Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to health systems, and has significantly affected the healthcare of lung cancer patients. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on early lung cancer patients’ surgical treatment. Methods: All consecutive patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer eligible for surgical treatment stage I/II and resectable stage III, referred to our department during the first wave of COVID-19 between February to May 2020, were included and compared with those on the exact corresponding quarter in 2019, one year before the pandemic. Waiting time to surgical treatment, increase of tumor’s size and increase on lung cancer stage were recorded and compared. All subjects were followed up for 12 months. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were applied to assess the differences in the management of the studied groups adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Sixty-one patients with early-stage lung cancer were included in the study; 28 (median age 67 years, SD: 7.1) during the pandemic and 33 (median age 67.1 years, SD: 7.5) one year earlier. A significantly longer period of waiting for treatment and an increase in tumor size were observed during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic [median time 47 days, interquartile rate (IQR): 23–100] vs. [median time 18 days, IQR: 11–23], p < 0.001. No significant differences were detected in the increase of the stage of lung cancer between the subgroups. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on surgical and oncological care, leading to significant delays on treatment and an increase in tumor size in early-stage lung cancer patients.

Introduction: Flexible bronchoscopy and its new methods have revolutionized the era of the diagnosis, staging, and restaging of lung cancer. A rare late complication is post-bronchoscopy respiratory infection, but it is critical due to treatment delays, treatment cancellation, and death. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for respiratory tract infection after bronchoscopy in patients with lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective single-center observational study of 182 hospitalized patients was conducted at U.G.H. “ATTIKON” who underwent bronchoscopy for diagnosis/staging/restaging of lung cancer from January 2022 to April 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they developed post-bronchoscopy respiratory infection. Results: Analyzing the data between the groups, several potential risk factors for infection were identified, including recent hospitalization for COVID-19 within the last month (OR: 6.16; p = 0.01), history of COPD (OR: 8; p = 0.03), presence of emphysema on CT scan (OR: 8; p = 0.03), endobronchial lesions causing ≥ 50% bronchial obstruction with inability to advance the bronchoscope (OR: 9.6; p < 0.01), increased white blood cell count (≥8.5 K/μL) before bronchoscopy (OR: 8; p = 0.03), and advanced stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (OR: 9.67; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Comparing our results with previous studies on risk factors for respiratory infections after bronchoscopy, we found that recent hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection was a unique finding in our study. With the increasing incidence of lung cancer worldwide and the critical role of bronchoscopy in diagnosis/staging/restaging, large multicenter studies are needed to identify these risk factors and develop strategies for early detection, treatment, and prevention.

Medical thoracoscopy/pleuroscopy has become, after bronchoscopy, the second most commonly utilized endoscopic procedure in interventional pulmonology. Due to their common origin, medical thoracoscopy/pleuroscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are quite similar procedures technically. In contrast to the prevailing attitude that it should predominantly be performed by interventional pulmonologists, we believe that, like all hybrid-in-nature techniques, it should be implemented as part of a combined specialist care service/team. Herewith, we describe our attempt to establish a multidisciplinary pleural disease program during a difficult economic period for our country, comprising thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists and anesthesiologists, all of whom brought in their experience, expertise and resources to establish and develop the service resulting in a hybridization of the technique, with, as reported, quite favorable results.

Background: Immunocompromised patients, particularly those with humoral immune deficiencies or receiving B-cell-targeted therapies, are at increased risk of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, a condition often underrecognized and lacking standardized treatment. Methods: We present a case series of patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and underlying humoral immunodeficiency, treated at the General University Hospital “Attikon” from February 2023 to September 2024. Persistent infection was defined by prolonged symptoms, compatible imaging findings, and RT-PCR positivity beyond 21 days. All patients received combination antiviral therapy with remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), using a structured diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. Results: Eleven patients (55% male), median age 56 [IQR 50–66] years, were included. Seven (64%) had hematologic malignancy, 10 (91%) received anti-CD20 therapy, and 6 (55%) had both. Median symptom duration before diagnosis was 63 [58–135] days. Ten (91%) experienced recurrent symptoms; one (9%) had progressive symptoms with severe respiratory failure requiring high-flow nasal cannula. Persistent infection was confirmed via bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage in 6 patients (55%). Prior to diagnosis, 5 patients (45%) required one hospitalization, 1 (9%) was hospitalized twice, and 2 (18%) had more than two hospitalizations. Following combination therapy, 10 (91%) achieved complete response at 180-day follow-up. Conclusions: The proposed diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm combining remdesivir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and IVIG enhanced diagnostic value and therapeutic outcomes in this high-risk population.