follow-up.

Kounis syndrome (KS) is a rare condition where hypersensitivity reactions trigger coronary vasospasm, destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques, or stent thrombosis, posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its overlap with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the absence of specific guidelines. This study reviews cases of KS from the Institute of Cardiovascular Disease to highlight clinical presentations, triggers, and treatment strategies. We analyzed four cases of KS treated at our institution between 2019 and 2024. Detailed clinical histories, laboratory findings, imaging studies, and treatment plans were reviewed. Patients were classified by KS subtype based on coronary anatomy and pathophysiological mechanisms. Management strategies were tailored to each subtype, combining myocardial revascularization, antiplatelet therapy, and treatment for allergic reactions. The series included two cases of Type I KS in patients with structurally normal coronary arteries and two cases of Type II KS involving pre-existing atherosclerosis. No Type III KS was observed. Triggers included insect stings, antibiotics, iodinated contrast agents, and anesthetics. Coronary angiography confirmed the diagnosis in all cases. Treatments included percutaneous coronary interventions, dual antiplatelet therapy, and prophylactic antihistamines or corticosteroids. All patients experienced favorable outcomes, although diagnostic delays were noted in cases with atypical presentations. KS remains underdiagnosed, especially in emergency settings where it mimics ACS. Early recognition and multidisciplinary management involving allergology and cardiology are crucial. Future research should focus on safer diagnostic tools, understanding the pathophysiology, and developing evidence-based preventive strategies. Increasing the awareness of KS and its inclusion in ACS differentials are essential to improving patient outcomes and preventing recurrences.

Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens are increasingly common and pose serious treatment challenges due to limited antibiotic options and high complication rates. Identifying patients at risk is essential for guiding empirical therapy and improving outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with carbapenem-resistant (CR) UTIs by comparing them with carbapenem-susceptible (CS) UTIs. Secondary objectives included analyzing the types of microorganisms involved in both groups, their antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and the presence of carbapenemase enzymes among CR UTI cases. Method: We conducted a retrospective case-control study involving 127 hospitalized patients with UTIs caused by CR microorganisms and 91 patients with UTIs caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains that retain susceptibility to carbapenems, admitted between 1 October 2023, and 31 March 2025. Results: In univariate analysis, CR UTI patients had significantly higher rates of neoplasia, neurological disorders, urosepsis at admission, septic shock, the presence of urinary catheters at diagnosis, permanent nephrostomy catheters, hospitalizations within the past 180 days, previous antibiotic exposure including carbapenems, and recent urological procedures. Multivariate analysis revealed four independent risk factors for CR UTIs: neoplasia (OR = 2.152; 95% CI: 1.044–4.436; p = 0.038), neurological disorders (OR = 7.427; 95% CI: 2.804–19.674; p < 0.0001), antibiotic use in the previous 180 days (OR = 2.792; 95% CI: 1.487–5.396; p = 0.001), and prior carbapenem treatment OR = 10.313; 95% CI: 1.277–83.248; p = 0.029). Most of the isolated organisms belonged to the Enterobacterales genus, with Klebsiella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa being the most common pathogens in CR UTIs, accounting for over 90% of cases. Among patients tested for carbapenemase production, all but one tested positive for at least one carbapenemase. Conclusions: Neoplasia, neurological disorders, recent antibiotic therapy, and prior carbapenem use were significantly associated with increased risk of developing CR UTIs. Klebsiella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the predominant causative organisms, with New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) being the most frequently identified resistance mechanisms.

Background and Objectives: Double-J stents are urinary catheters that are frequently used in urology. They are now also used in other specialist areas such as obstetrics and gynecology. However, the use of double-J stents is not without side effects. The aim of this review was to highlight the indications and possible adverse effects of the use of these stents in obstetrics and gynecology. Materials and Methods: We analyzed works published after 1995 in the PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases related to the use of double-J stents in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as reported adverse events. We carried out a narrative review of the available literature on this topic. Results: We identified 69 relevant publications that we included in the review. In obstetrics, indications include the treatment of gestational hydronephrosis, some urological conditions during pregnancy, such as obstructive urinary calculi, with or without superinfection, or intraoperative use for cesarean section or hysterectomy after cesarean section, to protect from, or to solve, ureteral lesions. In gynecology, they are used preoperatively or intraoperatively to protect the ureter during gynecological operations in the pelvic area or postoperatively to repair some ureteral injuries. They are also indicated for ureteral obstructions that occur after pelvic radiotherapy for gynecological neoplasms. Complications associated with the use of double-J stents include more frequent urinary tract infections, lower urinary tract symptoms, calcifications and misplacements. Conclusions: Double-J stents are widely used in obstetrics and gynecology and are characterized by good efficiency and safety, although some side effects may occur (lower urinary tract symptoms, hematuria, complications in birth outcomes), which do not limit their use. Summary of evidence: In this review, we analyzed the indications and complications of double-J ureteral stenting in obstetric and gynecologic patients. We found that the procedure is safe, both in the treatment of ureteral obstruction and in the resolution of postoperative complications. No serious complications of ureteral stenting have been noted that would constitute a contraindication to its use. Future prospective studies in large patient cohorts are necessary to validate our data.

Background/Objectives: This study assessed the long-term prognostic implications of newly developed left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and a single coronary lesion, following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Among 3526 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction between January 2011 and December 2013, 42 were identified with STEMI, a single coronary lesion, and newly diagnosed LBBB. A control group of 42 randomly selected STEMI patients without LBBB was also included. All participants were prospectively evaluated with a median follow-up duration of 9.4 years. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed to assess the impact of LBBB on long-term outcomes. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The STEMI with new LBBB group had significantly higher rates of new myocardial infarction, revascularization, and mortality, highlighting the severe prognostic implications and elevated risk for adverse outcomes compared to STEMI without LBBB. The multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of LBBB (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.28–3.62, p = 0.003), lower LVEF (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.22–1.72, p < 0.001), and longer pain-to-admission time (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09–1.61, p = 0.008) were significant independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Newly acquired LBBB in STEMI patients is associated with poorer long-term outcomes. Early identification and management of factors such as reduced LVEF and timely hospital admission, specifically in patients with new-onset LBBB, can improve prognosis.