In addition to the myotendinous junctions, muscle fibers also are connected to the extracellular matrix along their full peripheral length. Moreover, within the in vivo context, muscle is not an isolated entity. Instead, myofascial tissues connect muscles mechanically to neighboring muscular and nonmuscular structures, epimuscularly. This paper reviews the key aspects, determinants, and effects of epimuscular myofascial force transmission on muscular mechanics.

Purpose Mechanical interactions between muscles have been shown for in situ conditions. In vivo data for humans is unavailable. Global and local length changes of calf muscles were studied to test the hypothesis that local strains may occur also within muscle for which global strain equals zero. Methods For determination of globally induced strain in m. gastrocnemius in dissected human cadavers several knee joint angles were imposed, while keeping ankle joint angle constant and measuring its muscle–tendon complex length changes. In vivo local strains in both gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were calculated using MRI techniques in healthy human volunteers comparing images taken at static knee angles of 173° and 150°. Results Imposed global strains on gastrocnemius were much smaller than local strains. High distributions of strains were encountered, e.g. overall lengthened muscle contains locally lengthened, as well as shortened areas within it. Substantial strains were not limited to gastrocnemius, but were found also in synergistic soleus muscle, despite the latter muscle–tendon complex length remaining isometric (constant ankle angle: i.e. global strain = 0), as it does not cross the knee. Based on results of animal experiments this effect is ascribed to myofascial connections between these synergistic muscles. The most likely pathway is the neurovascular tract within the anterior crural compartment (i.e. the collagen reinforcements of blood vessels, lymphatics and nerves). However, direct intermuscular transmission of force may also occur via the perimysium shared between the two muscles. Conclusions Global strains imposed on muscle (joint movement) are not good estimators of in vivo local strains within it: differing in magnitude, as well as direction of length change. Substantial mechanical interaction occurs between calf muscles, which is mediated by myofascial force transmission between these synergistic muscles. This confirms conclusions of previous in situ studies in experimental animals and human patients, for in vivo conditions in healthy human subjects.

Certain recent studies showed that extra-muscular myofascial force transmission affects the length-force characteristics of rat extensor digitorium longus (EDL) muscle significantly after distal or proximal lengthening. This suggested that the relative position of a muscle with respect to its surrounding connective tissues is a co-determinant of muscle force in addition to muscle length, and indicated major effects on muscular mechanics. The specific goal of the present study is to investigate such effects by studying: (1) distributions of lengths of sarcomeres within muscle fibres and (2) the relative contributions of muscle fibres and the extra-cellular matrix to muscle total force, using a finite element model. The length of the muscle modelled was kept constant at a high and at a low muscle length whereas the relative position of the muscle was altered exclusively. For both muscle lengths, the forces exerted at distal and proximal tendons were unequal at almost all muscle relative positions. The proximo-distal force difference was enhanced as the muscle was repositioned away from its reference position. This confirmed the role of relative position of a muscle as a co-determinant of muscle force. At higher muscle lengths, distributions of lengths of sarcomeres arranged in series within muscle fibres were substantial. The force transmitted by the muscles' extra-cellular matrix comprised a sizable part of muscle total force. At lower muscle lengths distribution of sarcomere lengths was relatively limited indicating that the extra-cellular matrix is bearing the extra-muscular force. However, minor sarcomere length changes were shown to accumulate to sizable effects on the summed forces exerted by the muscle fibres. In addition, the extra-muscular load was shown to manipulate the force exerted by the extra-cellular matrix. We conclude that the relative position of a muscle has substantial effects on intra-muscular mechanics and the importance of the role of the extra-cellular matrix in determining the proximo-distal force differences is comparable to that of the intra-cellular domain.