Chandani Nekitsing

Chandani Nekitsing

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2018 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CNChandani Nekitsing
Chandani Nekitsing
PBPam Blundell-Birtill
Pam Blundell-Birtill
JCJennie E. Cockroft
Jennie E. Cockroft
MHMarion Hetherington
Marion Hetherington
Most children do not meet daily recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake, and consumption of vegetables remains especially low. Eating habits track from childhood to adulthood hence establishing liking and intake of vegetables is important. To identify the most successful strategies to enhance vegetable intake in preschool children aged 2-5 years. The research was a systematic review and a meta-analysis of published studies. A comprehensive search strategy was performed using key databases such as Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, EBSCO and CENTRAL. Articles published between 2005-January 2016, specifically with measured vegetable consumption were included. 30 articles and 44 intervention arms were identified for inclusion (n = 4017). Nine dominant intervention strategies emerged to promote vegetable intake in preschool children. These included; choice, pairing (stealth), education, food service, modelling, reward, taste exposure, variety and visual presentation. The meta-analysis revealed that interventions implementing repeated taste exposure had better pooled effects than those which did not. Intake increased with number of taste exposures and intake was greater when vegetables offered were in their plain form rather than paired with a flavor, dip or added energy (e.g. oil). Moreover, intake of vegetables which were unfamiliar/disliked increased more than those which were familiar/liked. Repeated taste exposure is a simple technique that could be implemented in childcare settings and at home by parents. Health policy could specifically target the use of novel and disliked vegetables in childcare settings with emphasis on a minimum 8-10 exposures. The systematic review protocol was registered on the PROSPERO (number: CRD42016033984).

14 February 2018 in Current Obesity Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNChandani Nekitsing
Chandani Nekitsing
MHMarion Hetherington
Marion Hetherington
PBPam Blundell-Birtill
Pam Blundell-Birtill
Purpose of Review The present review was undertaken in order to summarize and evaluate recent research investigating taste exposure, sensory learning, and nutrition education interventions for promoting vegetable intake in preschool children. Recent Findings Overall, taste exposure interventions yielded the best outcomes for increasing vegetable intake in early childhood. Evidence from sensory learning strategies such as visual exposure and experiential learning also show some success. While nutrition education remains the most common approach used in preschool settings, additional elements are needed to strengthen the educational program for increasing vegetable intake. There is a substantial gap in the evidence base to promote vegetable intake in food fussy children. Summary The present review reveals the relative importance of different intervention strategies for promoting vegetable intake. To strengthen intervention effects for improving vegetable intake in preschool children, future research could consider integrating taste exposure and sensory learning strategies with nutrition education within the preschool curriculum.

1 June 2018 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EKEmma Krop
Emma Krop
MHMarion Hetherington
Marion Hetherington
CNChandani Nekitsing
Chandani Nekitsing
SMSophie Miquel
Sophie Miquel
LPLuminita Postelnicu
Luminita Postelnicu
ASAnwesha Sarkar
Anwesha Sarkar
Food delivers energy, nutrients and a pleasurable experience. Slow eating and prolonged oro-sensory exposure to food during consumption can enhance the processes that promote satiation. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of oral processing on subjective measures of appetite (hunger, desire to eat) and objectively measured food intake. The aim was to investigate the influence of oral processing characteristics, specifically "chewing" and "lubrication", on "appetite" and "food intake". A literature search of six databases (Cochrane library, PubMed, Medline, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus), yielded 12161 articles which were reduced to a set of 40 articles using pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. A further two articles were excluded from the meta-analysis due to missing relevant data. From the remaining 38 papers, detailing 40 unique studies with 70 subgroups, raw data were extracted for meta-analysis (food intake n = 65, hunger n = 22 and desire to eat ratings n = 15) and analyzed using random effects modelling. Oral processing parameters, such as number of chews, eating rate and texture manipulation, appeared to influence food intake markedly but appetite ratings to a lesser extent. Meta-analysis confirmed a significant effect of the direct and indirect aspects of oral processing that were related to chewing on both self-reported hunger (-0.20 effect size, 95% confidence interval CI: -0.30, -0.11), and food intake (-0.28 effect size, 95% CI: -0.36, -0.19). Although lubrication is an important aspect of oral processing, few studies on its effects on appetite have been conducted. Future experiments using standardized approaches should provide a clearer understanding of the role of oral processing, including both chewing and lubrication, in promoting satiety.

1 December 2019 in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CNChandani Nekitsing
Chandani Nekitsing
PBPam Blundell-Birtill
Pam Blundell-Birtill
JCJennie E. Cockroft
Jennie E. Cockroft
AFAlison Fildes
Alison Fildes
MHMarion Hetherington
Marion Hetherington
Most children eat fewer vegetables than recommended. Storybooks and sensory play may increase vegetable intake. This study tested the effects on intake of learning about an unfamiliar vegetable (celeriac) through storybooks and sensory play. It was predicted that an illustrated, congruent storybook would increase intake of celeriac compared to an incongruent storybook (carrot); and that adding congruent sensory play with celeriac to the storybook would produce a synergistic effect on intake of celeriac. Children from 12 UK preschools were randomly assigned by clusters to four intervention conditions using a 2×2 factorial design. The factors were vegetable congruency (sensory play and/or storybook were congruent, or incongruent [carrot] with celeriac) and intervention type (storybook only or storybook combined with sensory play). Three hundred and thirty-seven children aged 2 to 5 years were recruited to take part in November 2017. Over a 2-week period, children in all four conditions were read a vegetable storybook featuring celeriac or carrot. In addition, two conditions received sensory play with either carrot or celeriac added to the storybook method. Intake of the unfamiliar vegetable (celeriac) was measured at baseline and after the 2-week intervention. Complex samples logistic regression and general linear modeling were performed to examine group differences at post-intervention. Children receiving the congruent (celeriac) storybook had higher odds of eating celeriac compared to children who received the incongruent (carrot) storybook. Receiving congruent sensory play increased the odds of eating celeriac, whereas receiving incongruent sensory play did not. From the 267 children who completed both baseline and post-intervention assessments, 85 ate no celeriac at baseline and were classed as non-eaters. Sensory play (congruent or incongruent) increased the odds of eating some celeriac in non-eaters compared to storybook only conditions. Congruency between storybook and vegetable increased intake; sensory play with celeriac increased the likelihood of eating celeriac. Storybooks and sensory play are simple interventions to increase willingness to try an unfamiliar vegetable.

12 February 2022 in Current Nutrition Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNChandani Nekitsing
Chandani Nekitsing
MHMarion Hetherington
Marion Hetherington
Purpose of Review: To provide a rationale for promoting a vegetables first approach to complementary feeding (CF), building on prior exposure to vegetable flavours experienced in utero and via breastfeeding (chemosensory continuity). Recent Findings: Vegetables confer selective health benefits but population intakes are below recommendations globally; maternal intake of vegetables during both pregnancy and lactation promotes familiarity with some vegetable flavours. Building on this exposure, vegetables as a first food during CF further promote acceptance. However, experiments testing efficacy of a vegetables first approach to CF demonstrate increased liking and intake, some evidence of generalisability but little evidence of sustained effects beyond infancy. Summary: The aim to increase the quantity and variety of vegetables eaten by children is both desirable, to improve nutrient quality of the diet, and achievable. However, longer, larger, randomised control trials are needed to evidence any longer term, sustainable benefits to liking and intake of vegetables.

30 April 2021 in PsyArXiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
CNChandani Nekitsing
Chandani Nekitsing
PBPam Blundell-Birtill
Pam Blundell-Birtill
MHMarion Hetherington
Marion Hetherington
This study explored strategies implemented by parents to encourage their children to eat vegetables, especially when children exhibit fussy eating. The study involved a mixed methods approach using semi-structured interviews with twenty parents of preschool children (aged 2-5 years) with a high and low level of food fussiness (established by questionnaire). All interviews were audio recorded, then verbatim transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Thematic analysis revealed seven main themes with sixteen subthemes encompassing various vegetable promoting strategies. These included (1) Instructed knowledge, (2) Experiential learning, (3) Food manipulation, (4) Reinforcement, (5) Encouragement of autonomy (6) Commitment to a food ideal and (7) Inherent values. Parents used a range of methods to encourage their children to eat vegetables but there were no major differences by level of food fussiness. Parents talked about variable success in applying strategies even with the same child. Home based strategies were more diverse and personalized to the child than those tested in most research studies. Therefore, interventions to promote vegetable intake in preschool children will benefit from co-production with parents adopting a tailored approach to match the needs of the specific child.