Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), comprising Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with still-elusive etiopathogeneses and an increasing prevalence worldwide. Despite the growing availability of more advanced therapies in the last two decades, there are still a number of unmet needs. For example, the achievement of mucosal healing has been widely demonstrated as a prognostic marker for better outcomes and a reduced risk of dysplasia and cancer; however, the accuracy of endoscopy is crucial for both this aim and the precise and reproducible evaluation of endoscopic activity and the detection of dysplasia. Artificial intelligence (AI) has drastically altered the field of GI studies and is being extensively applied to medical imaging. The utilization of deep learning and pattern recognition can help the operator optimize image classification and lesion segmentation, detect early mucosal abnormalities, and eventually reveal and uncover novel biomarkers with biologic and prognostic value. The role of AI in endoscopy—and potentially also in histology and imaging in the context of IBD—is still at its initial stages but shows promising characteristics that could lead to a better understanding of the complexity and heterogeneity of IBDs, with potential improvements in patient care and outcomes. The initial experience with AI in IBDs has shown its potential value in the differentiation of UC and CD when there is no ileal involvement, reducing the significant amount of time it takes to review videos of capsule endoscopy and improving the inter- and intra-observer variability in endoscopy reports and scoring. In addition, these initial experiences revealed the ability to predict the histologic score index and the presence of dysplasia. Thus, the purpose of this review was to summarize recent advances regarding the application of AI in IBD endoscopy as there is, indeed, increasing evidence suggesting that the integration of AI-based clinical tools will play a crucial role in paving the road to precision medicine in IBDs.

Background/Objectives: Despite the increasing number of available medications, a significant proportion of IBD patients fail to achieve the current therapeutic targets. Uncontrolled IBD has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life and on overall costs for the healthcare system. Given the complex pathophysiology of IBD, Combined Advanced Targeted Therapy (CATT), involving the combination of biologics/small molecules, appears to have biological plausibility and is gaining increasing interest. The aim of this narrative review is to provide the current evidence regarding CATT in IBD and propose future developments in this field. Methods: Relevant literature evidence was searched with pertinent MeSH terms in the most important database. Results: Available evidence of CATT in IBD provides encouraging results in terms of efficacy and effectiveness, with an acceptable safety profile. CATT may represent a therapeutic solution for patients with “difficult-to-treat” IBD or with concomitant immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. However, current data are restricted by an overall low level of evidence and by the short follow-up. Conclusions: There are no data concluding the superiority of one combination therapy over another. Various therapeutic schemes could be applied in the near future. Further studies are needed to provide recommendations and integrate this therapeutic strategy into everyday clinical practice.

Introduction: High-quality colonoscopy is influenced by several factors, with the adenoma detection rate (ADR) being one of the most studied indicators. A strong inverse relationship exists between ADR and the risk of developing post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC), prompting the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines to recommend a minimum ADR of 25%. In contrast, there is limited evidence supporting the clinical significance of the serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR), and no specific benchmark was established until a very recent update from the American societies. Main paper: This review examines the factors that influence ADR and SPDR, offering tips to improve these metrics. Effective interventions for enhancing ADR include training, colonoscopy feedback, adequate bowel preparation, longer withdrawal time, water-aided colonoscopy, right colon second look, and chromoendoscopy. The use of cap, devices, and specialized scopes also show promise, though these are often at higher costs. Artificial intelligence has generated great optimism, especially following positive results from early randomized controlled trials; however, its effectiveness has been less pronounced in real-world settings. Conclusions: Many of these approaches require further trials and meta-analyses to establish their ultimate efficacy. Moreover, future clinical head-to-head studies will help to identify the most effective interventions for reducing colorectal cancer incidence and the risk of PCCRC.

Background/Objectives: Upper gastrointestinal Crohn’s disease (UGI-CD) is inconsistently defined and often underrecognized, obscuring epidemiology, complicating diagnosis, and delaying tailored care. The absence of a unified, operational definition with segment-specific criteria hinders reproducibility and comparability across studies. Methods: We performed a narrative synthesis of adult and pediatric studies and major guidelines, examining definitions, prevalence, diagnosis, and management. Where possible, findings were mapped to upper GI segments (esophagus, stomach, duodenum, proximal small bowel). Results: Definitions of UGI-CD are heterogeneous. Prevalence varies widely and rises with systematic foregut assessment; isolated upper GI disease without ileocolonic involvement is rare. Diagnosis relies on esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies, complemented by cross-sectional imaging and enteroscopy. Management should extend beyond standard ileocolonoscopy, with segment-tailored monitoring. Anti-TNF agents show the most consistent efficacy in esophagogastroduodenal disease, whereas benefits are attenuated in proximal small bowel involvement. For stricturing disease, endoscopic balloon dilation is suitable for short, non-penetrating strictures but often requires repetition; surgery is preferred for complex anatomy or failed dilation. A short summary of the article’s main findings is provided. Conclusions: UGI-CD remains poorly standardized across definition, epidemiology, and management. We propose a pragmatic diagnostic and monitoring pathway and highlight priorities for research: segment-based reporting, inclusion of upper GI-only cohorts, and validation of treatment targets aligned with treat-to-target care—steps essential to improve early recognition and patient outcomes.

Background: The rising prevalence of gastric, biliary, and pancreatic surgeries has led to an increasing population of patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA). In this setting, conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often limited by anatomical barriers, resulting in high rates of technical failure and complications. While device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has expanded therapeutic possibilities, its efficacy remains modest in complex reconstructions. Methods: This review analyzed recent literature from PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to April 2025, focusing on diagnostic and therapeutic roles of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in SAA. Particular attention was given to cases where standard endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical techniques failed and to studies comparing EUS-guided approaches with alternative modalities. Results: EUS has transitioned from a primarily diagnostic modality to a versatile therapeutic platform in SAA. Techniques such as EUS-guided rendezvous, antegrade drainage, and hepaticogastrostomy have shown technical and clinical success rates exceeding 80–90%, often comparable or superior to interventional radiology, while reducing the need for external drains. Innovative procedures, including EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) and EUS-directed enteroenteric bypass (EDEE), have transformed the management of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and bilioenteric anastomoses, providing durable and reusable access for repeated interventions. Despite these advances, EUS-guided interventions remain technically demanding, requiring advanced endoscopic and radiologic skills, specialized devices, and are best performed in tertiary referral centers. Conclusions: EUS has redefined the treatment paradigm of biliopancreatic diseases in patients with SAA, increasingly emerging as the preferred minimally invasive approach when conventional techniques fail. Future developments will focus on dedicated devices, standardized guidelines, and structured training programs to optimize outcomes. Multidisciplinary collaboration and centralization in high-volume centers remain essential to ensure safety, efficacy, and reproducibility.