We evaluated the antibody responses in 259 potential convalescent plasma donors for Covid-19 patients. Different assays were used: a commercial ELISA detecting antibodies against the recombinant spike protein (S1); a multiplex assay detecting total and specific antibody isotypes against three SARS-CoV-2 antigens (S1, basic nucleocapsid (N) protein and receptor-binding domain (RBD)); and an in-house ELISA detecting antibodies to complete spike, RBD and N in 60 of these donors. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were also evaluated in these 60 donors. Analyzed samples were collected at a median time of 62 (14–104) days from the day of first symptoms or positive PCR (for asymptomatic patients). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 88% and 87.8% of donors using the ELISA and the multiplex assay, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that age ≥50 years (p < 0.001) and need for hospitalization (p < 0.001) correlated with higher antibody titers, while asymptomatic status (p < 0.001) and testing >60 days after symptom onset (p = 0.001) correlated with lower titers. Interestingly, pseudotype virus-neutralizing antibodies (PsNAbs) significantly correlated with spike and with RBD antibodies by ELISA. Sera with high PsNAb also showed a strong ability to neutralize active SARS-CoV-2 virus, with hospitalized patients showing higher titers. Therefore, convalescent plasma donors can be selected based on the presence of high RBD antibody titers.

COVID-19 is a global pandemic associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Convalescent plasma (CP) infusion is a strategy of potential therapeutic benefit. We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CP in patients with COVID-19, grade 4 or higher. To evaluate the efficacy of CP, a matched propensity score analysis was used comparing the intervention (n = 59) to a control group (n = 59). Sixty patients received CP within a median time of 7 days from symptom onset. During a median follow-up of 28.5 days, 56/60 patients fully recovered and 1 patient remained in the ICU. The death rate in the CP group was 3.4% vs. 13.6% in the control group. By multivariate analysis, CP recipients demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of death [HR: 0.04 (95% CI: 0.004–0.36), p: 0.005], significantly better overall survival by Kaplan–Meir analysis (p < 0.001), and increased probability of extubation [OR: 30.3 (95% CI: 2.64–348.9), p: 0.006]. Higher levels of antibodies in the CP were independently associated with significantly reduced risk of death. CP infusion was safe with only one grade 3 adverse event (AE), which easily resolved. CP used early may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with severe COVID-19 (trial number NCT04408209).

COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic with high morbidity and mortality. Despite meticulous research, only dexamethasone has shown consistent mortality reduction. Convalescent plasma (CP) infusion might also develop into a safe and effective treatment modality on the basis of recent studies and meta-analyses; however, little is known regarding the kinetics of antibodies in CP recipients. To evaluate the kinetics, we followed 31 CP recipients longitudinally enrolled at a median of 3 days post symptom onset for changes in binding and neutralizing antibody titers and viral loads. Antibodies against the complete trimeric Spike protein and the receptor-binding domain (Spike-RBD), as well as against the complete Nucleocapsid protein and the RNA binding domain (N-RBD) were determined at baseline and weekly following CP infusion. Neutralizing antibody (pseudotype NAb) titers were determined at the same time points. Viral loads were determined semi-quantitatively by SARS-CoV-2 PCR. Patients with low humoral responses at entry showed a robust increase of antibodies to all SARS-CoV-2 proteins and Nab, reaching peak levels within 2 weeks. The rapid increase in binding and neutralizing antibodies was paralleled by a concomitant clearance of the virus within the same timeframe. Patients with high humoral responses at entry demonstrated low or no further increases; however, virus clearance followed the same trajectory as in patients with low antibody response at baseline. Together, the sequential immunological and virological analysis of this well-defined cohort of patients early in infection shows the presence of high levels of binding and neutralizing antibodies and potent clearance of the virus.

Summary: Luspatercept has been approved for the treatment of anaemia in transfusion‐dependent (TD) patients with lower risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after erythroid‐stimulated agent (ESA) failure, according to the results of the MEDALIST trial. In this multicentre retrospective study, we report efficacy and safety data of luspatercept administered in 98 TD LR‐MDS patients after ESA failure. The percentage of patients that stopped luspatercept due to adverse events was comparable to that reported in the MEDALIST study. Furthermore, we observed that 44.3% patients who had completed 24 weeks of follow‐up achieved transfusion independence lasting longer than 8 weeks, compared to 38% in the MEDALIST trial. These positive results may be attributed to the inclusion of patients with lower transfusion needs in our study. All responses were observed within 8 months since luspatercept onset and many were long‐lasting, even in the high‐transfusion burden patient group. In addition, response to luspatercept and the presence of less than two mutations independently predicted for longer overall survival. Overall, our results confirm luspatercept's safety and efficacy in TD LR‐MDS patients who have experienced ESA failure in a real‐world setting.

Background: The landscape of first-line treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy has changed remarkably after venetoclax approval. Accumulating real-world data further apprises us with more knowledgeable use. To assess the efficacy and safety challenges in the real-life setting of the combination of hypomethylated agent (HMA) and venetoclax, we conducted a multi-center retrospective study. Methods: Forty adult AML patients treated with the combination of HMA and venetoclax as a first-line treatment after full approval (2020) were included. To confirm VIALE-A results, this group was compared to a historical cohort of 17 chemotherapy-ineligible AML patients treated with HMA monotherapy before 2020. Results: The combination of HMA-venetoclax achieved a composite complete response rate of 86.8% (p < 0.001), median overall survival, and event-free survival of 33.8 and 19.7 months, respectively, in a median follow-up of 17.8 months (p_os < 0.001, HR = 0.276, CI: 0.132–0.575, p_EFS = 0.004, HR = 0.367, CI: 0.174–0.773). High rates of neutropenia (90%) and consequent infection rates (57.5%) were noted. Only 55% of our patients received antifungal prophylaxis, as its use remains controversial, and invasive fungal infections were presented in 7.5%. Conclusions: Evidently, venetoclax-HMA yields high response rates and profound survival benefits in real life and has changed our approach to alternative chemotherapy options.

Background-Objectives: Although considered standard of care for patients with low-/intermediate-1 risk MDS and isolated del(5q), lenalidomide is not widely used in patients exhibiting additional cytogenetic abnormalities, on top of del(5)q. The aim of this study was to provide real-world evidence for the efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with del(5q), with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Methods: Patients with MDS exhibiting del(5q) in the Greek National Myelodysplastic Syndromes Registry were analyzed if they had received at least one lenalidomide dose and detailed response assessment/follow-up was available. Results: Among 238 patients analyzed, 153 (64.3%) had del(5q) syndrome (Group-I), 34 (14.3%) had an isolated del(5q) abnormality but were not 5q− syndrome (Group-II), 26 (10.9%) had del(5q) plus only one additional cytogenetic abnormality (Group-III), and 25 (10.5%) had del(5q) plus >1 additional abnormality (Group-IV). Among 218 (91.6%) evaluable patients, a major response was achieved by 146 (67.0%) patients, 114/146 (78.1%) in Group-I, 18/31 (58.1%) in Group-II, 10/20 (50.0%) in Group-III, and 4/21 (19.0%) in Group-IV. Overall, hematological response was seen in 177/218 (81.2%) patients, even among those with an excess of bone marrow blasts/frank acute myeloid leukemia. Duration of response was comparable between the four patient groups. A complete cytogenetic response was achieved by 38.0% overall, more commonly in Group-I (42.3%) and -III (35.7%). Transfusion-independent patients and those with a higher MCV or lower marrow blast cells at baseline had a higher probability of achieving a major response. With multivariate analysis, factors associated with overall survival were age, performance status, transfusion dependence, and marrow blast cell percentage at treatment start, as well as time from initial diagnosis to lenalidomide start. Conclusions: Lenalidomide was highly effective in patients with the del(5)q syndrome and also in those with isolated del(5)q, other than del(5)q syndrome, or those exhibiting del(5)q plus only one additional cytogenetic abnormality, not affecting chromosome 7.